search for: 0.00s

Hi all, I'm setting up an LXC container for Ubuntu 13.10 where the X server is started in the host on vt6. The unix socket and authority file are then mounted in the LXC container. I can start X sessions and applications from the container but I can't get LightDM to use this server. I would really like to have the container's LightDM/Ubuntu greeter to automatically start on this

Hi, I am using Rattle 2.6.4 with R 2.12.2 on win64, is this a bug ? Following is the content after execute the associate analysis process: Summary of the Apriori Association Rules: Number of Rules: 23351 Summary of the Measures of Interestingness: support confidence lift Min. :0.1250 Min. :1 Min. :2.667 1st Qu.:0.1250 1st Qu.:1 1st Qu.:2.667 Median :0.1250

Hello CentOS-Community, I have to maintain a server that should be useable with VNC and some software requires to run VirtualGL. Also a nvidia graphic card is installed. After downloading and installing the nvidia driver from nvidias homepage and modifying the xorg.conf as mentioned on the virtualgL-homepage, I am not able to restart lightdm anymore. Lightdm should be running, otherwise

Op 29-01-15 om 00:00 schreef Gordon Messmer: > On 01/28/2015 12:12 PM, Patrick Bervoets wrote: >> >> ARPING 192.168.1.15 from 0.0.0.0 br0 >> Unicast reply from 192.168.1.15 [AC:16:2D:72:67:D4] 0.723ms >> Sent 1 probes (1 broadcast(s)) >> Received 1 response(s) >> >> Thanks anyway > > I'm not sure what you mean by "thanks anyway".

Op 29-01-15 om 21:21 schreef Gordon Messmer: > > I haven't seen delays anywhere near that long before, even with heavy swapping. But I guess I'd look at that sort of thing first. > > Run "iostat -x 2" and see if your disks are being fully utilized during the pauses. Run "top" and see if there's anything useful there. Check swap use with

Hi, I made the switch from KDE4->XFCE, and because gdm takes more time than xfce to start I would like to replace it with lightdm. I installed lightdm, set it as default display manager and configured the gtk greeter. However, when I start I only get a black screen (x running) and nothing else happens. When I start it as root with the --test-mode argument, I get the following message: lightdm

I have an email server running Exim, Dovecot, Spamassassin, Clam, etc. on Centos 4.x 32bit. On occasion I have disk I/O problems. Its handling several domains and alot of email. Its currently on a single SATA drive. I am thinking of moving too 3 drives with RAID 1 for redundancy. RAID 1 will help me on reads but do nothing on writes as I understand. I am thinking the majority of my I/O is

Hi, I am running Samba version 2.2.5 with utmp turned on. I have a problem with utmp and not displaying who is currently logged in. The basic idea is that even though a user has logged off the computer (win2k pro) a connection to IPC$ remains. It gives this. [root@lifesaver root]# smbstatus -u scott Samba version 2.2.5 Service uid gid pid machine

I think I found a bug affecting btrfs filesystems and users invoking fstrim to discard unused blocks: if I execute a `fstrim -v /` twice, the amount trimmed does not change on the 2nd invocation AND it takes just as long as the first.  Why do I think this is a bug?  When I do the same on an ext4 partition I get different behavior: the output shows 0 B trimmed and it does is instantaneously when I

Here is a small btrfs vs. ext4 benchmark with kernel 2.6.37-rc1. compilebench with options -i 10 -r 30 on 2.6.37-rc1 btrfs ========================================================================== intial create total runs 10 avg 73.11 MB/s (user 0.34s sys 1.96s) create total runs 5 avg 49.53 MB/s (user 0.41s sys 1.62s) patch total runs 4 avg 22.13 MB/s (user 0.09s sys 1.79s) compile total runs

Recently we installed CENTOS 4.4 on DELL 2650 server. We found CPU load always on 3 and up if we run "top" or "w" to check. There is NO application run on this server why CPU load so heavy? ======= messages from check up === %w 11:31:56 up 20:02, 3 users, load average: 3.06, 3.03, 3.00 USER TTY FROM LOGIN@ IDLE JCPU PCPU WHAT oracle pts/1

Hi list, I don''t trust theoretical benchmarks that much and prefer "real-life benchs" on the occasion, so here''s mine: Given 4 laptops, the most powerful of which was running BTRFS and the others ext3 or ext4, all machines running Ubuntu 11.04 Natty 32-bit with a stock Ubuntu 2.6.38-11 kernel, all machines were given the following FS-intensive task : - Upgrade

Hi, on my c6.3 server (guest of a vmware host) I have a strange load average value: w command: > [root at s-doc ~]# w > 11:19:23 up 41 days, 23:15, 1 user, load average: 4,03, 4,03, 4,00 > USER TTY FROM LOGIN@ IDLE JCPU PCPU WHAT > root pts/2 dodo:S.0 11:15 0.00s 0.02s 0.00s w top command: > top - 12:13:31 up 42 days, 9 min, 1

Hi I use w command to get user is "2 users" but I only have connection one ls any process dead? But I check other centos machine is same How can I check it? Thank you [root at host ~]# w 7:22:26 up 20 days, 23:20, 2 users, load average: 0.00, 0.00, 0.00 USER TTY FROM LOGIN@ IDLE JCPU PCPU WHAT chloe pts/0

Dear all, to begin with, I'm not a professional programmer and this might explain my problems. I apologize tis in advance. I tried to compile R-1.3.1 under hpux 10.20 and have problems with the configure script. I have installed the hpux c and f77 compiler and gcc 3.01 The configue script (started with ./configure) stops with the following lines: checking for unzip... no checking for

Hi, I recently got a bizarre message when running arules. It just said "Killed" and quit. Anyone know why this might have happened? I am running R on an AWS quad xl ubuntu instance. Here is some information, including dataset size and the parameters: parameter specification: confidence minval smax arem aval originalSupport support minlen maxlen 0.0003581251 0.1 1 none

Hello. After upgrading some DCs (in different domains) to 4.10, I'm trying to take backups with samba-tool. I'm not using "online" backups, as they require typing a password, so are not usable in a script. IIUIC, "offline" backups can be used even if Samba is running. However, they seem to get stuck: > root at dc1:~ # samba-tool domain backup offline

I submitted the problem report to clang's bugzilla but no one seems to care so I have to send it to the mailing list. clang 3.7 svn (trunk 229055 as the time I was to report this problem) generates slower code than 3.5 (Apple LLVM version 6.0 (clang-600.0.56) (based on LLVM 3.5svn)) for the following code. It is a "8 queens puzzle" solver written as an educational example. As

The regressions in the performance of generated code, introduced by the llvm 3.6 release, don't seem to be limited to this 8 queens puzzle" solver test case. See... http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article&item=llvm-clang-3.5-3.6-rc1&num=1 where a bit hit in the performance of the Sparse Matrix Multiply test of the SciMark v2.0 benchmark was observed as well as others.

Using the SciMark 2.0 code from http://math.nist.gov/scimark2/scimark2_1c.zip compiled with the same... make CFLAGS="-O3 -march=native" I am able to reproduce the 22% performance regression in the run time of the Sparse matmult benchmark. For 10 runs of the scimark2 benechmark, I get 998.439+/-0.4828 with the release llvm clang 3.5.1 compiler and 1217.363+/-1.1004 for the current