search for: 0.0015

On Fri, Sep 14, 2007 at 11:42:18PM -0700, Tanya Lattner wrote: > The 2.1 pre-release (version 1) is available for testing: > http://llvm.org/prereleases/2.1/version1/ > > [...] > > 2) Download llvm-2.1, llvm-test-2.1, and the llvm-gcc4.0 source. > Compile everything. Run "make check" and the full llvm-test suite > (make TEST=nightly report). > > Send

Dear All,   is there a function in R that would help me convert a covariance matrix built based on arithmetic returns to a covariance matrix from log-returns?   As an example of the means and covariance from arithmetic:   mu <-c(0.094,0.006,1.337,1.046,0.263) sigma

Target: FreeBSD 7.0-RC1 on amd64. autoconf says: configure:2122: checking build system type configure:2140: result: x86_64-unknown-freebsd7.0 [...] configure:2721: gcc -v >&5 Using built-in specs. Target: amd64-undermydesk-freebsd Configured with: FreeBSD/amd64 system compiler Thread model: posix gcc version 4.2.1 20070719 [FreeBSD] [...] objdir != srcdir, for both llvm and gcc. Release

I am having a problem with optim() using the "L-BFGS-B" method. When I set the lower limit for the third parameter equal to zero I get an error message: > low.lim.3 <- 0 > phi_opt <- optim(phi_, model_lik, NULL, method = "L-BFGS-B", lower=c(0.2, -100, low.lim.3, 0), upper= c(10, 100, 10, 10), control = list(maxit = 1000, parscale = c(0.2, u1, 0.002, 0.002), trace =

LLVMers, The 2.2 prerelease is now available for testing: http://llvm.org/prereleases/2.2/ If anyone can help test this release, I ask that you do the following: 1) Build llvm and llvm-gcc (or use a binary). You may build release (default) or debug. You may pick llvm-gcc-4.0, llvm-gcc-4.2, or both. 2) Run 'make check'. 3) In llvm-test, run 'make TEST=nightly report'. 4) When

I've searched the Web with Google and do not find what might cause this particular error from an invocation of cenboxplot: cenboxplot(cu.t$quant, cu.t$ceneq1, cu.t$era, range=1.5, main='Total Recoverable Copper', ylab='Concentration (mg/L)', xlab='Time Period') Error in if (n > 0) (1L:n - a)/(n + 1 - 2 * a) else numeric() : argument is of length zero I do

Hello, I am a little bit confused regarding the density values obtained from the function kde2d() from the package MASS because the are not in the intervall [0,1] as I would expect them to be. Here is an example: x <- c(0.0036,0.0088,0.0042,0.0022,-0.0013,0.0007,0.0028,-0.0028,0.0019,0.0026,-0.0029,-0.0081,-0.0024,0.0090,0.0088,0.0038,0.0022,0.0068,0.0089,-0.0015,-0.0062,0.0066) y <-

Dear all, I'm using R 2.8.1 under Windows Vista on a dual core 2,4 GhZ with 4 GB of RAM. I'm trying to reproduce a result out of "Analysis of Financial Time Series" by Ruey Tsay. In R I'm using the fGarch library. After fitting a ar(3)-garch(1,1)-model > model<-garchFit(~arma(3,0)+garch(1,1), analyse) I'm saving the results via > result<-model

LLVMers, The 2.1 pre-release (version 1) is available for testing: http://llvm.org/prereleases/2.1/version1/ I'm looking for members of the LLVM community to test the 2.1 release. There are 2 ways you can help: 1) Download llvm-2.1, llvm-test-2.1, and the appropriate llvm-gcc4.0 binary. Run "make check" and the full llvm-test suite (make TEST=nightly report). 2) Download

Dear list members, I have a 2-factor ANOVA where the summary.lm output looks like this (using treatment contrasts): Value Std. Error t value Pr(>|t|) (Intercept) 0.0389 0.0220 1.7695 0.0817 as.factor(Block)1 0.0156 0.0066 2.3597 0.0215 as.factor(Block)2 -0.0018 0.0037 -0.4857 0.6289 as.factor(Block)3 -0.0007 0.0026 -0.2812 0.7795

Hi, I have values on y axe from 0.0001 to 3.086. When I do plot I have writen values: 0.001, 0.050,1.000 ..., but how I can write on graph the minimum value and maximum value, with all decimals (I don't want to use the format 1e-0x)? I am using log scale. For example, if I have the values: 0.0001 0.0015 0.0256 0.0236 .... 0.0201 2.9668 3.0086 I need have each 'x' value put on y axe,

Dear All: I have some questions about the output of coxph. Below is the input and output: ---------------------------------------- > coxph(formula = Surv(futime, fustat) ~ age + rx + ecog.ps, data = + ovarian, x = TRUE) Call: coxph(formula = Surv(futime, fustat) ~ age + rx + ecog.ps, data = ovarian, x = TRUE) coef exp(coef) se(coef) z p age 0.147 1.158

Hi r-sers, I have a data of relative frequencies for the interval of 0-20, 20-40,...380-400.  I would like the two data on the same graph using the same x-axis label.  My question is how to get a smooth curve using kernel density code if it possible for this data.   > cbind(rel_obs,rel_gen)           rel_obs rel_gen  [1,] 0.000000000  0.0000  [2,] 0.092534175  0.0712  [3,] 0.105152471  0.1092

Hi, I am puzzled by the relationship between the p-values asociated with the coefficients of a univariate logistic regression involving categorical variables and the p-value I get from Fisher's exact test of the associated 2 x 2 contingency table. (1) The 2-sided p-value for the table is ~ 0.0015, whereas the p-value for the independent is 0.101 and the p-value for the intercept is

I was testing Ilia's patches for ddx, and while they definitely helped for Xorg itself, qemu still eats a lot of CPU if launched like this qemu-system-x86_64 -cdrom ~/Downloads/ISO/slax-English-US-7.0.8-x86_64.iso -m 1G -display sdl,gl=on -enable-kvm and left for few hours. top - 07:38:01 up 18:05, 2 users, load average: 2,00, 1,89, 1,83 Tasks: 224 total, 3 running, 221 sleeping, 0

Target: FreeBSD 6.2-STABLE on i386 autoconf says: configure:2122: checking build system type configure:2140: result: i386-unknown-freebsd6.2 [...] configure:2721: gcc -v >&5 Using built-in specs. Configured with: FreeBSD/i386 system compiler Thread model: posix gcc version 3.4.6 [FreeBSD] 20060305 [...] objdir != srcdir, for both llvm and gcc. Release build. llvm-gcc 4.2 from source.

Sorry for reposting, but even after extensive search I still did not find any answers. using: summary(aov(pointErrorAbs~noOfSegments*turnAngle+Error(subj/(noOfSegments+turnAngle)), data=anovaAllData )) with subj being a random factor and noOfSegments and turnAngle being fixed factors, I get the following results: ---------------------------------------------- Error: subj Df Sum

A couple weeks ago I posted a message on this topic to r-help, the response was that this seemed like odd behavior, and that I ought to post it to one of the developer lists. I posted to r-sig-mixed-models, but didn't get any response. So, with good intentions, I decided to try posting once more, but to this more general list. The goal is (1) FYI, to make you aware of this issue, in case it

We just studied randomized block design analysis in my statistics class, and I'm trying to learn how to do them in R. I'm trying to duplicate a case study example from my textbook [1]: > # Case Study 13.2.1, page 778 > cd <- c(8, 11, 9, 16, 24) > dp <- c(2, 1, 12, 11, 19) > lm <- c(-2, 0, 6, 2, 11) > table <- data.frame(Block=LETTERS[1:5], "Score

Dear R-helpers, I try to perform glm's with negative binomial distributed data. So I use the MASS library and the commands: model_1 = glm.nb(response ~ y1 + y2 + ...+ yi, data = data.frame) and predict(model_1, newdata = data.frame) So far, I think everything should be ok. But when I want to perform a glm with a subset of the data, I run into an error message as soon as I want to predict