Robert Buck
2020-Oct-06 17:49 UTC
[Samba] Performance Question: Lots of Small Files vs One Large File
In an architecture where we have Samba running on RHEL exposing shares to Windows, when we have 1 large 1GB file, the write performance to storage is very fast, even over distances of 5000 miles. However, even writes to local Samba servers, with 100 10MB files being copied onto a shared drive, Windows Explorer is MUCH slower. I don't know if it's really Samba, but more than likely Windows. Does anyone on channel have experience with copying multiple small files onto shares? Are there any ways to make copying files onto a share faster? Thanks -- BOB BUCK SENIOR PLATFORM SOFTWARE ENGINEER SKIDMORE, OWINGS & MERRILL 7 WORLD TRADE CENTER 250 GREENWICH STREET NEW YORK, NY 10007 T (212) 298-9624 ROBERT.BUCK at SOM.COM
Christopher Wensink
2020-Oct-06 18:09 UTC
[Samba] Performance Question: Lots of Small Files vs One Large File
We had a similar issue that I fought for a while, and the issue was with the NIC Card settings on the PC's, Turn off energy efficient ethernet, Green Ethernet, set wake on magic packet? = disabled, turn off any other power saving modes on the NIC card. You can also try adjusting MTU settings, but leave it at the default of 1500 on both ends of the connection to start. Take some base benchmarks for transferring a 10MB file, a 100 MB file and a 1 GB file without changing anything, then make those changes on one PC, then test again with the same files, and reply back with the numbers. Chris On 10/6/2020 12:49 PM, Robert Buck via samba wrote:> In an architecture where we have Samba running on RHEL exposing shares to > Windows, when we have 1 large 1GB file, the write performance to storage is > very fast, even over distances of 5000 miles. However, even writes to local > Samba servers, with 100 10MB files being copied onto a shared drive, > Windows Explorer is MUCH slower. I don't know if it's really Samba, but > more than likely Windows. > > Does anyone on channel have experience with copying multiple small files > onto shares? Are there any ways to make copying files onto a share faster? > > Thanks >-- Christopher Wensink IS Administrator Five Star Plastics, Inc 1339 Continental Drive Eau Claire, WI 54701 Office: 715-831-1682 Mobile: 715-563-3112 Fax: 715-831-6075 cwensink at five-star-plastics.com www.five-star-plastics.com
Ralph Boehme
2020-Oct-06 18:39 UTC
[Samba] Performance Question: Lots of Small Files vs One Large File
Am 10/6/20 um 7:49 PM schrieb Robert Buck via samba:> In an architecture where we have Samba running on RHEL exposing shares to > Windows, when we have 1 large 1GB file, the write performance to storage is > very fast, even over distances of 5000 miles. However, even writes to local > Samba servers, with 100 10MB files being copied onto a shared drive, > Windows Explorer is MUCH slower. I don't know if it's really Samba, but > more than likely Windows. > > Does anyone on channel have experience with copying multiple small files > onto shares? Are there any ways to make copying files onto a share faster?to save you a lot rocking back and forth, yes, small files workloads will be slower. The smaller, the slower... :) -slow -- Ralph Boehme, Samba Team https://samba.org/ Samba Developer, SerNet GmbH https://sernet.de/en/samba/ GPG-Fingerprint FAE2C6088A24252051C559E4AA1E9B7126399E46 -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 833 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: <http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/attachments/20201006/ad99cac7/signature.sig>
Robert Buck
2020-Oct-06 19:11 UTC
[Samba] Performance Question: Lots of Small Files vs One Large File
Is this a protocol issue? A decade ago I saw writes to small files less than 16k were awful, because the cost of opening and other file ops dwarfed writing actual content. So very small files should be slow, but these files are 10mb each. Or is this a Windows issue? If so, what's causing the problem? Just trying to understand. On Tue, Oct 6, 2020 at 2:39 PM Ralph Boehme <slow at samba.org> wrote:> Am 10/6/20 um 7:49 PM schrieb Robert Buck via samba: > > In an architecture where we have Samba running on RHEL exposing shares to > > Windows, when we have 1 large 1GB file, the write performance to storage > is > > very fast, even over distances of 5000 miles. However, even writes to > local > > Samba servers, with 100 10MB files being copied onto a shared drive, > > Windows Explorer is MUCH slower. I don't know if it's really Samba, but > > more than likely Windows. > > > > Does anyone on channel have experience with copying multiple small files > > onto shares? Are there any ways to make copying files onto a share > faster? > > to save you a lot rocking back and forth, yes, small files workloads > will be slower. The smaller, the slower... :) > > -slow > > -- > Ralph Boehme, Samba Team https://samba.org/ > Samba Developer, SerNet GmbH https://sernet.de/en/samba/ > GPG-Fingerprint FAE2C6088A24252051C559E4AA1E9B7126399E46 > > --BOB BUCK SENIOR PLATFORM SOFTWARE ENGINEER SKIDMORE, OWINGS & MERRILL 7 WORLD TRADE CENTER 250 GREENWICH STREET NEW YORK, NY 10007 T (212) 298-9624 ROBERT.BUCK at SOM.COM
Reasonably Related Threads
- Performance Question: Lots of Small Files vs One Large File
- Performance Question: Lots of Small Files vs One Large File
- Performance Question: Lots of Small Files vs One Large File
- Performance regression of Windows clients?
- Performance regression of Windows clients?