rspec users - Dec 2010 - nested examples in html formatter

Is there a way for the html formatter to show nested "describe"
blocks, as written in my examples.
Or perhaps I should change how I write my examples so nesting can be shown?

eg

describe MyModel do
	it "should be valid"

	describe "something" do
		it "should do this correctly" 
		it "should fail gracefully"
		it "should do this without that"
	end

	describe "something else" do
		it "should go on and on"
	end
end

On Dec 13, 2010, at 10:46 PM, Jonathan Linowes wrote:
> Is there a way for the html formatter to show nested "describe"
blocks, as written in my examples.
Not supported yet. Patches welcome!
> Or perhaps I should change how I write my examples so nesting can be shown?
> 
> eg
> 
> describe MyModel do
> 	it "should be valid"
> 
> 	describe "something" do
> 		it "should do this correctly" 
> 		it "should fail gracefully"
> 		it "should do this without that"
> 	end
> 
> 	describe "something else" do
> 		it "should go on and on"
> 	end
> end
> 
> _______________________________________________
> rspec-users mailing list
> rspec-users at rubyforge.org
> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
Cheers,
David

Just FYI, it is now:
https://github.com/rspec/rspec-core/commit/edb7f851a85ffe318a5d9d161c896bde448b61e1

Jarmo Pertman
-----
IT does really matter - http://www.itreallymatters.net


On Dec 14, 3:25?pm, David Chelimsky <dchelim... at gmail.com>
wrote:
> On Dec 13, 2010, at 10:46 PM, Jonathan Linowes wrote:
>
> > Is there a way for the html formatter to show nested
"describe" blocks, as written in my examples.
>
> Not supported yet. Patches welcome!
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > Or perhaps I should change how I write my examples so nesting can be
shown?
>
> > eg
>
> > describe MyModel do
> > ? ?it "should be valid"
>
> > ? ?describe "something" do
> > ? ? ? ? ? ?it "should do this correctly"
> > ? ? ? ? ? ?it "should fail gracefully"
> > ? ? ? ? ? ?it "should do this without that"
> > ? ?end
>
> > ? ?describe "something else" do
> > ? ? ? ? ? ?it "should go on and on"
> > ? ?end
> > end
>
> > _______________________________________________
> > rspec-users mailing list
> > rspec-us... at rubyforge.org
> >http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
>
> Cheers,
> David
>
> _______________________________________________
> rspec-users mailing list
> rspec-us... at
rubyforge.orghttp://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users