samba-bugs at samba.org
2011-Feb-15 02:20 UTC
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 7956] New: Don't error when attempting to delete a non-existent default ACL
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7956
Summary: Don't error when attempting to delete a non-existent
default ACL
Product: rsync
Version: 3.1.0
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: core
AssignedTo: wayned at samba.org
ReportedBy: chris at onthe.net.au
QAContact: rsync-qa at samba.org
When attempting to delete a default ACL an error return of ENODATA means there
wasn't a default ACL in the first place. Don't treat this as an error as
it
means we're now where we wanted to be, i.e. without a default ACL.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.samba.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
samba-bugs at samba.org
2011-Feb-15 02:23 UTC
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 7956] Don't error when attempting to delete a non-existent default ACL
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7956 ------- Comment #1 from chris at onthe.net.au 2011-02-14 20:23 CST ------- Created an attachment (id=6247) --> (https://bugzilla.samba.org/attachment.cgi?id=6247&action=view) Patch to fix deleting non-existent default ACL -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.samba.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
samba-bugs at samba.org
2011-Feb-15 02:34 UTC
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 7956] Don't error when attempting to delete a non-existent default ACL
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7956 ------- Comment #2 from matt at mattmccutchen.net 2011-02-14 20:34 CST ------- How can the situation arise? If it arises only by a concurrent modification to the destination, I don't care much. There are lots of ways rsync can mess up with concurrent modifications to the destination. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.samba.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
samba-bugs at samba.org
2011-Feb-15 03:14 UTC
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 7956] Don't error when attempting to delete a non-existent default ACL
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7956
chris at onthe.net.au changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution| |INVALID
------- Comment #3 from chris at onthe.net.au 2011-02-14 21:14 CST -------
I was seeing the error on an rsync -A into a fresh destination, where the
destination directory itself doesn't have a default ACL.
...doh! As it turns out, the error was because my destination filesystem
didn't
have ACLs enabled. Sorry for the noise!
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.samba.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
Possibly Parallel Threads
- DO NOT REPLY [Bug 7070] New: Permission denied message with --fake-super and permissionless directory
- DO NOT REPLY [Bug 7951] New: Option for case insensitivity in filter rules
- DO NOT REPLY [Bug 6965] New: truncated files and exit code 23
- DO NOT REPLY [Bug 6694] New: rsync -A drops mask from ACL
- acl handling on delete (performance problem)