Tried sending this to rubyinstaller-devel and it said it was moderated
because of too big. Trying again with smaller size :)
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Roger Pack <rogerdpack at gmail.com>
Date: Wed, May 27, 2009 at 6:48 AM
Subject: bug reports
To: For RubyInstaller Developers <rubyinstaller-devel at rubyforge.org>
currently if you run make test-all with the 1.8.6 branch, you get:
?1) Failure:
test_reorganize(TestGDBM) [../ruby_1_8/test/gdbm/test_gdbm.rb:591]:
<true> expected but was
<false>.
?2) Failure:
test_s_open_create_new(TestGDBM) [../ruby_1_8/test/gdbm/test_gdbm.rb:84]:
<420> expected but was
<438>.
?3) Failure:
test_del_trailing_separator_25(TestPathname)
[../ruby_1_8/test/pathname/test_pathname.rb:27]:
del_trailing_separator("\225\\\\").
<"\225\\"> expected but was
<"\225">.
?4) Failure:
test_should_propagate_signaled(TestBeginEndBlock)
[../ruby_1_8/test/ruby/test_beginendblock.rb:83]:
<nil> expected but was
<3>.
?5) Failure:
test_cgi(TestWEBrickCGI)
? ?[../ruby_1_8/test/webrick/test_cgi.rb:27:in `test_cgi''
? ? D:/dev/downloads/oneclick186_lavena/sandbox/ruby_1_8/lib/net/http.rb:1053:in
`request''
? ? D:/dev/downloads/oneclick186_lavena/sandbox/ruby_1_8/lib/net/http.rb:2136:in
`reading_body''
? ? D:/dev/downloads/oneclick186_lavena/sandbox/ruby_1_8/lib/net/http.rb:1052:in
`request''
? ? D:/dev/downloads/oneclick186_lavena/sandbox/ruby_1_8/lib/net/http.rb:1037:in
`request''
? ? D:/dev/downloads/oneclick186_lavena/sandbox/ruby_1_8/lib/net/http.rb:543:in
`start''
? ? D:/dev/downloads/oneclick186_lavena/sandbox/ruby_1_8/lib/net/http.rb:1035:in
`request''
? ? ../ruby_1_8/test/webrick/test_cgi.rb:26:in `test_cgi''
? ? ../ruby_1_8/test/webrick/utils.rb:38:in `call''
? ? ../ruby_1_8/test/webrick/utils.rb:38:in `start_server''
? ? ../ruby_1_8/test/webrick/utils.rb:46:in `start_httpserver''
? ? ../ruby_1_8/test/webrick/test_cgi.rb:17:in `test_cgi'']:
<"/\244\333\244\262/\244\333\244\262"> expected but was
<"/\017U\017\375/\017U\017\375">.
are any of these important or of concern to us?
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Also, for curiosity sake, here''s the 1.9 make test-all output (after
deleting test_io.rb and test_fiber.rb)
6050 tests, 2510241 assertions, 40 failures, 89 errors, 7 skips
Do you think I should submit these all to core?
-=r
On Mon, Jun 1, 2009 at 1:09 PM, Roger Pack <rogerdpack at gmail.com> wrote:> Tried sending this to rubyinstaller-devel and it said it was moderated > because of too big. Trying again with smaller size :) > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: Roger Pack <rogerdpack at gmail.com> > Date: Wed, May 27, 2009 at 6:48 AM > Subject: bug reports > To: For RubyInstaller Developers <rubyinstaller-devel at rubyforge.org> > > > currently if you run make test-all with the 1.8.6 branch, you get: > > ?1) Failure: > test_reorganize(TestGDBM) [../ruby_1_8/test/gdbm/test_gdbm.rb:591]: > <true> expected but was > <false>. > > ?2) Failure: > test_s_open_create_new(TestGDBM) [../ruby_1_8/test/gdbm/test_gdbm.rb:84]: > <420> expected but was > <438>. > > ?3) Failure: > test_del_trailing_separator_25(TestPathname) > [../ruby_1_8/test/pathname/test_pathname.rb:27]: > del_trailing_separator("\225\\\\"). > <"\225\\"> expected but was > <"\225">. > > ?4) Failure: > test_should_propagate_signaled(TestBeginEndBlock) > [../ruby_1_8/test/ruby/test_beginendblock.rb:83]: > <nil> expected but was > <3>. > > ?5) Failure: > test_cgi(TestWEBrickCGI) > ? ?[../ruby_1_8/test/webrick/test_cgi.rb:27:in `test_cgi'' > ? ? D:/dev/downloads/oneclick186_lavena/sandbox/ruby_1_8/lib/net/http.rb:1053:in > `request'' > ? ? D:/dev/downloads/oneclick186_lavena/sandbox/ruby_1_8/lib/net/http.rb:2136:in > `reading_body'' > ? ? D:/dev/downloads/oneclick186_lavena/sandbox/ruby_1_8/lib/net/http.rb:1052:in > `request'' > ? ? D:/dev/downloads/oneclick186_lavena/sandbox/ruby_1_8/lib/net/http.rb:1037:in > `request'' > ? ? D:/dev/downloads/oneclick186_lavena/sandbox/ruby_1_8/lib/net/http.rb:543:in > `start'' > ? ? D:/dev/downloads/oneclick186_lavena/sandbox/ruby_1_8/lib/net/http.rb:1035:in > `request'' > ? ? ../ruby_1_8/test/webrick/test_cgi.rb:26:in `test_cgi'' > ? ? ../ruby_1_8/test/webrick/utils.rb:38:in `call'' > ? ? ../ruby_1_8/test/webrick/utils.rb:38:in `start_server'' > ? ? ../ruby_1_8/test/webrick/utils.rb:46:in `start_httpserver'' > ? ? ../ruby_1_8/test/webrick/test_cgi.rb:17:in `test_cgi'']: > <"/\244\333\244\262/\244\333\244\262"> expected but was > <"/\017U\017\375/\017U\017\375">. > > are any of these important or of concern to us? > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Also, for curiosity sake, here''s the 1.9 make test-all output (after > deleting test_io.rb and test_fiber.rb) > > 6050 tests, 2510241 assertions, 40 failures, 89 errors, 7 skips > > Do you think I should submit these all to core? >You already submitted this to Ruby-core, saw your ticket/post last week. -- Luis Lavena AREA 17 - Perfection in design is achieved not when there is nothing more to add, but rather when there is nothing more to take away. Antoine de Saint-Exup?ry
>> 6050 tests, 2510241 assertions, 40 failures, 89 errors, 7 skips >> >> Do you think I should submit these all to core?Oh yeah I submitted the 1.8.6 bugs (since they were fairly few). My question was more "should I submit all 40 failures + 89 errors that ruby 1.9 make test-all generates" (I''ve submitted about 9 of them thus far). -=
On Mon, Jun 1, 2009 at 1:14 PM, Roger Pack <rogerdpack at gmail.com> wrote:>>> 6050 tests, 2510241 assertions, 40 failures, 89 errors, 7 skips >>> >>> Do you think I should submit these all to core? > > Oh yeah I submitted the 1.8.6 bugs (since they were fairly few). ?My > question was more "should I submit all 40 failures + 89 errors that > ruby 1.9 make test-all generates" (I''ve submitted about 9 of them thus > far). >They will just ignore them, like they did on the past with my bug reports. What will be better is component -by- component all the errors and see if they can be corrected. -- Luis Lavena AREA 17 - Perfection in design is achieved not when there is nothing more to add, but rather when there is nothing more to take away. Antoine de Saint-Exup?ry
> They will just ignore them, like they did on the past with my bug reports.Yeah they have definitely ignored many of mine in the past. They have fixed a few, which is nice -- the pthreads thing, and the test_time.rb failing.> What will be better is component -by- component all the errors and see > if they can be corrected.Do you mean grouping similar errors together as tickets? -=r