thr3ads.net - rspec users - [rspec-users] Weird message on ActiveSupport::Callbacks::CallbackChain:Class [Feb 2009]

If this information is useful, please help other people find it:
Share via:

Remi Gagnon

2009-Feb-10 14:54 UTC

[rspec-users] Weird message on ActiveSupport::Callbacks::CallbackChain:Class

Hi guys,

its probably a miss understanding of the framework but I need your
assistance.

Here is the problem of one of my teammates:

I have a hard time writing rspecs for a class I developed. The class in
question reads an xml document, instanciates the model classes found in the
xml and saves the classes and their attributes in the database with the good
foreign keys. The class is stored in a lib.



The class :



class XmlReader



 def self.import_xml(xml_doc)

  objects_xml = Array.new

  keys_obj = Array.new

  xml = REXML::Document.new(xml_doc)

  read_xml(xml, objects_xml, keys_obj)

 * *raise AnError.new("Can not save xml objects") *if*
(objects_xml.empty?)

  objects_xml.each { |instance|**

    save_class(instance, keys_obj[objects_xml.index(instance)])

  }

 end



 ?

end



The import_xml function acts as an entry point but there are two other
functions involved in the process :



-          read_xml : reads the xml elements one by one and instanciates the
classes that have to be with the attributes found in the xml document. It is
called recursively. The two arrays,  objects_xml and keys_obj, contain
respectively all the instanciated objects found and all the foreign keys
defined in the relations of the models.



-          save_class : saves the instanciated objects contained in the
objets_xml array with the good foreign keys for the relations to be well
done.



Now, I am trying to test if the objects_xml array is empty. If so, the class
should raise an error.



The rspec :



# mocks ?

*@mock_element* = mock(REXML::Element)* *

*mock_element*.stub!(*:text*)

*@mock_element*.stub!(*:name*)

*@mock_element*.stub!(*:elements*)

*@xml_doc* = mock(REXML::Document,* :elements* => { "e1" =>*
@mock_element*,"e2"=>
* @mock_element* })

*@xml_doc*.stub!(*:new*)

*@xml_doc*.stub!(*:has_elements?*)

*xml_doc*.stub!(*:encoding*)

*@objets_xml* = mock(Array)

*@objets_xml*.stub!(*:[]=*)

*@objets_xml*.stub!(*:[]*)**

*objets_xml*.stub!(*:empty?*)

*@keys_obj* = mock(Array)

*@keys_obj*.stub!(*:[]=*)

*@keys_obj*.stub!(*:[]*)



Array.should_receive(*:new*).and_return(*@objets_xml*)

Array.should_receive(*:new*).and_return(*@keys_obj*)

REXML::Document.should_receive(*:new*).and_return(*@xml_doc*)

XmlReader.should_receive(*:read_xml*).and_return(*true*)**

*objets_xml*.should_receive(*:empty?*).and_return(*true*)

doing { XmlReader.import_xml(xml_valid) }.should raise_error(AnError, "Can
not save xml objects")



The error :



undefined method `new'' for
ActiveSupport::Callbacks::CallbackChain:Class



This is where my problem is. This error occurs after the test is made
and finished. In other words, the test passes but the framework fails
after it on a callback made in rails for whatever reason.



Stack trace :



C:/Projets/Iter8_Conversion/vendor/rails/actionpack/lib/action_controller/test_process.rb:471:in
`method_missing''

C:/ruby/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/rspec-1.1.12/lib/spec/mocks/proxy.rb:102:in
`__send__''

C:/ruby/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/rspec-1.1.12/lib/spec/mocks/proxy.rb:102:in
`message_received''

C:/ruby/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/rspec-1.1.12/lib/spec/mocks/proxy.rb:140:in
`new''

(eval):7:in `teardown_callback_chain''

C:/Projets/Iter8_Conversion/vendor/rails/activesupport/lib/active_support/callbacks.rb:277:in
`send''

C:/Projets/Iter8_Conversion/vendor/rails/activesupport/lib/active_support/callbacks.rb:277:in
`run_callbacks''

C:/ruby/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/rspec-rails-1.1.12/lib/spec/rails/interop/testcase.rb:10

C:/ruby/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/rspec-1.1.12/lib/spec/example/example_methods.rb:84:in
`instance_eval''

C:/ruby/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/rspec-1.1.12/lib/spec/example/example_methods.rb:84:in
`eval_each_fail_slow''

C:/ruby/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/rspec-1.1.12/lib/spec/example/example_methods.rb:82:in
`each''

C:/ruby/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/rspec-1.1.12/lib/spec/example/example_methods.rb:82:in
`eval_each_fail_slow''

C:/ruby/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/rspec-1.1.12/lib/spec/example/example_group_methods.rb:254:in
`run_after_each''

C:/ruby/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/rspec-1.1.12/lib/spec/example/example_group_methods.rb:253:in
`each''

C:/ruby/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/rspec-1.1.12/lib/spec/example/example_group_methods.rb:253:in
`run_after_each''

C:/ruby/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/rspec-1.1.12/lib/spec/example/example_methods.rb:141:in
`after_each_example''

C:/ruby/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/rspec-1.1.12/lib/spec/example/example_methods.rb:57:in
`execute''

C:/ruby/lib/ruby/1.8/timeout.rb:56:in `timeout''

C:/ruby/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/rspec-1.1.12/lib/spec/example/example_methods.rb:49:in
`execute''

C:/ruby/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/rspec-1.1.12/lib/spec/example/example_group_methods.rb:284:in
`execute_examples''

C:/ruby/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/rspec-1.1.12/lib/spec/example/example_group_methods.rb:283:in
`each''

C:/ruby/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/rspec-1.1.12/lib/spec/example/example_group_methods.rb:283:in
`execute_examples''

C:/ruby/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/rspec-1.1.12/lib/spec/example/example_group_methods.rb:171:in
`run''

C:/ruby/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/rspec-1.1.12/lib/spec/runner/example_group_runner.rb:23:in
`run''

C:/ruby/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/rspec-1.1.12/lib/spec/runner/example_group_runner.rb:22:in
`each''

C:/ruby/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/rspec-1.1.12/lib/spec/runner/example_group_runner.rb:22:in
`run''

C:/ruby/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/rspec-1.1.12/lib/spec/runner/options.rb:111:in
`run_examples''

C:/ruby/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/rspec-1.1.12/lib/spec/runner/command_line.rb:9:in
`run''

C:/ruby/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/rspec-1.1.12/bin/spec:4

C:/ruby/bin/spec:19:in `load''

C:/ruby/bin/spec:19



Can anyone explain what is happening here or does anyone knows how to bypass
this ?



Many thanks in advance.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/rspec-users/attachments/20090210/9d48cf09/attachment-0001.html>

Remi Gagnon

2009-Feb-10 15:03 UTC

head link

[rspec-users] Weird message on ActiveSupport::Callbacks::CallbackChain:Class

Hi guys,

its probably a miss understanding of the framework but I need your
assistance.

Here is the problem of one of my teammates:
I have a hard time writing rspecs for a class I developed. The class in
question reads an xml document, instanciates the model classes found in the
xml and saves the classes and their attributes in the database with the good
foreign keys. The class is stored in a lib.

The class :

class XmlReader

 def self.import_xml(xml_doc)
  objects_xml = Array.new
  keys_obj = Array.new
  xml = REXML::Document.new(xml_doc)
  read_xml(xml, objects_xml, keys_obj)
  raise AnError.new("Can not save xml objects") if
(objects_xml.empty?)
  objects_xml.each { |instance|
    save_class(instance, keys_obj[objects_xml.index(instance)])
  }
 end
 ?
end

The import_xml function acts as an entry point but there are two other
functions involved in the process :
-          read_xml : reads the xml elements one by one and instanciates the
classes that have to be with the attributes found in the xml document. It is
called recursively. The two arrays,  objects_xml and keys_obj, contain
respectively all the instanciated objects found and all the foreign keys
defined in the relations of the models.
-          save_class : saves the instanciated objects contained in the
objets_xml array with the good foreign keys for the relations to be well
done.

Now, I am trying to test if the objects_xml array is empty. If so, the class
should raise an error.

The rspec :

# mocks ?
@mock_element = mock(REXML::Element)
mock_element.stub!(:text)
@mock_element.stub!(:name)
@mock_element.stub!(:elements)
@xml_doc = mock(REXML::Document, :elements => { "e1" =>
@mock_element, "e2"
=> @mock_element })
@xml_doc.stub!(:new)
@xml_doc.stub!(:has_elements?)
xml_doc.stub!(:encoding)
@objets_xml = mock(Array)
@objets_xml.stub!(:[]=)
@objets_xml.stub!(:[])
objets_xml.stub!(:empty?)
@keys_obj = mock(Array)
@keys_obj.stub!(:[]=)
@keys_obj.stub!(:[])

Array.should_receive(:new).and_return(@objets_xml)
Array.should_receive(:new).and_return(@keys_obj)
REXML::Document.should_receive(:new).and_return(@xml_doc)
XmlReader.should_receive(:read_xml).and_return(true)
objets_xml.should_receive(:empty?).and_return(true)
lambda { XmlReader.import_xml(xml_valid) }.should raise_error(AnError, "Can
not save xml objects")

The error :

undefined method `new'' for
ActiveSupport::Callbacks::CallbackChain:Class

This is where my problem is. This error occurs after the test is made and
finished. In other words, the test passes but the framework fails after it
on a callback made in rails for whatever reason.

Stack trace :

C:/Projets/Iter8_Conversion/vendor/rails/actionpack/lib/action_controller/test_process.rb:471:in
`method_missing''
C:/ruby/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/rspec-1.1.12/lib/spec/mocks/proxy.rb:102:in
`__send__''
C:/ruby/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/rspec-1.1.12/lib/spec/mocks/proxy.rb:102:in
`message_received''
C:/ruby/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/rspec-1.1.12/lib/spec/mocks/proxy.rb:140:in
`new''
(eval):7:in `teardown_callback_chain''
C:/Projets/Iter8_Conversion/vendor/rails/activesupport/lib/active_support/callbacks.rb:277:in
`send''
C:/Projets/Iter8_Conversion/vendor/rails/activesupport/lib/active_support/callbacks.rb:277:in
`run_callbacks''
C:/ruby/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/rspec-rails-1.1.12/lib/spec/rails/interop/testcase.rb:10
C:/ruby/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/rspec-1.1.12/lib/spec/example/example_methods.rb:84:in
`instance_eval''
C:/ruby/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/rspec-1.1.12/lib/spec/example/example_methods.rb:84:in
`eval_each_fail_slow''
C:/ruby/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/rspec-1.1.12/lib/spec/example/example_methods.rb:82:in
`each''
C:/ruby/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/rspec-1.1.12/lib/spec/example/example_methods.rb:82:in
`eval_each_fail_slow''
C:/ruby/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/rspec-1.1.12/lib/spec/example/example_group_methods.rb:254:in
`run_after_each''
C:/ruby/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/rspec-1.1.12/lib/spec/example/example_group_methods.rb:253:in
`each''
C:/ruby/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/rspec-1.1.12/lib/spec/example/example_group_methods.rb:253:in
`run_after_each''
C:/ruby/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/rspec-1.1.12/lib/spec/example/example_methods.rb:141:in
`after_each_example''

Can anyone explain what is happening here or does anyone knows how to bypass
this ?

Many thanks in advance.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/rspec-users/attachments/20090210/0d852e86/attachment.html>

David Chelimsky

2009-Feb-11 05:05 UTC

head link

[rspec-users] Weird message on ActiveSupport::Callbacks::CallbackChain:Class

On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 9:03 AM, Remi Gagnon <rem.gagnon at gmail.com>
wrote:> Hi guys,
>
> its probably a miss understanding of the framework but I need your
> assistance.
>
> Here is the problem of one of my teammates:
> I have a hard time writing rspecs for a class I developed. The class in
> question reads an xml document, instanciates the model classes found in the
> xml and saves the classes and their attributes in the database with the
good
> foreign keys. The class is stored in a lib.
>
> The class :
>
> class XmlReader
>
>  def self.import_xml(xml_doc)
>   objects_xml = Array.new
>   keys_obj = Array.new
>   xml = REXML::Document.new(xml_doc)
>   read_xml(xml, objects_xml, keys_obj)
>   raise AnError.new("Can not save xml objects") if
(objects_xml.empty?)
>   objects_xml.each { |instance|
>     save_class(instance, keys_obj[objects_xml.index(instance)])
>   }
>  end
>  ?
> end
>
> The import_xml function acts as an entry point but there are two other
> functions involved in the process :
> -          read_xml : reads the xml elements one by one and instanciates
the
> classes that have to be with the attributes found in the xml document. It
is
> called recursively. The two arrays,  objects_xml and keys_obj, contain
> respectively all the instanciated objects found and all the foreign keys
> defined in the relations of the models.
> -          save_class : saves the instanciated objects contained in the
> objets_xml array with the good foreign keys for the relations to be well
> done.
>
> Now, I am trying to test if the objects_xml array is empty. If so, the
class
> should raise an error.
>
> The rspec :
>
> # mocks ?
> @mock_element = mock(REXML::Element)
> mock_element.stub!(:text)
> @mock_element.stub!(:name)
> @mock_element.stub!(:elements)
> @xml_doc = mock(REXML::Document, :elements => { "e1" =>
@mock_element, "e2"
> => @mock_element })
> @xml_doc.stub!(:new)
> @xml_doc.stub!(:has_elements?)
> xml_doc.stub!(:encoding)
> @objets_xml = mock(Array)
> @objets_xml.stub!(:[]=)
> @objets_xml.stub!(:[])
> objets_xml.stub!(:empty?)
> @keys_obj = mock(Array)
> @keys_obj.stub!(:[]=)
> @keys_obj.stub!(:[])
>
> Array.should_receive(:new).and_return(@objets_xml)
> Array.should_receive(:new).and_return(@keys_obj)
> REXML::Document.should_receive(:new).and_return(@xml_doc)
> XmlReader.should_receive(:read_xml).and_return(true)
> objets_xml.should_receive(:empty?).and_return(true)
> lambda { XmlReader.import_xml(xml_valid) }.should raise_error(AnError,
"Can
> not save xml objects")
This is one of those "Doctor, it hurts when I do this" sorta
situations. The whole point of TDD, and BDD, is to write code examples
first so that you end up with code that is inherently testable.
Back-filling specs on legacy code (code without tests!) is painful,
and you are suffering that pain here.

That said, what I''d do here is take a cue from Michael
Feather''s
Working Effectively with Legacy Code. Start with a high level
characterization test in which you pass the appropriately structured
xml doc and specify the expected outcomes. Don''t worry about granular
specs about which step in the procedure is doing what at first. Once
you have a few of those in place, start to refactor those bits out to
other methods that you can spec directly.

I realize that this doesn''t solve your specific problem directly, but
I really have no clue from where I''m sitting as to where
ActiveSupport::Callbacks::CallbackChain:Class is injecting itself into
this process.

HTH,
David

>
> The error :
>
> undefined method `new'' for
ActiveSupport::Callbacks::CallbackChain:Class
>
> This is where my problem is. This error occurs after the test is made and
> finished. In other words, the test passes but the framework fails after it
> on a callback made in rails for whatever reason.
>
> Stack trace :
>
>
C:/Projets/Iter8_Conversion/vendor/rails/actionpack/lib/action_controller/test_process.rb:471:in
> `method_missing''
> C:/ruby/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/rspec-1.1.12/lib/spec/mocks/proxy.rb:102:in
> `__send__''
> C:/ruby/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/rspec-1.1.12/lib/spec/mocks/proxy.rb:102:in
> `message_received''
> C:/ruby/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/rspec-1.1.12/lib/spec/mocks/proxy.rb:140:in
> `new''
> (eval):7:in `teardown_callback_chain''
>
C:/Projets/Iter8_Conversion/vendor/rails/activesupport/lib/active_support/callbacks.rb:277:in
> `send''
>
C:/Projets/Iter8_Conversion/vendor/rails/activesupport/lib/active_support/callbacks.rb:277:in
> `run_callbacks''
>
C:/ruby/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/rspec-rails-1.1.12/lib/spec/rails/interop/testcase.rb:10
>
C:/ruby/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/rspec-1.1.12/lib/spec/example/example_methods.rb:84:in
> `instance_eval''
>
C:/ruby/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/rspec-1.1.12/lib/spec/example/example_methods.rb:84:in
> `eval_each_fail_slow''
>
C:/ruby/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/rspec-1.1.12/lib/spec/example/example_methods.rb:82:in
> `each''
>
C:/ruby/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/rspec-1.1.12/lib/spec/example/example_methods.rb:82:in
> `eval_each_fail_slow''
>
C:/ruby/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/rspec-1.1.12/lib/spec/example/example_group_methods.rb:254:in
> `run_after_each''
>
C:/ruby/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/rspec-1.1.12/lib/spec/example/example_group_methods.rb:253:in
> `each''
>
C:/ruby/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/rspec-1.1.12/lib/spec/example/example_group_methods.rb:253:in
> `run_after_each''
>
C:/ruby/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/rspec-1.1.12/lib/spec/example/example_methods.rb:141:in
> `after_each_example''
>
> Can anyone explain what is happening here or does anyone knows how to
bypass
> this ?
>
> Many thanks in advance.
>
> _______________________________________________
> rspec-users mailing list
> rspec-users at rubyforge.org
> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
>

Remi Gagnon

2009-Feb-12 01:45 UTC

head link

[rspec-users] Weird message on ActiveSupport::Callbacks::CallbackChain:Class

Thank you David,

You are right we are dealing with some code that need to be refactored.

We will dig deeper to have more info about this Callbackchain problem

R?mi

On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 12:05 AM, David Chelimsky <dchelimsky at
gmail.com>wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 9:03 AM, Remi Gagnon <rem.gagnon at
gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hi guys,
> >
> > its probably a miss understanding of the framework but I need your
> > assistance.
> >
> > Here is the problem of one of my teammates:
> > I have a hard time writing rspecs for a class I developed. The class
in
> > question reads an xml document, instanciates the model classes found
in
> the
> > xml and saves the classes and their attributes in the database with
the
> good
> > foreign keys. The class is stored in a lib.
> >
> > The class :
> >
> > class XmlReader
> >
> >  def self.import_xml(xml_doc)
> >   objects_xml = Array.new
> >   keys_obj = Array.new
> >   xml = REXML::Document.new(xml_doc)
> >   read_xml(xml, objects_xml, keys_obj)
> >   raise AnError.new("Can not save xml objects") if
(objects_xml.empty?)
> >   objects_xml.each { |instance|
> >     save_class(instance, keys_obj[objects_xml.index(instance)])
> >   }
> >  end
> >  ?
> > end
> >
> > The import_xml function acts as an entry point but there are two other
> > functions involved in the process :
> > -          read_xml : reads the xml elements one by one and
instanciates
> the
> > classes that have to be with the attributes found in the xml document.
It
> is
> > called recursively. The two arrays,  objects_xml and keys_obj, contain
> > respectively all the instanciated objects found and all the foreign
keys
> > defined in the relations of the models.
> > -          save_class : saves the instanciated objects contained in
the
> > objets_xml array with the good foreign keys for the relations to be
well
> > done.
> >
> > Now, I am trying to test if the objects_xml array is empty. If so, the
> class
> > should raise an error.
> >
> > The rspec :
> >
> > # mocks ?
> > @mock_element = mock(REXML::Element)
> > mock_element.stub!(:text)
> > @mock_element.stub!(:name)
> > @mock_element.stub!(:elements)
> > @xml_doc = mock(REXML::Document, :elements => { "e1"
=> @mock_element,
> "e2"
> > => @mock_element })
> > @xml_doc.stub!(:new)
> > @xml_doc.stub!(:has_elements?)
> > xml_doc.stub!(:encoding)
> > @objets_xml = mock(Array)
> > @objets_xml.stub!(:[]=)
> > @objets_xml.stub!(:[])
> > objets_xml.stub!(:empty?)
> > @keys_obj = mock(Array)
> > @keys_obj.stub!(:[]=)
> > @keys_obj.stub!(:[])
> >
> > Array.should_receive(:new).and_return(@objets_xml)
> > Array.should_receive(:new).and_return(@keys_obj)
> > REXML::Document.should_receive(:new).and_return(@xml_doc)
> > XmlReader.should_receive(:read_xml).and_return(true)
> > objets_xml.should_receive(:empty?).and_return(true)
> > lambda { XmlReader.import_xml(xml_valid) }.should raise_error(AnError,
> "Can
> > not save xml objects")
>
> This is one of those "Doctor, it hurts when I do this" sorta
> situations. The whole point of TDD, and BDD, is to write code examples
> first so that you end up with code that is inherently testable.
> Back-filling specs on legacy code (code without tests!) is painful,
> and you are suffering that pain here.
>
> That said, what I''d do here is take a cue from Michael
Feather''s
> Working Effectively with Legacy Code. Start with a high level
> characterization test in which you pass the appropriately structured
> xml doc and specify the expected outcomes. Don''t worry about
granular
> specs about which step in the procedure is doing what at first. Once
> you have a few of those in place, start to refactor those bits out to
> other methods that you can spec directly.
>
> I realize that this doesn''t solve your specific problem directly,
but
> I really have no clue from where I''m sitting as to where
> ActiveSupport::Callbacks::CallbackChain:Class is injecting itself into
> this process.
>
> HTH,
> David
>
>
> >
> > The error :
> >
> > undefined method `new'' for
ActiveSupport::Callbacks::CallbackChain:Class
> >
> > This is where my problem is. This error occurs after the test is made
and
> > finished. In other words, the test passes but the framework fails
after
> it
> > on a callback made in rails for whatever reason.
> >
> > Stack trace :
> >
> >
>
C:/Projets/Iter8_Conversion/vendor/rails/actionpack/lib/action_controller/test_process.rb:471:in
> > `method_missing''
> >
> C:/ruby/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/rspec-1.1.12/lib/spec/mocks/proxy.rb:102:in
> > `__send__''
> >
> C:/ruby/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/rspec-1.1.12/lib/spec/mocks/proxy.rb:102:in
> > `message_received''
> >
> C:/ruby/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/rspec-1.1.12/lib/spec/mocks/proxy.rb:140:in
> > `new''
> > (eval):7:in `teardown_callback_chain''
> >
>
C:/Projets/Iter8_Conversion/vendor/rails/activesupport/lib/active_support/callbacks.rb:277:in
> > `send''
> >
>
C:/Projets/Iter8_Conversion/vendor/rails/activesupport/lib/active_support/callbacks.rb:277:in
> > `run_callbacks''
> >
>
C:/ruby/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/rspec-rails-1.1.12/lib/spec/rails/interop/testcase.rb:10
> >
>
C:/ruby/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/rspec-1.1.12/lib/spec/example/example_methods.rb:84:in
> > `instance_eval''
> >
>
C:/ruby/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/rspec-1.1.12/lib/spec/example/example_methods.rb:84:in
> > `eval_each_fail_slow''
> >
>
C:/ruby/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/rspec-1.1.12/lib/spec/example/example_methods.rb:82:in
> > `each''
> >
>
C:/ruby/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/rspec-1.1.12/lib/spec/example/example_methods.rb:82:in
> > `eval_each_fail_slow''
> >
>
C:/ruby/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/rspec-1.1.12/lib/spec/example/example_group_methods.rb:254:in
> > `run_after_each''
> >
>
C:/ruby/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/rspec-1.1.12/lib/spec/example/example_group_methods.rb:253:in
> > `each''
> >
>
C:/ruby/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/rspec-1.1.12/lib/spec/example/example_group_methods.rb:253:in
> > `run_after_each''
> >
>
C:/ruby/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/rspec-1.1.12/lib/spec/example/example_methods.rb:141:in
> > `after_each_example''
> >
> > Can anyone explain what is happening here or does anyone knows how to
> bypass
> > this ?
> >
> > Many thanks in advance.
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > rspec-users mailing list
> > rspec-users at rubyforge.org
> > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
> >
> _______________________________________________
> rspec-users mailing list
> rspec-users at rubyforge.org
> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
>-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/rspec-users/attachments/20090211/d6957345/attachment.html>

rspec users - Feb 2009 - Weird message on ActiveSupport::Callbacks::CallbackChain:Class

[rspec-users] Weird message on ActiveSupport::Callbacks::CallbackChain:Class

[rspec-users] Weird message on ActiveSupport::Callbacks::CallbackChain:Class

[rspec-users] Weird message on ActiveSupport::Callbacks::CallbackChain:Class

[rspec-users] Weird message on ActiveSupport::Callbacks::CallbackChain:Class