On 17/11/14 10:36, Jakub Kulesza wrote:> Hi! I have successfully managed to migrate my samba 3 NT domain from gentoo
> to a fully operational samba 4 AD on Ubuntu 14.04 LTS with roaming
> profiles, MMC management and what not. Over 50 users log into that daily.
>
> I've got a number of problems, but let's tackle them one by one.
>
> When I try to use smbstatus to check who is using the server and what files
> are being open, I'm getting:
> [CODE]
> # smbstatus
>
> Samba version 4.1.6-Ubuntu
> PID Username Group Machine
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Service pid machine Connected at
> -------------------------------------------------------
>
> /var/run/samba/locking.tdb not initialised
> This is normal if an SMB client has never connected to your server.
> [/CODE]
>
> [LIST]
> [*] I cannot find locking.tdb in any of the samba directories,
> [*] locking is enabled in smb.conf
> [/LIST]
>
> I've tried googling, with no results.
>
> My smb.conf:
> [CODE][global]
> workgroup = GPMV
> realm = my.realm.dot.com
> netbios name = PDC
> server role = active directory domain controller
> idmap_ldb:use rfc2307 = yes
> dns forwarder = 192.168.0.252
> server services = rpc, nbt, wrepl, ldap, cldap, kdc, drepl, winbind,
> ntp_signd, kcc, dnsupdate, dns, smb
> dcerpc endpoint servers = epmapper, wkssvc, rpcecho, samr, netlogon,
> lsarpc, spoolss, drsuapi, dssetup, unixinfo, browser, eventlog6, backupkey,
> dnsserver, winreg, srvsvc
> client use spnego = yes
>
> locking = yes
>
>
> [netlogon]
> path = /var/local/samba/var/lib/samba/netlogon
> #path = /var/lib/samba/sysvol/biuro.gpm-vindexus.pl/scripts
> read only = No
>
> [sysvol]
> path = /var/lib/samba/sysvol
> read only = No
>
> [profiles]
> path = /var/local/samba/var/lib/samba/profiles
> read only = no
> browseable = no
>
> [some other shares follow]
> [/CODE]
>
> What can you suggest? What can I check? Or maybe latest samba does not
> write locks to disk and stores them in memory to be read by some other
tool?
>
OK, two things pop out at me, you seem to be using the AD DC as a
fileserver, this is not recommended, secondly, you seem to be using the
'ntvfs server' instead of the 's3fs server'.
Rowland