Hello all, I have a question concerning the installation of samba-2.2.3a on a RedHat 7.2 installed system in combination with the configure option --with-pam. When I configure samba using the following options: ./configure --prefix=/usr --libdir=/etc --with-lockdir=/var/lock/samba --with-privatedir=/etc --with-swatdir=/usr/share/swat --with-pam --with-mmap the output doesn't present any errors. But when I compile using make all I receive errors like 'PAM_AUTHTOK_ERR' undeclared. This should be no problem because I installed the package: pam-devel-0.75-19. This package produces the libs and headerfiles which contain the used defines. When reading again the configure file I read that the following option was disables: 'checking for security/pam_modules.h (cached no) Could that be the problem. THNX for all. Frank Litjens.
>When reading again the configure file I read that the following optionwas disables: >'checking for security/pam_modules.h (cached no) >Could that be the problem. No....cached simply means has configure found it before....it will use the value cached (yes or no) before checking the system again. One of the includes is fubar'd someplace.... make sure you have these files for sure: /usr/include/security/_pam_compat.h /usr/include/security/_pam_types.h Good luck! flitjens wrote:> Hello all, > > I have a question concerning the installation of samba-2.2.3a on a > RedHat 7.2 installed system in combination with the configure option > --with-pam. > > When I configure samba using the following options: > > ./configure --prefix=/usr --libdir=/etc --with-lockdir=/var/lock/samba > --with-privatedir=/etc --with-swatdir=/usr/share/swat --with-pam > --with-mmap > > the output doesn't present any errors. > > But when I compile using make all I receive errors like > > 'PAM_AUTHTOK_ERR' undeclared. > > This should be no problem because I installed the package: > > pam-devel-0.75-19. > > This package produces the libs and headerfiles which contain the used > defines. > > When reading again the configure file I read that the following option > was disables: > > 'checking for security/pam_modules.h (cached no) > > Could that be the problem. > > THNX for all. > > Frank Litjens. > > > > > > >-- Terry Davis http://approbation.org/