Helvaci, Ayse N. (Contractor)
2006-Jan-23 20:08 UTC
[Bug 1675] New: rsync cannot cope with literal IPv6 addresses
Dear Sir or Madam, Currently, we are using Rsync 2.6.6. I wonder if this version is compatible with IPv6? I would really appreciate your feedback. Sincerely, Nurten Helvaci -------------- next part -------------- HTML attachment scrubbed and removed
On Mon, Jan 23, 2006 at 03:07:47PM -0500, Helvaci, Ayse N. (Contractor) wrote:> Currently, we are using Rsync 2.6.6. I wonder if this version is > compatible with IPv6?Rsync has had IPv6 support for 4 years now. Bug 1675 was requesting the ability to specify a literal IPv6 addresses on the command-line (e.g. '[::1]:path/file.txt'), which was added in rsync version 2.6.4. ..wayne..
Maybe Matching Threads
- DO NOT REPLY [Bug 1675] rsync cannot cope with literal IPv6 addresses
- DO NOT REPLY [Bug 4016] New: literal IPv6 addresses not supported in ssh protocol
- DO NOT REPLY [Bug 6067] New: IPv6 literal addresses broken
- IPv6 literal addresses on command line
- 2.0beta3 10876:370ee9717a6c broke listen on literal IPv6 address