rspec users - Mar 2009 - [Cucumber] Rails Upgrade Notes

In the history.txt for 0.2 is an "important note" toward the bottom of
the announcement.
(http://github.com/aslakhellesoy/cucumber/blob/d0555e4ca8a133f020efefd5a755da04bde3f57d/History.txt
). This is really, *really* important for Rails users, but it can be  
more than a bit difficult to Google out.

Questions:

1. Can this be brought into a wiki page on github on cuke.info?
2. Is there a way to tell under what version of Cucumber one is  
running so the require can require either the old files for Cuke < 0.2  
or the ones now?

Thx

On Sat, Mar 21, 2009 at 12:53 PM, s.ross <cwdinfo at gmail.com> wrote:
> In the history.txt for 0.2 is an "important note" toward the
bottom of the
> announcement. (
>
http://github.com/aslakhellesoy/cucumber/blob/d0555e4ca8a133f020efefd5a755da04bde3f57d/History.txt).
> This is really, *really* important for Rails users, but it can be more than
> a bit difficult to Google out.
>
The Important note dates back from 0.1.16.4, which is a couple of months
old.

>
> Questions:
>
> 1. Can this be brought into a wiki page on github on cuke.info?

Sure, feel free to edit the Rails page with relevant info. My general
recommendation is to always rerun script/generate cucumber after you upgrade
your Cucumber gem/plugin. Maybe you could add a note about that?

>
> 2. Is there a way to tell under what version of Cucumber one is running so
> the require can require either the old files for Cuke < 0.2 or the ones
now?
>
cucumber --version

or from code:

Cucumber::VERSION::STRING

Aslak

> Thx
> _______________________________________________
> rspec-users mailing list
> rspec-users at rubyforge.org
> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/rspec-users/attachments/20090321/123ec13d/attachment.html>