Displaying 20 results from an estimated 24 matches for "0.0054".
Did you mean:
0.005
2010 Aug 30
4
LOOping problem with R
Dear Guys,
I do converting codes from Fortran into R and got stuck in solving LOOPING
procedure with R. In FORTRAN, it is (DO and END DO) for looping in the net.
In R, it is (FOR with { }).
I believe there is something wrong with my coding in R, do hope that you can
help me solving following problems.
It seems easy, but results are not the same.
2005 Jan 03
1
different DF in package nlme and lme4
Hi all
I tried to reproduce an example with lme and used the Orthodont
dataset.
library(nlme)
fm2a.1 <- lme(distance ~ age + Sex, data = Orthodont, random = ~ 1 | Subject)
anova(fm2a.1)
> numDF denDF F-value p-value
> (Intercept) 1 80 4123.156 <.0001
> age 1 80 114.838 <.0001
> Sex 1 25 9.292 0.0054
or alternatively
2004 Dec 02
1
treatment contrasts and summary.lm
Dear list members,
I have a 2-factor ANOVA where the summary.lm output looks like this
(using treatment contrasts):
Value Std. Error t value Pr(>|t|)
(Intercept) 0.0389 0.0220 1.7695 0.0817
as.factor(Block)1 0.0156 0.0066 2.3597 0.0215
as.factor(Block)2 -0.0018 0.0037 -0.4857 0.6289
as.factor(Block)3 -0.0007 0.0026 -0.2812 0.7795
2005 Nov 25
0
multiple imputation of anova tables
Dear list members,
how can multiple imputation realized for anova tables in R? Concretely,
how to combine
F-values and R^2, R^2_adjusted from multiple imputations in R?
Of course, the point estimates can be averaged, but how to get
standarderrors for F-values/R^2 etc. in R?
For linear models, lm.mids() works well, but according to Rubins rules,
standard errors have to be used together with
2004 Aug 27
2
degrees of freedom (lme4 and nlme)
Hi, I'm having some problems regarding the packages
lme4 and nlme, more specifically in the denominator
degrees of freedom. I used data Orthodont for the two
packages. The commands used are below.
require(nlme)
data(Orthodont)
fm1<-lme(distance~age+ Sex,
data=Orthodont,random=~1|Subject, method="REML")
anova(fm1)
numDF DenDF F-value p-value
(Intercept) 1
2008 Feb 03
0
[LLVMdev] 2.2 Prerelease available for testing
Target: FreeBSD 6.2-STABLE on i386
autoconf says:
configure:2122: checking build system type
configure:2140: result: i386-unknown-freebsd6.2
[...]
configure:2721: gcc -v >&5
Using built-in specs.
Configured with: FreeBSD/i386 system compiler
Thread model: posix
gcc version 3.4.6 [FreeBSD] 20060305
[...]
objdir != srcdir, for both llvm and gcc.
Release build.
llvm-gcc 4.2 from source.
2017 Dec 20
2
outlining (highlighting) pixels in ggplot2
Using the small reproducible example below, I'd like to know if one can
somehow use the matrix "sig" (defined below) to add a black outline (with
lwd=2) to all pixels with a corresponding value of 1 in the matrix 'sig'?
So for example, in the ggplot2 plot below, the pixel located at [1,3] would
be outlined by a black square since the value at sig[1,3] == 1. This is my
first
2012 Nov 23
2
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] costing optimisations
On 23.11.2012, at 15:12, john skaller <skaller at users.sourceforge.net> wrote:
>
> On 23/11/2012, at 5:46 PM, Sean Silva wrote:
>
>> Adding LLVMdev, since this is intimately related to the optimization passes.
>>
>>> I think this is roughly because some function level optimisations are
>>> worse than O(N) in the number of instructions.
>>
2005 Jul 01
0
[LLVMdev] execution time of bytecode and native
On Thu, 30 Jun 2005, Tanu Sharma wrote:
> I am compiling SPEC 2000 benchmarks with llvm .Got stuck with
> calculating "execution time" of all the .bc and native files.
>
> The log for nightly test itself gives execution times but I am passing
> the bytecode files to my pass which gives another bytecode file.I have
> to calculate execution time of such bytecode and
2010 Jun 18
1
12th Root of a Square (Transition) Matrix
Dear R-tisans,
I am trying to calculate the 12th root of a transition (square) matrix, but can't seem to obtain an accurate result. I realize that this post is laced with intimations of quantitative finance, but the question is both R-related and broadly mathematical. That said, I'm happy to post this to R-SIG-Finance if I've erred in posting this to the general list.
I've
2005 Jul 01
1
[LLVMdev] execution time of bytecode and native
Hello ,
I am compiling SPEC 2000 benchmarks with llvm .Got stuck with calculating "execution time" of all the .bc and native files.
The log for nightly test itself gives execution times but I am passing the bytecode files to my pass which gives another bytecode file.I have to calculate execution time of such bytecode and native files as well.If i simply do this:
time lli
2008 Jan 24
6
[LLVMdev] 2.2 Prerelease available for testing
LLVMers,
The 2.2 prerelease is now available for testing:
http://llvm.org/prereleases/2.2/
If anyone can help test this release, I ask that you do the following:
1) Build llvm and llvm-gcc (or use a binary). You may build release
(default) or debug. You may pick llvm-gcc-4.0, llvm-gcc-4.2, or both.
2) Run 'make check'.
3) In llvm-test, run 'make TEST=nightly report'.
4) When
2005 Jul 21
1
[LLVMdev] execution time of bytecode and native
Hello All,
Thanks for the reply.I can generate the reports by compiling Spec through llvm, but that couldn't resolve my problem.
I m trying to determine execution time for the bytecode and native files , which are obtained as a result of running my pass over the original bytecode .I am running these experiments on spec benchmark.
In SPEC we have command line tools such as runspec where
2004 Apr 17
0
nlme - sum of squares - permutation test
Hi,
1/ I wonder why a anova.lme on a single lme object does not print the sum of squares (as expected from the help: "a data frame with the sums of squares, numerator degrees of freedom, denominator
degrees of freedom, F-values, and P-values").
Example:
> fm2 <- lme(distance ~ age + Sex, data = Orthodont, random = ~ 1)
> anova(fm2)
numDF denDF F-value p-value
2005 Jun 08
0
bug in predict.lme?
Dear All,
I've come across a problem in predict.lme. Assigning a model formula to a variable and then using this variable in lme (instead of typing the formula into the formula part of lme) works as expect. However, when performing a predict on the fitted model I gan an error messag - predict.lme (but not predictlm) seems to expect a 'properly' typed in formula and a cannot extract
2008 Aug 05
1
Confidence interval for the coefficient of variation
Dear,
We are trying to determine the (one-sided) CI for the coefficient of
variation in a small sample (say n = 10), with mean 100 and standard
deviation 21.
It appears though that the R-function ci.cv() and our simulation do not
agree.
The R-code:
library(MBESS)
n = 10
ci.cv(mean = 100, sd = 21, n = 10, conf.level = 0.9)
U10.95 <- 0.3551754
ci.cv(mean = 100, sd = 21, n = 10, conf.level =
2013 Feb 24
0
BA.plot with logarithmic axes (MethComp)
Dear R-helpers,
I am trying to plot a Bland-Altman-Plot using the BA.plot function from the
package MethComp. While there is a function to transform the values for
analysis as shown in the snippet below, I would like to have logarithmic axes
for display as well. The usual log = 'xy' does not work because of the
properties of the y-asxis (positive and negative values). I am sure that
2017 Dec 20
0
outlining (highlighting) pixels in ggplot2
Hi Eric,
you can use an annotate-layer, eg
ind<-which(sig>0,arr.ind = T)
ggplot(m1.melted, aes(x = Month, y = Site, fill = Concentration), autoscale
= FALSE, zmin = -1 * zmax1, zmax = zmax1) +
geom_tile() +
coord_equal() +
scale_fill_gradient2(low = "darkred",
mid = "white",
high = "darkblue",
2008 Jan 28
0
[LLVMdev] 2.2 Prerelease available for testing
Target: FreeBSD 7.0-RC1 on amd64.
autoconf says:
configure:2122: checking build system type
configure:2140: result: x86_64-unknown-freebsd7.0
[...]
configure:2721: gcc -v >&5
Using built-in specs.
Target: amd64-undermydesk-freebsd
Configured with: FreeBSD/amd64 system compiler
Thread model: posix
gcc version 4.2.1 20070719 [FreeBSD]
[...]
objdir != srcdir, for both llvm and gcc.
Release
2009 Feb 08
0
Initial values of the parameters of a garch-Model
Dear all,
I'm using R 2.8.1 under Windows Vista on a dual core 2,4 GhZ with 4 GB
of RAM.
I'm trying to reproduce a result out of "Analysis of Financial Time
Series" by Ruey Tsay.
In R I'm using the fGarch library.
After fitting a ar(3)-garch(1,1)-model
> model<-garchFit(~arma(3,0)+garch(1,1), analyse)
I'm saving the results via
> result<-model