samba-bugs at samba.org
2016-Jun-15 20:16 UTC
[Bug 11978] New: mkstemp failed: File name too long (36) when filename is under the limit
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11978
Bug ID: 11978
Summary: mkstemp failed: File name too long (36) when filename
is under the limit
Product: rsync
Version: 3.1.1
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P5
Component: core
Assignee: wayned at samba.org
Reporter: sambabug1.nobled at spamgourmet.com
QA Contact: rsync-qa at samba.org
Using mkstemp adds on 7 characters to the filename, which creates a problem
when the filename is below, but close to, the limit of the filesystem.
You can see this when rsync'ing from one ecryptfs filesystem to another,
which
will fail even though both have the exact same 143-byte filename limit, if a
filename consists of more than 136 bytes.
Is there any reason the .XXXXXX in the argument to mkstemp can't *replace*
the
last 7 characters in the filename, instead of being appended to it?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
samba-bugs at samba.org
2016-Jun-15 20:27 UTC
[Bug 11978] mkstemp failed: File name too long (36) when filename is under the limit
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11978 --- Comment #1 from Syr <sambabug1.nobled at spamgourmet.com> --- https://git.samba.org/rsync.git/?p=rsync.git;a=blob;f=receiver.c;hb=3267d6a9ceeefad438080b17c02daa7775820803#l143 Wait, it actually adds 8 characters to it in total, there's a dot prepended at the beginning to. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.
samba-bugs at samba.org
2016-Jun-15 20:36 UTC
[Bug 11978] mkstemp failed: File name too long (36) when filename is under the limit
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11978 --- Comment #2 from Syr <sambabug1.nobled at spamgourmet.com> --- Triple post. Shouldn't it also use e.g. f_namelen from statfs() at runtime instead of a compile-time constant? And MAXPATHLEN doesn't even seem to reflect reality, since it's not actually limited to that on Linux. https://lists.debian.org/debian-hurd/2012/01/msg00166.html -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.
samba-bugs at samba.org
2018-Jun-25 11:08 UTC
[Bug 11978] mkstemp failed: File name too long (36) when filename is under the limit
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11978
Mauro Molinari <mauromol at tiscali.it> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |mauromol at tiscali.it
--- Comment #3 from Mauro Molinari <mauromol at tiscali.it> ---
I'm also encountering problems regarding mkstemp "file name too long
error"
when rsyncing to an ecryptfs filesystem. Probably, rsync should try to handle
this in a smarter way.
A secondary problem I see is that, even if this error is given, the whole file
is transferred from source to target anyway, although not actually saved on the
target. So, if the file is huge and the bandwidth is low, this is a serious
waste.
Using rsync 3.0.9 on local side (target) and rsync 3.1.1 on remote side
(source).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Reasonably Related Threads
- [Bug 68835] New: Unknown opcode 0x43 + protection fault on a Graphics Blaster Riva TNT card
- [Bug 74164] New: [NV04] Native monitor resolution missing
- [Bug 68854] New: [NV04] PROTECTION_ERROR / PROTECTION_FAULT
- [Bug 67161] New: Blank video after resuming from S3 or S4
- chooseCRANmirror