If this is a bug I''ll submit a ticket. Or, maybe I''d doing something wrong. Using a Cucumber FIT Step Table, the scenario runs and passes (and fails when i put bad data in the table). But the console output only shows the Step text, not the table so when I read the output it''s not telling me what data was actually run. Cucumber 0.1.13.2 tia, linoj
I think this is not yet implemented. I had the same issue and was told they are working on it but that they are doing a big refactoring so might not be in 0.1.13 yet To work around that issues. I created a helper method that can print the table in one line or multiple line. Then call the method with the element of the table twice. One for the table and one to show them in the step. Then I made sure all the step regular expresion supported that notation Thanks Emmanuel On Dec 28, 2008, at 10:09 AM, Jonathan Linowes wrote:> If this is a bug I''ll submit a ticket. > Or, maybe I''d doing something wrong. > > Using a Cucumber FIT Step Table, the scenario runs and passes (and > fails when i put bad data in the table). But the console output only > shows the Step text, not the table so when I read the output it''s > not telling me what data was actually run. > > Cucumber 0.1.13.2 > > tia, > linoj > > _______________________________________________ > rspec-users mailing list > rspec-users at rubyforge.org > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
could you pastie an example? On Dec 28, 2008, at 1:19 PM, Emmanuel Pinault wrote:> I think this is not yet implemented. I had the same issue and was > told they are working on it but that they are doing a big > refactoring so might not be in 0.1.13 yet > > To work around that issues. I created a helper method that can > print the table in one line or multiple line. Then call the method > with the element of the table twice. One for the table and one to > show them in the step. Then I made sure all the step regular > expresion supported that notation > > Thanks > > Emmanuel > On Dec 28, 2008, at 10:09 AM, Jonathan Linowes wrote: > >> If this is a bug I''ll submit a ticket. >> Or, maybe I''d doing something wrong. >> >> Using a Cucumber FIT Step Table, the scenario runs and passes (and >> fails when i put bad data in the table). But the console output >> only shows the Step text, not the table so when I read the output >> it''s not telling me what data was actually run. >> >> Cucumber 0.1.13.2 >> >> tia, >> linoj >> >> _______________________________________________ >> rspec-users mailing list >> rspec-users at rubyforge.org >> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users > > _______________________________________________ > rspec-users mailing list > rspec-users at rubyforge.org > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
something like
Given I do something with the following param |Key1|value1|, |Key2|
Value2|
|Key1|value1|
|Key2|Value2|
Then your step could look like
Given ''I do something with the following .*'' do | table|
// your logic
end
Emmanuel
On Dec 28, 2008, at 10:40 AM, Jonathan Linowes wrote:
> could you pastie an example?
>
> On Dec 28, 2008, at 1:19 PM, Emmanuel Pinault wrote:
>
>> I think this is not yet implemented. I had the same issue and was
>> told they are working on it but that they are doing a big
>> refactoring so might not be in 0.1.13 yet
>>
>> To work around that issues. I created a helper method that can
>> print the table in one line or multiple line. Then call the method
>> with the element of the table twice. One for the table and one to
>> show them in the step. Then I made sure all the step regular
>> expresion supported that notation
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> Emmanuel
>> On Dec 28, 2008, at 10:09 AM, Jonathan Linowes wrote:
>>
>>> If this is a bug I''ll submit a ticket.
>>> Or, maybe I''d doing something wrong.
>>>
>>> Using a Cucumber FIT Step Table, the scenario runs and passes (and
>>> fails when i put bad data in the table). But the console output
>>> only shows the Step text, not the table so when I read the output
>>> it''s not telling me what data was actually run.
>>>
>>> Cucumber 0.1.13.2
>>>
>>> tia,
>>> linoj
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> rspec-users mailing list
>>> rspec-users at rubyforge.org
>>> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> rspec-users mailing list
>> rspec-users at rubyforge.org
>> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
>
> _______________________________________________
> rspec-users mailing list
> rspec-users at rubyforge.org
> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
On Sun, Dec 28, 2008 at 7:19 PM, Emmanuel Pinault <seatmanu at gmail.com>wrote:> I think this is not yet implemented. I had the same issue and was told they > are working on it but that they are doing a big refactoring so might not be > in 0.1.13 yet >That''s right. You have to wait for the next major release to have tables printed.> > To work around that issues. I created a helper method that can print the > table in one line or multiple line. Then call the method with the element of > the table twice. One for the table and one to show them in the step. Then I > made sure all the step regular expresion supported that notation > > Thanks > > Emmanuel > > On Dec 28, 2008, at 10:09 AM, Jonathan Linowes wrote: > > If this is a bug I''ll submit a ticket. >> Or, maybe I''d doing something wrong. >> >> Using a Cucumber FIT Step Table, > >Let''s stop calling tables "FIT tables". Tables are *inspired* from the FIT tool, but they *are not* FIT tables. Better names: Step tables and Scenario tables. Step tables are tables that are arguments to step definitions. Scenario tables are tables that invoke a Scenario (or Scenario Outline) with special values. Aslak the scenario runs and passes (and fails when i put bad data in the table).>> But the console output only shows the Step text, not the table so when I >> read the output it''s not telling me what data was actually run. >> >> Cucumber 0.1.13.2 >> >> tia, >> linoj >> >> _______________________________________________ >> rspec-users mailing list >> rspec-users at rubyforge.org >> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users >> > > _______________________________________________ > rspec-users mailing list > rspec-users at rubyforge.org > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users >-------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/rspec-users/attachments/20081229/de56eed2/attachment.html>