Hello, I'm attempting to use the pre-xfer exec and post-xfer exec utilities to replace a complicated script which tails the rsync log and does A Bunch Of Stuff at the beginning and completion of rsync transfers. (It will also allow us to throw away a nasty hack which forces rsync to log the fact that is exiting - trying to provide a catch for /all/ possible exit conditions (ie, strings in the log file) seemed overwhelming.) However, my efforts are hampered by not knowing the name of the transferred file in the post-xfer script - the fine print says "RSYNC_REQUEST: (pre-xfer only)" This pair of config items is _almost_ perfect for managing all the wonderful things which we need to have done to freshly arrived files. As well, we have a situation where the state of the filesystem must be guaranteed unchanging whilst an rsync is in process (sending data), so we set a flag at the start of the transfer and remove it at the end. pre-exec is perfect for doing this, and so would be post-exec -- _if_ we knew which rsync had just completed!! Am I missing some trivial way to give this information to a post-exec script? Are there some logistical restrictions which would prevent me from (easily) modifying the rsync source to send this information to the post-exec script? cheers, Mike
On Fri, Sep 08, 2006 at 12:42:16PM +0800, Mike Daws wrote:> Am I missing some trivial way to give this information to a post-exec > script?The easiest thing to do with the current system is to use some kind of caching mechanism in the pre-xfer exec to note the RSYNC_REQUEST string for use in the post-xfer exec. Unfortunately, the best you can do with the information currently at hand is to cache based on a combination of fairly unique items, such as RSYNC_HOST_ADDR + RSYNC_USER_NAME + RSYNC_MODULE_NAME. (You can't use something like parent PID, because the pre-xfer exec isn't the child of the transfer PID.)> Are there some logistical restrictions which would prevent me from > (easily) modifying the rsync source to send this information to the > post-exec script?The xfer forks all happen prior to the process receiving the request info because it has already run chroot and changed the user permissions when starting the transfer. A special pipe is used to communicate the request info to the post-xfer process. There are several things that could be done to rsync to effect the change you want: 1. Use a similar pipe to communicate the info to the pre-xfer process. 2. Fork a single pre/post xfer process that uses the single pipe's info to setup the environment and then handles the pre- & post- xfer commands (using another sub-process for the pre-exec command if it needed to run both). 3. Change the code to not chroot & set user permissions until after the start of the transfer begins, making the code in this first part of the transfer critical to get right to avoid security bugs. I personally think that option 2 is a good choice and could be put into the current code without too much difficulty. ..wayne..
The way I have accomplished this is to modify the rsync request slightly and cache the modulename and request into a database. In my case, this provides me with a unique key in the database so I know the requests match up. On the client side I have added the top-level path into the request (e.g. rsync -optionshere /usr/bin username@backupserver::modulename/bin/). This is the only way I can get the path into the request but it does work. On the pre-xfer side I insert the modulename and path as well as other pertinent information. On the post-xfer side I fetch the record from the database matching the modulename and pull in the request value to get the path. A bit of a hack but it has worked for us to track all open connections to the rsync server and create a database of exit codes by module (user surrogate in our world) and path. Rob
Seemingly Similar Threads
- [Bug 13207] New: rsyncd doesn't send output of failed pre-xfer exec script to client
- pre-xfer exec fails in FreeBSD
- (when) does rsync daemon sync ?
- pre/post-xfer exec not executed ?
- Regarding an "earlier" variant of `pre-xfer exec` [feature request and proposed patch]