search for: 0.0189

before I accuse somebody to "overbill" I would like you to calculate with me: Rate: 0.0189 for calling Taiwan via NuFone Duration: 930 seconds Lets vote for the answers: 0.7269 or 0.2929 ??? bye Ronald Wiplinger

Dear All, I wonder whether it is still valid to use the following R code for cut. All I have done is changed: if (is.na(breaks) | breaks < 2) to: if (is.na(breaks) | breaks < 1) so that it covers interval of 1? It seems okay for my purposes but I am not sure why R specifically does not allow break<2 to happen. Steve. cut.default<- function (x, breaks, labels =

Here is some timing information from running the Zig standard library tests: $ ./zig test ../std/index.zig --enable-timing-info Name Start End Duration Percent Initialize 0.0000 0.0010 0.0010 0.0001 Semantic Analysis 0.0010 0.9968 0.9958 0.1192 Code Generation 0.9968 1.4000 0.4032

Thanks, that was a really helpful suggestion. If you're curious- here are some of the high cost areas: ===-------------------------------------------------------------------------=== DWARF Emission ===-------------------------------------------------------------------------=== Total Execution Time: 2.0117 seconds (2.0185 wall clock) ---User Time---

Hi all: Can someone advice me on how to hold the residuals Mean sq value on a string so it can be used in other calculations. I was trying something like this: Msquare<-dfr$Mean sq but fails..Thanks dfr <- read.table(textConnection("percentQ Efficiency 1.565 0.0125 1.94 0.0213 0.876 0.003736 1.027 0.006 1.536 0.0148 1.536 0.0162 2.607 0.02 1.456 0.0157 2.16 0.0103

Dear all, I'm using R 2.8.1 under Windows Vista on a dual core 2,4 GhZ with 4 GB of RAM. I'm trying to reproduce a result out of "Analysis of Financial Time Series" by Ruey Tsay. In R I'm using the fGarch library. After fitting a ar(3)-garch(1,1)-model > model<-garchFit(~arma(3,0)+garch(1,1), analyse) I'm saving the results via > result<-model

Thanks for the response. I was not very clear in my original request. What I am asking is if in a non-linear estimation problem using nls(), as the condition number of the Hessian matrix becomes larger, will the t-values of one or more of the parameters being estimated in general become smaller in absolute value -- that is, are low t-values a sign of an ill-conditioned Hessian? Typical

Dear friends, I am trying to understand and implement instrumental variables regression using R. I found a small (simple) example here which purportedly illustrates the mechanics (using 2-stage least-squares): http://www.r-bloggers.com/a-simple-instrumental-variables-problem/ Basically, here are the R commands (reproducible example) from that site: # ------ begin R library(AER)

With the case-insensitive file system patch from http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=9656#c15 applied to dragonegg 2.9, the following Polyhedron 2005 benchmarks are seen on x86_64-apple-darwin10 under gcc 4.5.3svn using the dragonegg plugin... ================================================================================ Date & Time : 8 Apr 2011 19:52:56 Test Name :

Hi all: I have always used SPSS to estimate weekly covariance based on a linear regression model but have to hard code the model Std. Error and the Mean-Square and then execute one week a the time. I was wondering if someone could give me an idea on how to estimate weekly(WK) covariance using the summary and anova of "dfr"(lineal model below). I have to do this for 52

Hello, Can the x and y axis limits be specified in a density plot with the mixtools package for a finite mixture model? Uncommenting the xlim2/ ylim2 lines in the plot command below generates 'not a graphical parameter' warnings (and does not change the axis settings), and uncommenting the xlim/ylim lines generates a 'formal argument "ylim" matched by multiple actual

Hi Jack, thanks for the numbers. Any chance of analysing why gcc does better on those where it does much better than dragonegg? Ciao, Duncan. > With the case-insensitive file system patch from http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=9656#c15 > applied to dragonegg 2.9, the following Polyhedron 2005 benchmarks are seen on x86_64-apple-darwin10 > under gcc 4.5.3svn using the dragonegg

How do we specify a contrast interaction matrix for an ANOVA model? We have a two-factor, repeated measures design, with Cue Direction (2) x Brain Hemisphere(2) Each of these has 2 levels, 'left' and 'right', so it's a simple 2x2 design matrix. We have 8 subjects in each cell (a balanced design) and we want to specify the interaction contrast so that: CueLeft>CueRght

On Fri, Sep 14, 2007 at 11:42:18PM -0700, Tanya Lattner wrote: > The 2.1 pre-release (version 1) is available for testing: > http://llvm.org/prereleases/2.1/version1/ > > [...] > > 2) Download llvm-2.1, llvm-test-2.1, and the llvm-gcc4.0 source. > Compile everything. Run "make check" and the full llvm-test suite > (make TEST=nightly report). > > Send

Target: FreeBSD 6.2-STABLE on i386 autoconf says: configure:2122: checking build system type configure:2140: result: i386-unknown-freebsd6.2 [...] configure:2721: gcc -v >&5 Using built-in specs. Configured with: FreeBSD/i386 system compiler Thread model: posix gcc version 3.4.6 [FreeBSD] 20060305 [...] objdir != srcdir, for both llvm and gcc. Release build. llvm-gcc 4.2 from source.

LLVMers, The 2.2 prerelease is now available for testing: http://llvm.org/prereleases/2.2/ If anyone can help test this release, I ask that you do the following: 1) Build llvm and llvm-gcc (or use a binary). You may build release (default) or debug. You may pick llvm-gcc-4.0, llvm-gcc-4.2, or both. 2) Run 'make check'. 3) In llvm-test, run 'make TEST=nightly report'. 4) When

Target: FreeBSD 7.0-RC1 on amd64. autoconf says: configure:2122: checking build system type configure:2140: result: x86_64-unknown-freebsd7.0 [...] configure:2721: gcc -v >&5 Using built-in specs. Target: amd64-undermydesk-freebsd Configured with: FreeBSD/amd64 system compiler Thread model: posix gcc version 4.2.1 20070719 [FreeBSD] [...] objdir != srcdir, for both llvm and gcc. Release

Hi all, I've started looking at the GlobalMerge pass, enabled by default on ARM and AArch64. I think we should reconsider that, at least for AArch64. As is, the pass just merges all globals together, in groups of 4KB (AArch64, 128B on ARM). At the time it was enabled, the general thinking was "it's almost free, it doesn't affect performance much, we might as well use it".

LLVMers, The 2.1 pre-release (version 1) is available for testing: http://llvm.org/prereleases/2.1/version1/ I'm looking for members of the LLVM community to test the 2.1 release. There are 2 ways you can help: 1) Download llvm-2.1, llvm-test-2.1, and the appropriate llvm-gcc4.0 binary. Run "make check" and the full llvm-test suite (make TEST=nightly report). 2) Download

Hello all: We free old transmitted packets in ndo_start_xmit() currently, so any packet must be orphaned also there. This was used to reduce the overhead of tx interrupt to achieve better performance. But this may not work for some protocols such as TCP stream. TCP depends on the value of sk_wmem_alloc to implement various optimization for small packets stream such as TCP small queue and auto