Hi all, the filesystem ext4 is a buggy witch support of the acl? I optaid of the btrfs filesystem and i 'm very well. Marco -- It support specialist cell: 3388192313
On Mon, 4 Mar 2019 18:35:50 +0100 marco pirola via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote:> Hi all, the filesystem ext4 is a buggy witch support of the acl? I > optaid of the btrfs filesystem and i 'm very well. > > Marco >I think he means that he couldn't make ext4 work for him, but btrfs does :-) ext4 is not buggy. Rowland
Rowald, one information: what filesystem do you use on the servers in production? Thanks a lot Marco Il 04/03/2019 18:50, Rowland Penny via samba ha scritto:> On Mon, 4 Mar 2019 18:35:50 +0100 > marco pirola via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > >> Hi all, the filesystem ext4 is a buggy witch support of the acl? I >> optaid of the btrfs filesystem and i 'm very well. >> >> Marco >> > I think he means that he couldn't make ext4 work for him, but btrfs > does :-) > > ext4 is not buggy. > > Rowland >-- It support specialist cell: 3388192313
> Hi all, the filesystem ext4 is a buggy witch support of the acl? I > optaid of the btrfs filesystem and i 'm very well. >I used ext4 in Samba servers for a very long time and never found any bugs in it. You know, sometimes we tend to blame other people or other things for our own flaws or misunderstandings...