rspec users - Feb 2009 - [cucumber] [alpha] The Backgrounder is run without cleaning up

This /could/ just a screwy behavior I''m seeing in SQL lite, but I
don''t
think so; normal scenarios are doing this just fine.

I''m playing with the Background feature in the .1.99 beta, and it looks
like
it''s being run before every feature -- but it''s not cleaning
up afterwards.
I have a model with a validates_uniquness_of in place, and I''m seeing
something that looks like this:

Feature: It should be able to run for multiple files
  Background:
    Given a model with unique name "Foobar"

  Scenario:  This one runs okay
    # ....

  Scenario: But this one fails
    # background is run, and fails to create the model because of the
validation

Is this known, and fixed in github, or have I stumbled on something new?

-- 
// anything worth taking seriously is worth making fun of
// http://blog.devcaffeine.com/
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/rspec-users/attachments/20090210/1a723cf6/attachment.html>

On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 2:10 AM, Chris Flipse <cflipse at gmail.com>
wrote:
> This /could/ just a screwy behavior I''m seeing in SQL lite, but I
don''t
> think so; normal scenarios are doing this just fine.
>
> I''m playing with the Background feature in the .1.99 beta, and it
looks like
> it''s being run before every feature -- but it''s not
cleaning up afterwards.
> I have a model with a validates_uniquness_of in place, and I''m
seeing
> something that looks like this:
>
> Feature: It should be able to run for multiple files
>   Background:
>     Given a model with unique name "Foobar"
>
>   Scenario:  This one runs okay
>     # ....
>
>   Scenario: But this one fails
>     # background is run, and fails to create the model because of the
> validation
>
> Is this known, and fixed in github, or have I stumbled on something new?
>
It''s known:
http://rspec.lighthouseapp.com/projects/16211/tickets/181-background-runs-outside-of-transactions
It''s not fixed yet. Joseph has done some work to address it. I still
have some left to do.

Aslak
> --
> // anything worth taking seriously is worth making fun of
> // http://blog.devcaffeine.com/
>
> _______________________________________________
> rspec-users mailing list
> rspec-users at rubyforge.org
> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
>


-- 
Aslak (::)

Okay, thanks.  Wanted to check before filing a bug so I''m not throwing
duplicates into the mix.

On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 2:56 AM, aslak hellesoy <aslak.hellesoy at
gmail.com>wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 2:10 AM, Chris Flipse <cflipse at gmail.com>
wrote:
> > This /could/ just a screwy behavior I''m seeing in SQL lite,
but I don''t
> > think so; normal scenarios are doing this just fine.
> >
> > I''m playing with the Background feature in the .1.99 beta,
and it looks
> like
> > it''s being run before every feature -- but it''s not
cleaning up
> afterwards.
> > I have a model with a validates_uniquness_of in place, and
I''m seeing
> > something that looks like this:
> >
> > Feature: It should be able to run for multiple files
> >   Background:
> >     Given a model with unique name "Foobar"
> >
> >   Scenario:  This one runs okay
> >     # ....
> >
> >   Scenario: But this one fails
> >     # background is run, and fails to create the model because of the
> > validation
> >
> > Is this known, and fixed in github, or have I stumbled on something
new?
> >
>
> It''s known:
>
http://rspec.lighthouseapp.com/projects/16211/tickets/181-background-runs-outside-of-transactions
> It''s not fixed yet. Joseph has done some work to address it. I
still
> have some left to do.
>
> Aslak
>
> > --
> > // anything worth taking seriously is worth making fun of
> > // http://blog.devcaffeine.com/
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > rspec-users mailing list
> > rspec-users at rubyforge.org
> > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Aslak (::)
> _______________________________________________
> rspec-users mailing list
> rspec-users at rubyforge.org
> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
>


-- 
// anything worth taking seriously is worth making fun of
// http://blog.devcaffeine.com/
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/rspec-users/attachments/20090211/026d3589/attachment-0001.html>