The advantage of rsync is that it saves tons of bandwidth by sending only
the changes.
For your use case, why not just use "scp -r" instead of rsync?
On Sat, Jun 18, 2011 at 12:31 PM, Andre Majorel <aym-2cnysr at
teaser.fr>wrote:
> Is there a way to make rsync unconditionally transfer files,
> i.e. create them anew even if the target already exists and is
> identical to the source ?
>
> rsync -I looks closer but still avoids transferring the files.
>
> --
> Andr? Majorel http://www.teaser.fr/~amajorel/
> --
> Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting the mailing list.
> To unsubscribe or change options:
> https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync
> Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
>
--
"The Fed is still under the assumption all they have to do to revive an
economy is blow a new bubble" -- Josh Rosner. Amen!
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/rsync/attachments/20110618/09f272db/attachment.html>