Karolin Seeger
2016-Dec-19 09:18 UTC
[Announce] Samba 4.5.3, 4.4.8 and 4.3.13 Security Releases Available for Download
Release Announcements
---------------------
This is a security release in order to address the following CVEs:
o CVE-2016-2123 (Samba NDR Parsing ndr_pull_dnsp_name Heap-based Buffer
Overflow Remote Code Execution Vulnerability).
o CVE-2016-2125 (Unconditional privilege delegation to Kerberos servers in
trusted realms).
o CVE-2016-2126 (Flaws in Kerberos PAC validation can trigger privilege
elevation).
Please note that the patch for CVE-2016-2126 breaks the build with MIT
Kerberos in Samba 4.4.8 and 4.4.13. Samba 4.5.3 is not affected.
A patch for this issue is available for Samba 4.4 and 4.3 here:
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12471
Additionally, you might run into severe issues when running an AD DC with idmap
settings for member servers (by mistake) and you are upgrading from the last
security release. This invalid configuration (e.g. idmap config * : range 100000
- 33554431 and similar lines) was ignored formerly and leads to errors
now. The typical error you see is NT_STATUS_INVALID_SID.
For more details, please see the following bug:
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12410
If you're a vendor and would like to ignore this again
via a source code change, also have a look at:
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12155#c20
======Details
======
o CVE-2016-2123:
The Samba routine ndr_pull_dnsp_name contains an integer wrap problem,
leading to an attacker-controlled memory overwrite. ndr_pull_dnsp_name
parses data from the Samba Active Directory ldb database. Any user
who can write to the dnsRecord attribute over LDAP can trigger this
memory corruption.
By default, all authenticated LDAP users can write to the dnsRecord
attribute on new DNS objects. This makes the defect a remote privilege
escalation.
o CVE-2016-2125
Samba client code always requests a forwardable ticket
when using Kerberos authentication. This means the
target server, which must be in the current or trusted
domain/realm, is given a valid general purpose Kerberos
"Ticket Granting Ticket" (TGT), which can be used to
fully impersonate the authenticated user or service.
o CVE-2016-2126
A remote, authenticated, attacker can cause the winbindd process
to crash using a legitimate Kerberos ticket due to incorrect
handling of the arcfour-hmac-md5 PAC checksum.
A local service with access to the winbindd privileged pipe can
cause winbindd to cache elevated access permissions.
#######################################
Reporting bugs & Development Discussion
#######################################
Please discuss this release on the samba-technical mailing list or by
joining the #samba-technical IRC channel on irc.freenode.net.
If you do report problems then please try to send high quality
feedback. If you don't provide vital information to help us track down
the problem then you will probably be ignored. All bug reports should
be filed under the "Samba 4.1 and newer" product in the project's
Bugzilla
database (https://bugzilla.samba.org/).
======================================================================= Our
Code, Our Bugs, Our Responsibility.
== The Samba Team
=====================================================================
===============Download Details
===============
The uncompressed tarballs and patch files have been signed
using GnuPG (ID 6F33915B6568B7EA). The source code can be downloaded
from:
https://download.samba.org/pub/samba/stable/
Patches addressing this defect have been posted to
https://www.samba.org/samba/history/security.html
The release notes are available online at:
https://www.samba.org/samba/history/samba-4.5.3.html
https://www.samba.org/samba/history/samba-4.4.8.html
https://www.samba.org/samba/history/samba-4.3.13.html
Our Code, Our Bugs, Our Responsibility.
(https://bugzilla.samba.org/)
--Enjoy
The Samba Team
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 181 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL:
<http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-announce/attachments/20161219/6b4e9e37/signature.sig>
Mike Lykov
2016-Dec-19 09:56 UTC
[Samba] [Announce] Samba 4.5.3, 4.4.8 and 4.3.13 Security Releases Available for Download
19.12.2016 13:18, Karolin Seeger via samba пишет:> 100000 - 33554431 and similar lines) was ignored formerly and leads to errors > now. The typical error you see is NT_STATUS_INVALID_SID. > For more details, please see the following bug: > > https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12410What is right configuration in this case? on DC I have only an idmap_ldb:use rfc2307 = yes string in my smb.conf, and on member server I have an idmap config *:backend = tdb idmap config *:range = 30001-40000 idmap config SAMGES:backend = ad idmap config SAMGES:schema_mode = rfc2307 idmap config SAMGES:range = 10000-20000 winbind nss info = rfc2307 winbind trusted domains only = no winbind use default domain = yes winbind enum users = yes winbind enum groups = yes Are this is correct? I have an old 4.1* version and plan to upgrade to 4.5*. -- Mike Lykov, system administrator
Rowland Penny
2016-Dec-19 10:22 UTC
[Samba] [Announce] Samba 4.5.3, 4.4.8 and 4.3.13 Security Releases Available for Download
On Mon, 19 Dec 2016 13:56:41 +0400 Mike Lykov via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote:> 19.12.2016 13:18, Karolin Seeger via samba пишет: > > > 100000 - 33554431 and similar lines) was ignored formerly and leads > > to errors now. The typical error you see is NT_STATUS_INVALID_SID. > > For more details, please see the following bug: > > > > https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12410 > > What is right configuration in this case? > > on DC I have only an > idmap_ldb:use rfc2307 = yes > > string in my smb.conf, and > > on member server I have an > > idmap config *:backend = tdb > idmap config *:range = 30001-40000 > idmap config SAMGES:backend = ad > idmap config SAMGES:schema_mode = rfc2307 > idmap config SAMGES:range = 10000-20000 > > winbind nss info = rfc2307 > winbind trusted domains only = no > winbind use default domain = yes > winbind enum users = yes > winbind enum groups = yes > > > Are this is correct? > I have an old 4.1* version and plan to upgrade to 4.5*. >The only possible problems I can see there are the 'winbind enum' lines, you should only set these for testing purposes. The problem was that people have been setting the 'idmap config' lines meant for a domain member on AD DCs. On versions before 4.5.0, they were ignored and did nothing. From 4.5.0, they still do not affect the IDs, but now cause errors, these errors have now been fixed in 4.5.3 Rowland
Reasonably Related Threads
- [Announce] Samba 4.5.3, 4.4.8 and 4.3.13 Security Releases Available for Download
- [Announce] Samba 4.5.3, 4.4.8 and 4.3.13 Security Releases Available for Download
- [Announce] Samba 4.5.3, 4.4.8 and 4.3.13 Security Releases Available for Download
- group policy update fails
- group policy update fails