Here's an easy one for y'all.  I am running samba V1.9.16p1 on an NT 4.0
vs. Solrais 2.51 peer to peer, and so
far so good.  !BUT!  I am about to go to Solaris 2.6.  Is there anything
different that must be done for samba
on this newer Solaris version?
thanks-
john
"...you can't stop progress, but you can help redefine it."
    -anonymous
"angels hang their socks on the moon"
    -tobin sprout
--
John Hintz
GIS Analyst
Nez Perce Tribe
Land Services Division
Lapwai, ID 83540
ph#  (208)843-7392
fax# (208)843-7391
johnh@nezperce.org (John Hintz) wrote:> Here's an easy one for y'all. I am running samba V1.9.16p1 on an NT 4.0 vs. Solrais 2.51 peer to peer, and so > far so good. !BUT! I am about to go to Solaris 2.6. Is there anything different that must be done for samba > on this newer Solaris version?Nothing at all (;-)) Samba passes Appcert with flying colours: see http://www.sun.com/developers/comarketing/solbrand/app-cert.html I would get an up-to-date copy, though: 1.9.18 or so: the gurus can advise you on that. --dave (I ran it through a few months back) c-b -- David Collier-Brown, | Always do right. This will gratify some people 185 Ellerslie Ave., | and astonish the rest. -- Mark Twain Willowdale, Ontario | davecb@hobbes.ss.org, canada.sun.com M2N 1Y3. 416-223-8968 | http://java.science.yorku.ca/~davecb
Maybe Matching Threads
- Problem with transfering files between Solaris and HPUX 11.00
- Samba 2.2.5 Security Bug?
- Upgrade from UFS Sol 10u5 to ZFS Sol 10u6/OS 2008.11[SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
- Would validation w/o ActiveRecord have clean sol''n?
- I/O performance problems on Dell 1850 w/ PERC 4e/Si RAID1 (Sol 10U6)