Anoop C S
2024-Jul-31 04:55 UTC
[Samba] ceph is disabled even if explicitly asked to be enabled
On Tue, 2024-07-30 at 21:12 +0300, Michael Tokarev via samba wrote:> Hi! > > Building current samba on debian bullseye with > > ?? ./configure --enable-cephfs > > results in the following output: > > Checking for header cephfs/libcephfs.h????????????? : yes > Checking for library cephfs???????????????????????? : yes > Checking for ceph_statx in cephfs?????????????????? : ok > Checking for ceph_openat in cephfs????????????????? : not found > Ceph support disabled due to --without-acl-support > ????????? or lack of ceph_statx/ceph_openat support > ... > > but despite --enable-cephfs option, ./configure succeeds and > subsequent > build succeeds too, just vfs/ceph.so etc aren't being produced. > > This seems like (configure) bug.I hope the description(and hyperlinked discussion) from https://gitlab.com/samba-team/samba/-/merge_requests/3715 explains the situation with upcoming v4.21 in detail. Basically we decided to go with the mandate of requiring certain APIs from libcephfs. Those APIs have been around since v17 and it is the least among the non-EOL(not archived) versions of Ceph as per?https://docs.ceph.com/en/latest/releases/#ceph-releases-index . Thanks, Anoop C S.
Michael Tokarev
2024-Jul-31 05:36 UTC
[Samba] ceph is disabled even if explicitly asked to be enabled
31.07.2024 07:55, Anoop C S via samba wrote:> On Tue, 2024-07-30 at 21:12 +0300, Michael Tokarev via samba wrote: >> Hi! >> >> Building current samba on debian bullseye with >> >> ?? ./configure --enable-cephfs >> >> results in the following output: >> >> Checking for header cephfs/libcephfs.h????????????? : yes >> Checking for library cephfs???????????????????????? : yes >> Checking for ceph_statx in cephfs?????????????????? : ok >> Checking for ceph_openat in cephfs????????????????? : not found >> Ceph support disabled due to --without-acl-support >> ????????? or lack of ceph_statx/ceph_openat support >> ... >> >> but despite --enable-cephfs option, ./configure succeeds and >> subsequent >> build succeeds too, just vfs/ceph.so etc aren't being produced. >> >> This seems like (configure) bug. > > I hope the description(and hyperlinked discussion) from > https://gitlab.com/samba-team/samba/-/merge_requests/3715 explains the > situation with upcoming v4.21 in detail. Basically we decided to go > with the mandate of requiring certain APIs from libcephfs. Those APIs > have been around since v17 and it is the least among the non-EOL(not > archived) versions of Ceph as > per?https://docs.ceph.com/en/latest/releases/#ceph-releases-index .The problem here is not requirement of a modern ceph - this is entirely okay. The problem is that ceph is disabled by configure even if it is explicitly enabled by the command-line switch. Configure should fail here instead of continuing, - *that* is the problem. Thanks, /mjt -- GPG Key transition (from rsa2048 to rsa4096) since 2024-04-24. New key: rsa4096/61AD3D98ECDF2C8E 9D8B E14E 3F2A 9DD7 9199 28F1 61AD 3D98 ECDF 2C8E Old key: rsa2048/457CE0A0804465C5 6EE1 95D1 886E 8FFB 810D 4324 457C E0A0 8044 65C5 Transition statement: http://www.corpit.ru/mjt/gpg-transition-2024.txt
Apparently Analagous Threads
- ceph is disabled even if explicitly asked to be enabled
- ceph is disabled even if explicitly asked to be enabled
- ceph is disabled even if explicitly asked to be enabled
- ceph is disabled even if explicitly asked to be enabled
- [ceph-users] dovecot + cephfs - sdbox vs mdbox