search for: 0.0225

To whom it may concern: I am trying a factorial design a system of mine that has two factors. Each factor was set at four different levels, with one replication for each of the combinations. My data is as follows: A B Response 1 600 2.5 0.0257 2 600 2.5 0.0254 3 600 5

Dear R helpers     Suppose I have a following data   y  <- c(9.21, 9.51, 9.73, 9.88, 10.12. 10.21)   t  <- c(0, 0.25, 1, 3, 6, 12)   I want to find out the polynomial which fits y in terms of t i.e. y = f(t) some function of t.   e.g.   y = bo + b1*t + (b2 * t^2) + (b3 * t^3) + ...... and so on.   In Excel I have defined y as independent variable, then defined t, t^2 and t^3 and using

Dear all, I'm using R 2.8.1 under Windows Vista on a dual core 2,4 GhZ with 4 GB of RAM. I'm trying to reproduce a result out of "Analysis of Financial Time Series" by Ruey Tsay. In R I'm using the fGarch library. After fitting a ar(3)-garch(1,1)-model > model<-garchFit(~arma(3,0)+garch(1,1), analyse) I'm saving the results via > result<-model

Hello, I have a few questions about & Ouliaris Unit Root Test of type Pz 1) I noticed that critical values given in the article "Asymptotic properties of residual..." by Phillips and Ouliaris are different from those given by R. More presicely - they are swaped with each other. Could explain why? 2) that question is quite stupid. Can you explain what coefficients for test Pz mean?

Full_Name: Somkiat Apipattanavis Version: 2.1.1 OS: Windows Submission from: (NULL) (128.138.44.123) Bug found in predict.locfit for density estimation # Example of bug found in prdict.locfit (Locfit) library('locfit') # generate data y =c(4281,2497,4346,5588,5593,3474,4291,2542,5195,4056, 3114,2864,4904,7625,3377,4001,4999,7191,8062,5668) x1=c( 0.258729, 1.460156, 0.192323,

Hello, I will try to explain the problem, sorry if it will be a little long... I'm using R to analyze results of cyclic mechanical testing, like this: - apply quasi-sinusoidal load - measure quasi-sinusoidal vertical and horizontal deformations (quasi-sinusoidal load means that load "should be" sinusoidal, but testing machine puts in some noise...) I enclose a sample of data at

Apologies for the coming to this late... 1. By now I hope Somkiat has realized that R-bugs is not the place to report problems in contributed packages. Please direct such reports to the package maintainer. 2. This is really user error. predict() expect the newdata to be a data frame containing variables with the same names as those used in the fitting process. E.g., you fitted the model with

For those who are interested, I've run 3 EAQUAL tests on both the LAME and OGG encoders: LAME with the --alt-standard preset (with and without --nspsytune) and OGGENC (RC3) with -q 6 (my personal "sweet spot") I am somewhat unsure though about the validity of these tests, since the original and decoded files were not the same size (2 KB difference). The LAME encoded files were also

Hello, Excuse me for a more methodological than technical question. I'm developing a Cox model with 10 covariates. One of them is age (named "eta"). I've checked proportionality with cox.zph with age continuous: > cox.zph(coxph(Surv(TTP,CENSOTTP)~eta)) rho chisq p eta -0.0154 0.0225 0.88 and categorical (eta<60): >

I am trying to use the quantcut function to create deciles, but I am getting the error below. I am new to using this function and do not know how to properly use the options or some other conversion that is necessary. #initial summary using describe function in Hmisc library DegreeBurn4th n missing unique Mean .05 .10 .25 .50 .75 .90 .95 76 133

On Feb 25, 2011, at 11:38 AM, Rafael Avila de Espindola wrote: >>> Can someone else try to reproduce this? > > I tried gcc.c from > http://people.csail.mit.edu/smcc/projects/single-file-programs/ and the > difference is a bit more noticeable: > > -O0 -mno-relax-all > > real 0m13.182s > user 0m12.690s > sys 0m0.450s > > -O0 > > gcc.o is

>> Can someone else try to reproduce this? I tried gcc.c from http://people.csail.mit.edu/smcc/projects/single-file-programs/ and the difference is a bit more noticeable: -O0 -mno-relax-all real 0m13.182s user 0m12.690s sys 0m0.450s -O0 gcc.o is 10932968 bytes. real 0m12.969s user 0m12.520s sys 0m0.410s gcc.o is 11410552 bytes IMHO it would still be reasonable to switch to

On 23.11.2012, at 15:12, john skaller <skaller at users.sourceforge.net> wrote: > > On 23/11/2012, at 5:46 PM, Sean Silva wrote: > >> Adding LLVMdev, since this is intimately related to the optimization passes. >> >>> I think this is roughly because some function level optimisations are >>> worse than O(N) in the number of instructions. >>

On Fri, Sep 14, 2007 at 11:42:18PM -0700, Tanya Lattner wrote: > The 2.1 pre-release (version 1) is available for testing: > http://llvm.org/prereleases/2.1/version1/ > > [...] > > 2) Download llvm-2.1, llvm-test-2.1, and the llvm-gcc4.0 source. > Compile everything. Run "make check" and the full llvm-test suite > (make TEST=nightly report). > > Send

Target: FreeBSD 7.0-RC1 on amd64. autoconf says: configure:2122: checking build system type configure:2140: result: x86_64-unknown-freebsd7.0 [...] configure:2721: gcc -v >&5 Using built-in specs. Target: amd64-undermydesk-freebsd Configured with: FreeBSD/amd64 system compiler Thread model: posix gcc version 4.2.1 20070719 [FreeBSD] [...] objdir != srcdir, for both llvm and gcc. Release

LLVMers, The 2.2 prerelease is now available for testing: http://llvm.org/prereleases/2.2/ If anyone can help test this release, I ask that you do the following: 1) Build llvm and llvm-gcc (or use a binary). You may build release (default) or debug. You may pick llvm-gcc-4.0, llvm-gcc-4.2, or both. 2) Run 'make check'. 3) In llvm-test, run 'make TEST=nightly report'. 4) When

LLVMers, The 2.1 pre-release (version 1) is available for testing: http://llvm.org/prereleases/2.1/version1/ I'm looking for members of the LLVM community to test the 2.1 release. There are 2 ways you can help: 1) Download llvm-2.1, llvm-test-2.1, and the appropriate llvm-gcc4.0 binary. Run "make check" and the full llvm-test suite (make TEST=nightly report). 2) Download