search for: 0.00032

Thank you very much for your reply. Your code work well with this example. I modified a little to fit my real data, I got an error massage. Error in split.default(x = seq_len(nrow(x)), f = f, drop = drop, ...) : Group length is 0 but data length > 0 On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 12:21 PM, arun kirshna [via R] < ml-node+s789695n4657196h87@n4.nabble.com> wrote: > Hi, > Try this: >

Hi all Is there any reason why the parameter i in a "for" loop ignores a value of zero? For example sim=c() p=.2 for(i in 0:5) {sim[i]=dbinom(i,5,p) } sim [1] 0.40960 0.20480 0.05120 0.00640 0.00032 In this example the quantile i= 0 was ignored since dbinom(0,5,p) [1] 0.32768 The same behaviour occurs if I use a while loop to perform the same calculation: sim=c() p=.2 i=0

After much effort I upgraded our fairly large Rails app from 2.1 to 2.3. After deployment yesterday I noticed an across the board increase in response times. It seems that every call to memcache now takes 10x longer than before. Here are some example numbers from my development log (below), with memcache running locally. We see similar scale of performance drop in production as well - average

I am wondering if someone would have any suggestion about my issue? I have the following code: wgts<-aggregate(subset(lendata,select=c(Length)),list(lendata$Cruise,len data$Station,lendata$Region,lendata$Total),mean) wgts<-wgts[order(wgts$Group.3,wgts$Group.1,wgts$Group.1),] names(wgts)<-c("Cruise","Station","Region","Total","MLen")

Data set up as one observation/subject looks like (with a total of 10 subjects) Two treatments: shoe type with 3 categories and region with 8 categories ==> 24 "treatment" columns Subject PHallux PMidToes PLatToe PMTH1 PMidMTH PLatMTH PMidfoot PRearfoot LHallux LMidToes LLatToe LMTH1 LMidMTH LLatMTH LMidfoot LRearfoot DHallux DMidToes DLatToe DMTH1 DMidMTH DLatMTH

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- ******************************************************************** The contents of this email are intended exclusively for the addressee. If you are not the addressee you must not read use or disclose the email contents ; you should notify us immediately [ by clicking "Reply" ] and delete this email. Nationwide monitors e-mails to ensure its systems

Hi everyone, I''m having some issues with a RoR app where webrick just completely crashes. No warnings, no errors - just *crash*! Doesn''t matter what I''m doing in the system, it just randomly craps out. I''ve checked the development.log file, and everything appears normal. The last few lines are: Rendering with layouts/scaffold Rendering account/login

First, my installation is samba 2.2.8 running as a daemon (not inetd) on Solaris 8 configured to use a WINS server and provide authentication via a PDC (same host as WINS server). I do have an lmhosts file in the samba /lib directory with the PDC/WINS server address in it. My globals section; [global] workgroup = WORKGROUP netbios name = SAMBASERVER security =

I am not sure if your problem is similar to what we have just experienced. we are using samba 2.2.3a-12.3 on debian with winxp sp1 clients we are using roaming profiles first logon after reboot fails sortof Windows cannot find a server copy of roaming profile will logon with local profile funny thing we never saw any activity in hostname.log (seperate smb.log for each machine) smbstatus showed

Good afternoon, In the code below, I have a set of functions (m1,m2,m3,s1,s2, and s3) which represent response surface designs for the mean and variance for three response variables, followed by an objective function that uses the "Big M" method to minimize variance (that is, push s1, s2, and s3 as close to 0 as possible) and hit targets for each of the three means (which are 0, 10,

#is there a way to get NA in the table of descriptive statistics instead of the function stopping Thank you in advance #data x.f <- structure(list(Site = structure(c(9L, 9L, 9L, 9L, 9L, 9L, 9L, 9L, 9L, 9L, 9L, 9L, 9L, 9L, 9L, 9L, 9L, 9L, 9L, 9L, 9L, 9L, 9L, 9L, 9L, 9L, 9L), .Label = c("BC", "HC", "RM119", "RM148", "RM179", "RM185",

Dear all R-users, I wanted to fit a Garch(1,1) model to a dataset by: >garch1 = garch(na.omit(dat)) But I got a warning message while executing, which is: >Warning message: >NaNs produced in: sqrt(pred$e) The garch parameters that I got are: > garch1 Call: garch(x = na.omit(dat)) Coefficient(s): a0 a1 b1 1.212e-04 1.001e+00 1.111e-14 Can any one

Using partials is a nice way to separate chunks of content into separate pages as opposed to building strings in helpers, but I''m wondering which is faster. It scares me when I see stuff like: Rendered users/_public (0.00051) Rendered users/_public (0.00009) Rendered users/_public (0.00008) Rendered users/_public (0.00008) Rendered users/_public (0.00008) ....50 more times Has anyone

This is an automatic message generated by the builder on builder-ubuntu for libguestfs. Log files from the build follow below. Linux builder-ubuntu 2.6.35-22-generic #35-Ubuntu SMP Sat Oct 16 20:45:36 UTC 2010 x86_64 GNU/Linux Fri Dec 31 23:00:01 GMT 2010 ----- + git pull --rebase git://git.annexia.org/git/libguestfs.git master >From git://git.annexia.org/git/libguestfs * branch