rspec users - Jun 2010 - Rails 3 + RSpec-Rails 2.0 generators (different question)

I just tried ''rails g rspec:model SomeModel'' and all I get
back are
the specs. I checked the generator file and it does seem that only the
specs are being generated.

Is the behavior we should expect from the rspec-rails generators? I
would have thought it would generate the model file and the migrations
as well. Should I be running the rails model generator as well? Would
it make sense for the rspec-rails generator to call the rails
generator?

A quick check at the controller generator shows it is similar.

- Brian

Nevermind, I see that the rspec generators will hook into the rails
ones. So if I call ''rails g model SomeModel'' it will call the
rspec:model generator. Pretty sweet!

- Brian

On Jun 3, 1:00?pm, Brian Cardarella <bcardare... at gmail.com>
wrote:
> I just tried ''rails g rspec:model SomeModel'' and all I
get back are
> the specs. I checked the generator file and it does seem that only the
> specs are being generated.
>
> Is the behavior we should expect from the rspec-rails generators? I
> would have thought it would generate the model file and the migrations
> as well. Should I be running the rails model generator as well? Would
> it make sense for the rspec-rails generator to call the rails
> generator?
>
> A quick check at the controller generator shows it is similar.
>
> - Brian
> _______________________________________________
> rspec-users mailing list
> rspec-us... at
rubyforge.orghttp://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users