search for: 0.0122

Hello All, I have the following dataset: Year 2006 2007 Jan Jan 0.0204 0.0065 Feb Feb 0.0145 0.0082 Mar Mar 0.0027 0.0122 > dput(d_tmp) structure(list(Year = c("Jan", "Feb", "Mar"), `2006` = c(0.0204, 0.0145, 0.0027), `2007` = c(0.0065, 0.0082, 0.0122)), .Names = c("Year", "2006", "2007"), row.names = c("Jan",

I have a fairly large set of data with the following attributes: >str(raw.data) `data.frame': 1429 obs. of 16 variables: $ TStamp :`POSIXlt', format: chr "2001-11-25 02:00:00" "2001-11-25 01:55:00" "2001-11-25 01:50:00" "2001-11-25 01:45:00" ... $ iPDT.AHU14.14: num 0.0122 0.0125 0.0120 0.0120 0.0122 ... $ iPDT.AHU14.15: num 0.0121

I performed an aov() analysis and got the following results: Df Sum Sq Mean Sq F value Pr(>F) block 1 0.0040 0.0040 0.3282 0.5672 Residuals 269 3.2766 0.0122 Can anyone tell me how to extract the F value column and Pr(>F) column from the summary output of aov analysis? Many thanks in advance, Liqing Eco. Evol. Biol. UCIrvine

Hi all: Can someone advice me on how to hold the residuals Mean sq value on a string so it can be used in other calculations. I was trying something like this: Msquare<-dfr$Mean sq but fails..Thanks dfr <- read.table(textConnection("percentQ Efficiency 1.565 0.0125 1.94 0.0213 0.876 0.003736 1.027 0.006 1.536 0.0148 1.536 0.0162 2.607 0.02 1.456 0.0157 2.16 0.0103

    I created a couple of timeSeries objects - when I was merging them , I got an error. Looking at the data , I see that one of the time series has   06/30/2007  0.0028       0.0183  0.0122      0.0042  0.0095    -          07/31/2007 -0.0111       0.0255  0.0096     -0.0069 -0.0024  0.0043       08/31/2007 -0.0108      -0.0237 -0.0062     -0.0138 -0.0173 -0.0065       09/30/2007 

Hi, I have a situation here. I try this update: mmaa <- update(mma,biomass~qvartemp) but I have this message: Error in eval(expr, envir, enclos) : object "qvartemp" not found but this object exist: [1] "cont" "i" "levelsord" "mma" "qvar" "qvarmma" [7] "qvartemp" "test"

Hi all: I have always used SPSS to estimate weekly covariance based on a linear regression model but have to hard code the model Std. Error and the Mean-Square and then execute one week a the time. I was wondering if someone could give me an idea on how to estimate weekly(WK) covariance using the summary and anova of "dfr"(lineal model below). I have to do this for 52

samples % lib function 4 0.0525 libdovecot.so.0.0.0 sha1_result_libmysqlcli(..) 7 0.0919 libdovecot.so.0.0.0 io_loop_handler_run 36 0.4729 libdovecot.so.0.0.0 imap_parser_reset 227 2.9817 libdovecot.so.0.0.0 pool_alloconly_unref 7339 96.4009 libdovecot.so.0.0.0 pool_alloconly_clear 7710 3.2463

Hi Experts, I am new to R, and was wondering how to do 3D linear regression in R. In other words, I need to Fit a 3-Dimensional Line to Data Points (input). I googled before posting this, and found that it is possible in Matlab and other commercial packages. For example, see the Matlab link:

Hello, I did a cross-validation using cvlm from DAAG package but wasn't sure how to assess the result. Does this result means my model is a good model? I understand that the overall ms is the mean of sum of squares. But is 0.0987 a good number? The response (i.e. gailRel5yr) has min,1st Quantile, median, mean and 3rd Quantile, and max as follows: (0.462, 0.628, 0.806, 0.896, 1.000, 2.400) ?

I'm creating a lattice barchart based off a pretty complicated data structure. The barchart comes out quite nice ( thanks to lattice ) but the problem is that the horizontal axis comes out all scrunched because the barchart doesn't know that the intervals of Var.1 are really "associated" with the conditioning variable Var.2. Therefore, all the intervals of Var.1 are put on

On Fri, Sep 14, 2007 at 11:42:18PM -0700, Tanya Lattner wrote: > The 2.1 pre-release (version 1) is available for testing: > http://llvm.org/prereleases/2.1/version1/ > > [...] > > 2) Download llvm-2.1, llvm-test-2.1, and the llvm-gcc4.0 source. > Compile everything. Run "make check" and the full llvm-test suite > (make TEST=nightly report). > > Send

On 23.11.2012, at 15:12, john skaller <skaller at users.sourceforge.net> wrote: > > On 23/11/2012, at 5:46 PM, Sean Silva wrote: > >> Adding LLVMdev, since this is intimately related to the optimization passes. >> >>> I think this is roughly because some function level optimisations are >>> worse than O(N) in the number of instructions. >>

Target: FreeBSD 7.0-RC1 on amd64. autoconf says: configure:2122: checking build system type configure:2140: result: x86_64-unknown-freebsd7.0 [...] configure:2721: gcc -v >&5 Using built-in specs. Target: amd64-undermydesk-freebsd Configured with: FreeBSD/amd64 system compiler Thread model: posix gcc version 4.2.1 20070719 [FreeBSD] [...] objdir != srcdir, for both llvm and gcc. Release

Hi all, I've started looking at the GlobalMerge pass, enabled by default on ARM and AArch64. I think we should reconsider that, at least for AArch64. As is, the pass just merges all globals together, in groups of 4KB (AArch64, 128B on ARM). At the time it was enabled, the general thinking was "it's almost free, it doesn't affect performance much, we might as well use it".

LLVMers, The 2.1 pre-release (version 1) is available for testing: http://llvm.org/prereleases/2.1/version1/ I'm looking for members of the LLVM community to test the 2.1 release. There are 2 ways you can help: 1) Download llvm-2.1, llvm-test-2.1, and the appropriate llvm-gcc4.0 binary. Run "make check" and the full llvm-test suite (make TEST=nightly report). 2) Download

LLVMers, The 2.2 prerelease is now available for testing: http://llvm.org/prereleases/2.2/ If anyone can help test this release, I ask that you do the following: 1) Build llvm and llvm-gcc (or use a binary). You may build release (default) or debug. You may pick llvm-gcc-4.0, llvm-gcc-4.2, or both. 2) Run 'make check'. 3) In llvm-test, run 'make TEST=nightly report'. 4) When