search for: 0.0079

Hello I want to fit an AR model were two of the coefficients are fixed to zero (the second and third ar-coefficients). I used the "arima" function with the "fixed" argument but the ar3 coefficient is not set to zero: ============================================== > arima(Y, order=c(4,0,0), xreg=1:23, fixed=c(NA,0,0,NA,NA,NA)) Call: arima(x = Y, order = c(4, 0, 0), xreg =

Dear R-tisans, I am trying to calculate the 12th root of a transition (square) matrix, but can't seem to obtain an accurate result. I realize that this post is laced with intimations of quantitative finance, but the question is both R-related and broadly mathematical. That said, I'm happy to post this to R-SIG-Finance if I've erred in posting this to the general list. I've

i want to ask 2 questions. 1) can R do Random-effects GLS regression which i can get from Stata? the following result is frome Stata.can I get the alike result from R? xtreg lwage educ black hisp exper expersq married union, re Random-effects GLS regression Number of obs = 4360 Group variable (i) : nr Number of groups = 545 R-sq:

Dear friends, In R, the help of "bic.glm" tells the difference between postmean(the posterior mean of each coefficient from model averaging) and condpostmean(the posterior mean of each coefficient conditional on the variable being included in the model), But it's still unclear about the results explanations, and the artile of Rnews in 2005 on BMA still don't give more detail on

Dear list-members I am new to R and a statistics beginner. I really like the ease with which I can extract and manipulate data in R, and would like to use it primarily. I've been learning by checking analyses that have already been run in SAS. In an experiment with Y being a response variable, and group a 2-level between-subject factor, and time a 5-level within-subject factor. 2

Dear Sir or Madam? I am a doctor of urology,and I am engaged in developing a nomogram of bladder cancer. May I ask for your help on below issue? I set up a dataset which include 317 cases. I got the Binary Logistic Regression model by SPSS.And then I try to reconstruct the model ?lrm(RECU~Complication+T.Num+T.Grade+Year+TS)? by R-Project,and try to internal validate the model through

The concrete problem is that I am refereeing a paper where a confidence interval is presented for the risk ratio and I do not find it credible. I show below my attempts to do this in R. The example is slightly changed from the authors'. I can obtain a confidence interval for the odds ratio from fisher.test of course === fisher.test example === > outcome <- matrix(c(500, 0, 500, 8),

Dear R-list, I have a data set from 20 pigs, each of which is tested at crossed 9 doses (logdose -4:4) and 3 skin treatment substances when exposed to a standard polluted environment. So there are 27 patches on each pig. The response is irritation=yes/no. I want to determine "equally effective 50% doses" (similar to old LD50), and to test the treatments against each other. I am looking

Dear R users: I am using survreg for modeling left censored longitudinal data. When I am using the following code for fitting the tobit model I am getting some output with an warning message(highlighted with red color): > survreg(Surv(y, y>=0, type='left')~x + frailty(id), cytokine.data, weight=w, dist='gaussian', scale=1) Call: survreg(formula = Surv(y, y >= 0, type

On Fri, Sep 14, 2007 at 11:42:18PM -0700, Tanya Lattner wrote: > The 2.1 pre-release (version 1) is available for testing: > http://llvm.org/prereleases/2.1/version1/ > > [...] > > 2) Download llvm-2.1, llvm-test-2.1, and the llvm-gcc4.0 source. > Compile everything. Run "make check" and the full llvm-test suite > (make TEST=nightly report). > > Send

On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 5:40 PM, Óscar Fuentes<ofv at wanadoo.es> wrote: > It seems that support for dumping text representation of LLVM objects to > standard channels and C++ output streams was removed. My guess is that > now we must use errs() instead of std::cerr, llvm::raw_fd_ostream > instead of std::ofstream, etc. Correct. std::ostream has been purged from LLVM; the only

Dear all, I'm using R 2.8.1 under Windows Vista on a dual core 2,4 GhZ with 4 GB of RAM. I'm trying to reproduce a result out of "Analysis of Financial Time Series" by Ruey Tsay. In R I'm using the fGarch library. After fitting a ar(3)-garch(1,1)-model > model<-garchFit(~arma(3,0)+garch(1,1), analyse) I'm saving the results via > result<-model

I am trying to show some techniques to my graduate regression class. The textbook mentioned using bootstrap samples of regression coefficients for assessing variability. I decided to show them reasonably effective ways of doing the resampling. The following is a function I wrote to create bootstrap samples of coefficients from a fitted linear regression model. bsCoefSample <- ##

Target: FreeBSD 6.2-STABLE on i386 autoconf says: configure:2122: checking build system type configure:2140: result: i386-unknown-freebsd6.2 [...] configure:2721: gcc -v >&5 Using built-in specs. Configured with: FreeBSD/i386 system compiler Thread model: posix gcc version 3.4.6 [FreeBSD] 20060305 [...] objdir != srcdir, for both llvm and gcc. Release build. llvm-gcc 4.2 from source.

It seems that support for dumping text representation of LLVM objects to standard channels and C++ output streams was removed. My guess is that now we must use errs() instead of std::cerr, llvm::raw_fd_ostream instead of std::ofstream, etc. The changes are not trivial, as for instance llvm::raw_fd_ostream without flags fails if the file exists, but std::ofstream does not. The changes include

Hi, Below you can see the updated benchmark results for the new SLP-vectorizer. As you can see, there is a small number of compile time regressions, a single major runtime *regression, and many performance gains. There is a tiny increase in code size: 30k for the whole test-suite. Based on the numbers below I would like to enable the SLP-vectorizer by default for -O3. Please let me know if you

LLVMers, The 2.1 pre-release (version 1) is available for testing: http://llvm.org/prereleases/2.1/version1/ I'm looking for members of the LLVM community to test the 2.1 release. There are 2 ways you can help: 1) Download llvm-2.1, llvm-test-2.1, and the appropriate llvm-gcc4.0 binary. Run "make check" and the full llvm-test suite (make TEST=nightly report). 2) Download

Hi, LLVM 2.1-pre1 test results: Linux (SUSE) on x86 (P4) Release mode, but with assertions enabled LLVM srcdir == objdir # of expected passes 2250 # of expected failures 5 I ran the llvm-test suite on my desktop while I was also working on that PC, so don't put too much trust in the timing info. Especially during the "spiff" test the machine was swapping

LLVMers, The 2.2 prerelease is now available for testing: http://llvm.org/prereleases/2.2/ If anyone can help test this release, I ask that you do the following: 1) Build llvm and llvm-gcc (or use a binary). You may build release (default) or debug. You may pick llvm-gcc-4.0, llvm-gcc-4.2, or both. 2) Run 'make check'. 3) In llvm-test, run 'make TEST=nightly report'. 4) When

On Sun, 10 Oct 2004, RenE J.V. Bertin wrote: > Could I ask some hints/help in interpreting the following ANOVA results, > please? This concerns an experiment where I study the incidence and > severity of motion sickness. I have Sickness.norm, a subjective > discomfort/sickness estimate, normalised to 0..1, the session time T > (normalised to 0..1 and binned in 0.2 wide bins) and a