Andreas Wolff
2008-Nov-21 10:55 UTC
[rspec-users] Backtrace for passing specs via custom formatter
Hi, I''m using example.implementation_backtrace in a custom formatter to get the path of the file a passing spec belongs to. Following rspec on github I saw that implementation_backtrace is now deprecated and replaced by example.backtrace. Sadly it always returns nil for passed specs. So I had a look at the source and found that backtrace only gets assigned if line_number was set. Can anybody tell me why this was changed to only work with line_number set and if there is another way to get the file a spec belongs to. Thanks for your help! lg // andreas
David Chelimsky
2008-Nov-22 20:58 UTC
[rspec-users] Backtrace for passing specs via custom formatter
On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 4:55 AM, Andreas Wolff <rubyphunk at googlemail.com> wrote:> Hi, > > I''m using example.implementation_backtrace in a custom formatter to > get the path of the file a passing spec belongs to. Following rspec on > github I saw that implementation_backtrace is now deprecated and > replaced by example.backtrace. Sadly it always returns nil for passed > specs. So I had a look at the source and found that backtrace only > gets assigned if line_number was set. > > Can anybody tell me why this was changed to only work with line_number > set and if there is another way to get the file a spec belongs to.Hey Andreas, I asked for that in the context of another refactoring in the interest of efficiency. I though that it was only being used for --line. I''ve just pushed code back up that removes this errant optimization so you should be good - however, you should use #backtrace instead of #implementation_backtrace. Good? David> > > Thanks for your help! > > > lg // andreas > _______________________________________________ > rspec-users mailing list > rspec-users at rubyforge.org > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users >