Hi -- Does anyone have any strong comments either positively or negatively about the new version 2.2.2 running on Solaris 2.7 or 2.6? I have been running version 2.2.1 since August and have been having some really unusual behavior with random denial for some users from some machines at random times. Is there any evidence that 2.2.2 might help with this? -- ________________________________________________ Karyn Joseph EIT - Agoura, CA UNIX Administrator 818/874-6116 ________________________________________________
At 01:37 PM 14/11/2001 -0800, Karyn Joseph wrote:>Does anyone have any strong comments either >positively or negatively about the new version 2.2.2 >running on Solaris 2.7 or 2.6?On Solaris 2.8 I was having all sorts of problems with a number of versions prior to 2.2.2 (logins, runaway processes, corrupted connections table etc). Using 2.2.2 has solved ALL of them. Use it :-) Tim -- Tim Villa, Network / Systems Administrator Faculties of Economics & Commerce, Education and Law The University of Western Australia Phone: +61-8-9380-1796, Fax: +61-8-9380-1068 Mail <mailto:tvilla@cyllene.uwa.edu.au> WWW <http://buck.ecel.uwa.edu.au/>
I, too, have been experiencing random denial of random machines, but I'm running samba 2.2.0 on this server. Linux coffee.westmont.edu 2.2.14 #5 SMP Tue Feb 8 18:57:15 PST 2000 i686 unknown Odd. John On Wed, 14 Nov 2001, Karyn Joseph wrote:> Hi -- > > Does anyone have any strong comments either > positively or negatively about the new version 2.2.2 > running on Solaris 2.7 or 2.6? > > I have been running version 2.2.1 since August and > have been having some really unusual behavior with > random denial for some users from some machines at > random times. Is there any evidence that 2.2.2 > might help with this? > >-- John Rodkey, Information Technology, Westmont College rodkey@westmont.edu
On Wed, 14 Nov 2001, Karyn Joseph wrote:> Hi -- > > Does anyone have any strong comments either > positively or negatively about the new version 2.2.2 > running on Solaris 2.7 or 2.6? > > I have been running version 2.2.1 since August and > have been having some really unusual behavior with > random denial for some users from some machines at > random times. Is there any evidence that 2.2.2 > might help with this?Please do not randomly cross post. Thanks. cheers, jerry --------------------------------------------------------------------- www.samba.org SAMBA Team jerry_at_samba.org www.plainjoe.org jerry_at_plainjoe.org http://www.hp.com Hewlett-Packard --"I never saved anything for the swim back." Ethan Hawk in Gattaca--
Karyn Joseph wrote:> Does anyone have any strong comments either > positively or negatively about the new version 2.2.2 > running on Solaris 2.7 or 2.6?The main problem we've had so far is that compared to good ole 1.9.18p10, the RAM footprint is nearly doubled - is that other people's impression too? We're seeing 2.5 to 3 mb on 1.9 against best part of 5mb on 2.2.2 on Solaris 8. Are we doing something wrong? Cheers, Martin -- Martin Sapsed To have no errors Information Services Would be life without meaning University of Wales, Bangor, LL57 2UX No struggle, no joy. Fax: +44 (0)1248 383826
On Wed, 2001-11-14 at 20:34, Tim Villa wrote:> At 01:37 PM 14/11/2001 -0800, Karyn Joseph wrote: > >Does anyone have any strong comments either > >positively or negatively about the new version 2.2.2 > >running on Solaris 2.7 or 2.6? > > On Solaris 2.8 I was having all sorts of problems with a number of versions > prior to 2.2.2 (logins, runaway processes, corrupted connections table > etc). Using 2.2.2 has solved ALL of them. Use it :-) >This is pretty consistent with what I am seeing. There is a potential locking problem with Office 97 on Win2k, but the user that complains has been somewhat unresponsive... Mike
If you use Office 97, be sure you install Office 97 Service Pack 2, the first release of Office 97 had alot of locking problems. /Matt> -----Original Message----- > From: samba-admin@lists.samba.org [mailto:samba-admin@lists.samba.org]On > Behalf Of Mike Gerdts > Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 8:01 AM > To: Tim Villa > Cc: Karyn.Joseph@teradyne.com; samba@lists.samba.org; > samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org; Samba Technical Mailing List > Subject: Re: issues with version 2.2.2 > > > On Wed, 2001-11-14 at 20:34, Tim Villa wrote: > > At 01:37 PM 14/11/2001 -0800, Karyn Joseph wrote: > > >Does anyone have any strong comments either > > >positively or negatively about the new version 2.2.2 > > >running on Solaris 2.7 or 2.6? > > > > On Solaris 2.8 I was having all sorts of problems with a number > of versions > > prior to 2.2.2 (logins, runaway processes, corrupted connections table > > etc). Using 2.2.2 has solved ALL of them. Use it :-) > > > > This is pretty consistent with what I am seeing. There is a potential > locking problem with Office 97 on Win2k, but the user that complains has > been somewhat unresponsive... > > Mike > > > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the > instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba >