On 20/05/2019 18:54, Hendrik Friedel wrote:> Hello, > >> Is btrfs becoming more common ? > In my impression: Yes. Also, this problem seems to affect also zfs and > thus all (?) file systems that support checksums and scrubbing in > linux; consequently all filesystems that are the choice of users who > need this for ensuring data consistency.Not from my experience, but, hey, what do I know ;-)>> You posted this: >> I am using Openmediavault (debian based NAS distribution), which is >> not actively supporting btrfs >> It is this that I was referring to. > Ah, yes. > OMV intended to move to btrfs as the only choice with the next > version. In order to pave the way, I intended to be an early adopter. > The problem I report here, that there is good reason to.For you perhaps, but if OMV will not help, well......> > >> I suggest you sit down with a copy of 'man smb.conf' and remove all >> the default > My intent is not to solve *my* problem, but to make developers aware > of this issue and help getting this issue fixed. > > I feel a bit helpless though, as I perceive a lack of interest... > I mean... This Bug is now celebrating its 5th aniversary. > https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10541That sort of says a lot, if it was that big a problem and multiple users were complaining, then it probably would get fixed, but there are only so many developers and they have only so much time available to fix things and add new features, so the most important things get fixed first. We do, however, accept patches to fix things, so perhaps you can get together with OMV and fix it from your end ;-) Rowland
Hello,>>>You posted this: >>>I am using Openmediavault (debian based NAS distribution), which is not actively supporting btrfs >>>It is this that I was referring to. >>Ah, yes. >>OMV intended to move to btrfs as the only choice with the next version. In order to pave the way, I intended to be an early adopter. The problem I report here, that there is good reason to. >For you perhaps, but if OMV will not help, well......What do you mean? [there was a 'shows' missing. It shoult have read 'shows that there is good reas on to']>That sort of says a lot, if it was that big a problem and multiple users were complaining, then it probably would get fixed, but there are only so many developers and they have only so much time available to fix things and add new features, so the most important things get fixed first. We do, however, accept patches to fix things, so perhaps you can get together with OMV and fix it from your end ;-)I fear, that's beyond my skills. Well, I did my best. Greetings, Hendrik
On 20/05/2019 19:47, Hendrik Friedel wrote:> Hello, > >>>> You posted this: >>>> I am using Openmediavault (debian based NAS distribution), which is >>>> not actively supporting btrfs >>>> It is this that I was referring to. >>> Ah, yes. >>> OMV intended to move to btrfs as the only choice with the next >>> version. In order to pave the way, I intended to be an early >>> adopter. The problem I report here, that there is good reason to. >> For you perhaps, but if OMV will not help, well...... > What do you mean? [there was a 'shows' missing. It shoult have read > 'shows that there is good reas on to'] >What I was trying to say was (and failing, it would seem), this is a two way street and if OMV cannot/will not help you, then it is hard to fix, especially now that Jeremy has pointed out that it cannot be fixed as is. Now this doesn't mean it can never be fixed, throw enough money and man hours at it and a workaround can probably be found, but this would undoubtedly entail OMV getting involved .>> That sort of says a lot, if it was that big a problem and multiple >> users were complaining, then it probably would get fixed, but there >> are only so many developers and they have only so much time available >> to fix things and add new features, so the most important things get >> fixed first. We do, however, accept patches to fix things, so perhaps >> you can get together with OMV and fix it from your end ;-) > I fear, that's beyond my skills. > > Well, I did my best.At least I hope you can understand why some bug reports seem to take forever to get fixed, it is all down to priorities, the highest priority ones get fixed first, unless one annoys a user enough that they put their hand in their pocket and they pay someone to get it fixed. Rowland