samba - May 2022 - Debian Bullseye samba 4.16.1 online (amd64/arm64/armhf/i386)

12.05.2022 17:19, L. van Belle via samba wrote:
> Hai,
> 
> As mentioned and later then normal.. Finaly there..
> Samba 4.16.1 is on my repo for debian Bullseye.
> You have choice these days, since the packages are now up2date
> 
> If you need profiling-data and/or Gnome tracker support.
> Then you use my repo  *( https supported).
Hi Louis!

Thank you for the good work!

What does the profiling data gives us?

Also, the tracker thing, -- what it is, and what it gives us?
Is it --enable-spotlight?

In another email, you wrote:

 > Few packages where in my test repo and that resulted in a version
numberein conflict
 > and this also applied to the official backport packages.

Which conflict is that?  There should not be more conflicts
in current bpo11 in bullseye-backports.

Samba 4.16.1+dfsg-4 landed in bullseye-backports today too,
I waited for it to migrate from unstable to testing before
uploading actual bpo11 version.  There was a backport of the
previous release already (4.16.1+dfsg-3) but that one had 2
issues which I had to fix.

Thanks!

/mjt

Hai Michael, 

Some monitoring tools need the option in d/rules --with-profiling-data 
https://learn.netdata.cloud/docs/agent/collectors/python.d.plugin/samba/ 

https://packages.debian.org/bullseye/netdata 
I know there are users using my repo specialy for this. 

All I added to d/rules here is :  
        --with-profiling-data

This one is save to enable. 

The other part.  Gnome tracker support 
https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Spotlight_with_Gnome_Tracker_Backend 

in the beginning, when trackers was added, we needed. 
        libtracker-sparql-2.0-dev and libtracker-miner-2.0-dev 

This is one I discussed with Matteu, and he decided that it was pulling in
to much extra depends. 
so it was desiced not to enable it. Meanwhile, I did have people asking for
it. 
So, I enabled it some time ago in my repo packages. 

I reviewed above wiki page again, and noticed libtracker-miner was dropped. 
I do see spotlight enabled, in current builds, only these don't support
Gnome backends. 

now, may its time to check what changed in all build depends, 
im pretty sure you already reduced these.  

to enable this one, just enable : libtracker-sparql-2.0-dev in build
depends. 

These 2 changes are for now the only changes I make.

Last on these build depends conflicts.. 

I use multiple repos to build my packages.. 
basicly its. 
bullseye
Bullseye-backuports
vanBelle Online 
vanBelle Internal1-test
vanBelle Internal2-dev

one package (ldb) was builded already and in one of my internal repos. 
that one was pulled in from 2-dev repo and builded samba with. 
that shouldn't have happened, human error.. 
It conflicts with the backports version. 

The test also pulled it in so I didn't notice it, just I already removed
these
 test-dev packages from my upload tree.. 
arrh..  So no error on your side.  

And cant say it enough...  
THANKS for all the work you done. 


So far, 

Greetz, 

Louis

> -----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
> Van: samba Namens Michael Tokarev via samba
> Verzonden: vrijdag 13 mei 2022 10:51
> Aan: belle at samba.org; samba at lists.samba.org
> Onderwerp: Re: [Samba] Debian Bullseye samba 4.16.1 online
> (amd64/arm64/armhf/i386)
> 
> 12.05.2022 17:19, L. van Belle via samba wrote:
> > Hai,
> >
> > As mentioned and later then normal.. Finaly there..
> > Samba 4.16.1 is on my repo for debian Bullseye.
> > You have choice these days, since the packages are now up2date
> >
> > If you need profiling-data and/or Gnome tracker support.
> > Then you use my repo  *( https supported).
> 
> Hi Louis!
> 
> Thank you for the good work!
> 
> What does the profiling data gives us?
> 
> Also, the tracker thing, -- what it is, and what it gives us?
> Is it --enable-spotlight?
> 
> In another email, you wrote:
> 
>  > Few packages where in my test repo and that resulted in a version
> numberein conflict  > and this also applied to the official backport
packages.
> 
> Which conflict is that?  There should not be more conflicts in current
bpo11 in
> bullseye-backports.
> 
> Samba 4.16.1+dfsg-4 landed in bullseye-backports today too, I waited for
it to
> migrate from unstable to testing before uploading actual bpo11 version.
> There was a backport of the previous release already (4.16.1+dfsg-3) but
that
> one had 2 issues which I had to fix.
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> /mjt
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
> instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba