Thanks to some very quick feedback on the 1.1.7 release, the RSpec Development Team is proud to announce yet another bug fix release: RSpec-1.1.8. RSpec-1.1.8 includes the following changes: == rspec-1.1.8 * 2 bug fixes * restore colorized output in linux and windows w/ autotest (Tim Pope). Fixes #413. * autospec no longer hangs on windows. Fixes #554. == rspec-rails-1.1.8 * 2 bug fixes * correctly handle assigns that are false. Fixes #552. * ensure that NotYetImplemented examples report as pending (fixed in rspec, not rspec-rails). Fixes #553. == Install [sudo] gem install rspec [sudo] gem install rspec-rails == More information http://rspec.info http://rubyforge.org/projects/rspec/ http://github.com/dchelimsky/rspec/wikis http://rspec.lighthouseapp.com/
David, Can you tag this in git or push your git tags if you have done so locally ? Thanks, Zach On Fri, Oct 3, 2008 at 9:14 AM, David Chelimsky <dchelimsky at gmail.com> wrote:> Thanks to some very quick feedback on the 1.1.7 release, the RSpec > Development Team is proud to announce yet another bug fix release: > RSpec-1.1.8. > > RSpec-1.1.8 includes the following changes: > > == rspec-1.1.8 > > * 2 bug fixes > > * restore colorized output in linux and windows w/ autotest (Tim > Pope). Fixes #413. > * autospec no longer hangs on windows. Fixes #554. > > == rspec-rails-1.1.8 > > * 2 bug fixes > > * correctly handle assigns that are false. Fixes #552. > * ensure that NotYetImplemented examples report as pending (fixed in > rspec, not rspec-rails). Fixes #553. > > == Install > > [sudo] gem install rspec > [sudo] gem install rspec-rails > > == More information > > http://rspec.info > http://rubyforge.org/projects/rspec/ > http://github.com/dchelimsky/rspec/wikis > http://rspec.lighthouseapp.com/ > _______________________________________________ > rspec-users mailing list > rspec-users at rubyforge.org > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users >-- Zach Dennis http://www.continuousthinking.com http://www.mutuallyhuman.com
On Fri, Oct 3, 2008 at 12:28 PM, Zach Dennis <zach.dennis at gmail.com> wrote:> David, > > Can you tag this in git or push your git tags if you have done so > locally ? Thanks,The tags have already been pushed - I can see them on github, can you not?> > Zach > > On Fri, Oct 3, 2008 at 9:14 AM, David Chelimsky <dchelimsky at gmail.com> wrote: >> Thanks to some very quick feedback on the 1.1.7 release, the RSpec >> Development Team is proud to announce yet another bug fix release: >> RSpec-1.1.8. >> >> RSpec-1.1.8 includes the following changes: >> >> == rspec-1.1.8 >> >> * 2 bug fixes >> >> * restore colorized output in linux and windows w/ autotest (Tim >> Pope). Fixes #413. >> * autospec no longer hangs on windows. Fixes #554. >> >> == rspec-rails-1.1.8 >> >> * 2 bug fixes >> >> * correctly handle assigns that are false. Fixes #552. >> * ensure that NotYetImplemented examples report as pending (fixed in >> rspec, not rspec-rails). Fixes #553. >> >> == Install >> >> [sudo] gem install rspec >> [sudo] gem install rspec-rails >> >> == More information >> >> http://rspec.info >> http://rubyforge.org/projects/rspec/ >> http://github.com/dchelimsky/rspec/wikis >> http://rspec.lighthouseapp.com/ >> _______________________________________________ >> rspec-users mailing list >> rspec-users at rubyforge.org >> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users >> > > > > -- > Zach Dennis > http://www.continuousthinking.com > http://www.mutuallyhuman.com > _______________________________________________ > rspec-users mailing list > rspec-users at rubyforge.org > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users >
On Fri, Oct 3, 2008 at 2:02 PM, David Chelimsky <dchelimsky at gmail.com> wrote:> On Fri, Oct 3, 2008 at 12:28 PM, Zach Dennis <zach.dennis at gmail.com> wrote: >> David, >> >> Can you tag this in git or push your git tags if you have done so >> locally ? Thanks, > > The tags have already been pushed - I can see them on github, can you not? >I was doing git tag -l from the rspec-dev repository, which shows 1.1.4 and 1.1.5. From within the rspec and rspec-rails repositories I am seeing 1.1.4, 1.1.5, 1.1.6, 1.1.7 and 1.1.8 tags. Does the rspec-dev repository need to be tagged in general? -- Zach Dennis http://www.continuousthinking.com http://www.mutuallyhuman.com
On Fri, Oct 3, 2008 at 1:09 PM, Zach Dennis <zach.dennis at gmail.com> wrote:> On Fri, Oct 3, 2008 at 2:02 PM, David Chelimsky <dchelimsky at gmail.com> wrote: >> On Fri, Oct 3, 2008 at 12:28 PM, Zach Dennis <zach.dennis at gmail.com> wrote: >>> David, >>> >>> Can you tag this in git or push your git tags if you have done so >>> locally ? Thanks, >> >> The tags have already been pushed - I can see them on github, can you not? >> > > I was doing git tag -l from the rspec-dev repository, which shows > 1.1.4 and 1.1.5. From within the rspec and rspec-rails repositories I > am seeing 1.1.4, 1.1.5, 1.1.6, 1.1.7 and 1.1.8 tags. Does the > rspec-dev repository need to be tagged in general?That''s a good question. Right now some of the code examples for rspec-rails still live in the rspec-dev repo (in the example rails app). I''d like to change that anyhow. I''ll it going forward, and if we find a need for it we can figure out dates and do a best guess retroactively. Cheers, David> > -- > Zach Dennis > http://www.continuousthinking.com > http://www.mutuallyhuman.com > _______________________________________________ > rspec-users mailing list > rspec-users at rubyforge.org > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users >