Thanks for the quick response.
So I guess if you wanted high availability, you would either have to
implement a PDC/BDC solution with samba4 or use samba4 on top of a
corosync/pacemaker cluster. Is this correct?
br,
Quinn
On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 10:43 AM, G?mes G?za <geza at kzsdabas.hu> wrote:
> 2012-07-11 10:27 keltez?ssel, Quinn Plattel ?rta:
>
> Question: Right now samba4 is great as in all-in-one solution (samba,
>> kerberos, ldap, dns) into one service.
>> Is it possible to split it up so that for example, I run openldap on
one
>> server, kerberos on another server, and then dns/samba on a third
server?
>>
>> br,
>> Quinn
>>
> Short answer: NO
> Longer: Windows clients expect kerberos, ldap and samba rpc+filesharing
> services on the same host, so if you need AD functionality you couldn't
> separate them. They also expect a schema (the AD schema) which is
> incompatible with OpenLDAP.
>
> Regards
>
> Geza
>
>
--
Best regards/Med venlig hilsen,
Quinn Plattel