Rowland penny
2020-Nov-17 15:43 UTC
[Samba] changes on DC not replicated, while showrepl reports no issues
On 17/11/2020 14:40, L.P.H. van Belle via samba wrote:> samba-tool visualize uptodateness -r > Does not show out of sync here. > > Rowland, you any ideas on that. > This might be just cosmetic.It appears it is just cosmetic, see my other post. I have asked the person who added it, why he added it, I don't expect a quick reply, he is on the other side of the planet ? Rowland
Rowland penny
2020-Nov-19 11:56 UTC
[Samba] changes on DC not replicated, while showrepl reports no issues
On 17/11/2020 15:43, Rowland penny via samba wrote:> On 17/11/2020 14:40, L.P.H. van Belle via samba wrote: >> samba-tool visualize uptodateness -r >> Does not show out of sync here. >> >> Rowland, you any ideas on that. >> This might be just cosmetic. > > It appears it is just cosmetic, see my other post. > > I have asked the person who added it, why he added it, I don't expect > a quick reply, he is on the other side of the planet ? > > RowlandOK, it is just cosmetic, seemingly a debug message. The unknown invocation ID's are from when a DC is removed and aren't used by Samba. The code to print them has now been removed from Samba master, so if it bothers anyone, I can explain just how to stop them being printed. Rowland
mj
2020-Nov-19 12:56 UTC
[Samba] changes on DC not replicated, while showrepl reports no issues
On 11/19/20 12:56 PM, Rowland penny via samba wrote:> > OK, it is just cosmetic, seemingly a debug message. The unknown > invocation ID's are from when a DC is removed and aren't used by Samba. > The code to print them has now been removed from Samba master, so if it > bothers anyone, I can explain just how to stop them being printed.Thanks for confirming. MJ