Volker Lendecke
2016-Oct-11 07:24 UTC
[Samba] a question about tdb record backup for ctdb failover
sun yekuan via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> writes:> OK, thank you! I have another question: > > what the current CTDB have done for transparent failover ? achieved fully or partially? > if CTDB has not achieved fully, what else we should do ?Fully transparent failover not only a ctdb task. Samba is involved too. We need persistent file handles with guarantees, a task that is not done yet. See https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Samba3/SMB3#Persistent_File_Handles for ideas. With best regards, Volker Lendecke
sun yekuan
2016-Oct-11 10:40 UTC
[Samba] a question about tdb record backup for ctdb failover
ok, thank you! Except witness, what else should CTDB do for supportting transparent failover? With best regards From: Volker Lendecke<mailto:vl at samba.org> Date: 2016-10-11 15:24 To: sun yekuan via samba<mailto:samba at lists.samba.org> CC: Amitay Isaacs<mailto:amitay at gmail.com>; sun yekuan<mailto:sunyekuan at outlook.com> Subject: Re: [Samba] a question about tdb record backup for ctdb failover sun yekuan via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> writes:> OK, thank you! I have another question: > > what the current CTDB have done for transparent failover ? achieved fully or partially? > if CTDB has not achieved fully, what else we should do ?Fully transparent failover not only a ctdb task. Samba is involved too. We need persistent file handles with guarantees, a task that is not done yet. See https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Samba3/SMB3#Persistent_File_Handles for ideas. With best regards, Volker Lendecke
Volker Lendecke
2016-Oct-11 11:46 UTC
[Samba] a question about tdb record backup for ctdb failover
sun yekuan <sunyekuan at outlook.com> writes:> ok, thank you! > > Except witness, what else should CTDB do for supportting transparent > failover?ctdb needs to develop a database model to distribute persistent handle information across nodes. For larger clusters, this will probably also require to introduce failover groups, you don't want to broadcast persistent handle information everywhere. This needs to be developed closely together with Samba, because right now Samba has no notion of persistent handles. As you know, patches for persistent handles are already floating around on the lists, but these need to be polished and integrated into Samba. Volker
Reasonably Related Threads
- a question about tdb record backup for ctdb failover
- a question about tdb record backup for ctdb failover
- a question about tdb record backup for ctdb failover
- How to reach partially online state in ctdb cluster
- [Announce] CTDB release 2.0 is ready for download