Here''s a snippet:
it "should provide the fund" do
get(:timesheet,{:id=>@fund.id})
assigns[:fund].should == @fund
end
Works fine on my box, fails on my CI server. Here''s the output:
NoMethodError in ''The FundController timesheet should provide the
fund''
You have a nil object when you didn''t expect it!
You might have expected an instance of Array.
The error occurred while evaluating
nil.[]./spec/controllers/fund_controller_spec.rb:19:
./script/spec:4:
The line raising is the "get" line. I don''t see a foo[bar] =
x,
implied anywhere in the statement.
Has anyone seen this?
Thanks for any help.
Jim
Is @fund nil? I''m guessing here, but the []= could be from the underlying attributes (@fund.id is the same as @fund.attributes[''id'']). On 5/16/07, Jim Hughes <jeem at hughesorama.com> wrote:> > Here''s a snippet: > > it "should provide the fund" do > get(:timesheet,{:id=>@fund.id}) > assigns[:fund].should == @fund > end > > Works fine on my box, fails on my CI server. Here''s the output: > > NoMethodError in ''The FundController timesheet should provide the fund'' > You have a nil object when you didn''t expect it! > You might have expected an instance of Array. > The error occurred while evaluating nil.[]> ./spec/controllers/fund_controller_spec.rb:19: > ./script/spec:4: > > The line raising is the "get" line. I don''t see a foo[bar] = x, > implied anywhere in the statement. > > Has anyone seen this? > > Thanks for any help. > > Jim > _______________________________________________ > rspec-users mailing list > rspec-users at rubyforge.org > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users >-------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/rspec-users/attachments/20070516/27b5a1fe/attachment.html
Thank you for the reply.
Doesn''t look like it. The setup does this:
@fund = mock_model(Fund)
Fund.should_receive(:find).with(@fund.id.to_s).and_return(@fund)
I changed setup to say
@fund = mock_model(Fund)
@fund_id = @fund.id
Fund.should_receive(:find).with(@fund.id.to_s).and_return(@fund)
And the test to
it "should provide the fund" do
@fund_id.should_not be(nil)
get(:timesheet,{:id=>@fund_id})
assigns[:fund].should == @fund
end
Still gives the same error on the "get" line.
Jim
On May 16, 2007, at 12:57 AM, Jeff Dean wrote:
> Is @fund nil? I''m guessing here, but the []= could be from the
> underlying attributes (@fund.id is the same as @fund.attributes
> [''id'']).
>
> On 5/16/07, Jim Hughes <jeem at hughesorama.com> wrote:
> Here''s a snippet:
>
> it "should provide the fund" do
> get(:timesheet,{:id=>@fund.id})
> assigns[:fund].should == @fund
> end
>
> Works fine on my box, fails on my CI server. Here''s the output:
>
> NoMethodError in ''The FundController timesheet should provide the
> fund''
> You have a nil object when you didn''t expect it!
> You might have expected an instance of Array.
> The error occurred while evaluating nil.[]>
./spec/controllers/fund_controller_spec.rb:19:
> ./script/spec:4:
>
> The line raising is the "get" line. I don''t see a
foo[bar] = x,
> implied anywhere in the statement.
>
> Has anyone seen this?
>
> Thanks for any help.
>
> Jim
> _______________________________________________
> rspec-users mailing list
> rspec-users at rubyforge.org
> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
>
> _______________________________________________
> rspec-users mailing list
> rspec-users at rubyforge.org
> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/rspec-users/attachments/20070516/f97224d0/attachment.html