samba-bugs@samba.org
2006-Aug-17  19:59 UTC
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 4030] New: new option: --filelimit
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4030
           Summary: new option: --filelimit
           Product: rsync
           Version: 2.6.8
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: All
            Status: NEW
          Severity: enhancement
          Priority: P3
         Component: core
        AssignedTo: wayned@samba.org
        ReportedBy: vl@samba.org
         QAContact: rsync-qa@samba.org
I've got a server that gets backed up during normal operation. While the
rsync
sender is building up the file list, it saturates the disk subsystem with the
directory traversal which drives load due to other operations to silly heights.
The patch to follow implements a --filelimit=n option that limits the number of
files to be looked up per second, very similar to the --bwlimit option.
Volker
-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.samba.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
samba-bugs@samba.org
2006-Aug-17  19:59 UTC
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 4030] new option: --filelimit
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4030 ------- Comment #1 from vl@samba.org 2006-08-17 14:59 MST ------- Created an attachment (id=2096) --> (https://bugzilla.samba.org/attachment.cgi?id=2096&action=view) implementation of --filelimit -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.samba.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
samba-bugs@samba.org
2006-Aug-19  00:11 UTC
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 4030] new option: --filelimit
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4030 ------- Comment #2 from hashproduct+rsync@gmail.com 2006-08-18 19:10 MST ------- Rsync already has a slow-down.diff that does something similar. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.samba.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
samba-bugs@samba.org
2006-Oct-15  18:18 UTC
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 4030] new option: --filelimit
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4030
wayned@samba.org changed:
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
            Version|2.6.8                       |2.6.9
------- Comment #3 from wayned@samba.org  2006-10-15 13:18 MST -------
Yes, it would be nice to be able to get rsync to not saturate the file I/O in
some way.  Perhaps something more like the --slow-down option would be better
than this, but I haven't looked at it enough yet to decide, so I'll
leave this
open for now.
-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.samba.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
samba-bugs@samba.org
2008-Jun-24  00:14 UTC
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 4030] new option: --filelimit
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4030
matt@mattmccutchen.net changed:
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |DUPLICATE
------- Comment #4 from matt@mattmccutchen.net  2008-06-23 19:14 CST -------
This is really asking for the same thing as bug 3491.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 3491 ***
-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.samba.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
Possibly Parallel Threads
- DO NOT REPLY [Bug 3491] New: throttle disk IO during filelist/directory parsing
- DO NOT REPLY [Bug 3829] New: rsync loses access ACLs on transferred files
- DO NOT REPLY [Bug 3945] New: add arbitrary error reporting (with --error, perhaps)
- DO NOT REPLY [Bug 3465] New: --files-from does not --delete
- DO NOT REPLY [Bug 6915] New: Reject passing an argument to an option that doesn't take one