rspec users - Apr 2007 - --color doesn''t work with --drb w/rspec_autotest

If I got this to work, do you think we could/should check in  
rspec_autotest into rspec?

I''ve updated rspec_autotest abit, so let me know if you''d like
the
modified code.

Scott

On 4/1/07, Scott Taylor <mailing_lists at railsnewbie.com>
wrote:
>
> If I got this to work, do you think we could/should check in
> rspec_autotest into rspec?
>
> I''ve updated rspec_autotest abit, so let me know if you''d
like the
> modified code.
>
> Scott
This is an interesting idea but I want to coordinate w/
rspec_autotest''s author first. I''ll get back to the list after
I hear
back from him.

David
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> rspec-users mailing list
> rspec-users at rubyforge.org
> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
>

On Apr 1, 2007, at 11:03 AM, David Chelimsky wrote:
> On 4/1/07, Scott Taylor <mailing_lists at railsnewbie.com> wrote:
>>
>> If I got this to work, do you think we could/should check in
>> rspec_autotest into rspec?
>>
>> I''ve updated rspec_autotest abit, so let me know if
you''d like the
>> modified code.
>>
>> Scott
>
> This is an interesting idea but I want to coordinate w/
> rspec_autotest''s author first. I''ll get back to the list
after I hear
> back from him.
>
> David
Yeah - I believe I tried to email him and the email on his blog was  
broken.

I know that he was trying to integrate this with autotest.  Last I  
checked (a few days ago), Autotest has a bug in its tracker relating  
to rspec_autotest.  So maybe this piece of software belongs in autotest.

If "getting the names right" is as a big of a deal as you guys claim  
it is, then the tool should properly be labeled "autospec".  Or maybe
just "ln -s" it.

As for the red/green issue - someone else on the mailing list claimed  
that they could use drb w/ color - so it would be interesting to hear  
exactly what their configuration is (what rspec/rspec_on_rails setup  
they have).

Out of my own curiosity (and also for fixing the autospec bug), how  
is the red/green color generated in rspec?  Or rather, can you point  
me to the code that does so?  I''ve only been able to find the opts(-- 
color) line in the runner.

And finally a third thing: I''m almost done over-hauling the doc  
system to use webgen 0.4.2.  I''ll post the code to the tracker when  
I''m done with that.

Scott

On 4/1/07, Scott Taylor <mailing_lists at railsnewbie.com>
wrote:
>
> On Apr 1, 2007, at 11:03 AM, David Chelimsky wrote:
>
> > On 4/1/07, Scott Taylor <mailing_lists at railsnewbie.com>
wrote:
> >>
> >> If I got this to work, do you think we could/should check in
> >> rspec_autotest into rspec?
> >>
> >> I''ve updated rspec_autotest abit, so let me know if
you''d like the
> >> modified code.
> >>
> >> Scott
> >
> > This is an interesting idea but I want to coordinate w/
> > rspec_autotest''s author first. I''ll get back to the
list after I hear
> > back from him.
> >
> > David
>
> Yeah - I believe I tried to email him and the email on his blog was
> broken.
>
> I know that he was trying to integrate this with autotest.  Last I
> checked (a few days ago), Autotest has a bug in its tracker relating
> to rspec_autotest.  So maybe this piece of software belongs in autotest.
If that''s true then I''ll try to coordinate w/ Ryan and Eric.
>
> If "getting the names right" is as a big of a deal as you guys
claim
> it is, then the tool should properly be labeled "autospec".  Or
maybe
> just "ln -s" it.
Sure - that''s just a name in a rake task. So most likely it would end
up being something like spec:auto
>
> As for the red/green issue - someone else on the mailing list claimed
> that they could use drb w/ color - so it would be interesting to hear
> exactly what their configuration is (what rspec/rspec_on_rails setup
> they have).
>
> Out of my own curiosity (and also for fixing the autospec bug), how
> is the red/green color generated in rspec?  Or rather, can you point
> me to the code that does so?  I''ve only been able to find the
opts(--
> color) line in the runner.
Look at base_text_formatter.rb
>
> And finally a third thing: I''m almost done over-hauling the doc
> system to use webgen 0.4.2.  I''ll post the code to the tracker
when
> I''m done with that.
Great. I look forward to it.

Thanks Scott,
David
>
> Scott
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> rspec-users mailing list
> rspec-users at rubyforge.org
> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
>

On 4/1/07, Scott Taylor <mailing_lists at railsnewbie.com> wrote:
> And finally a third thing: I''m almost done over-hauling the doc
> system to use webgen 0.4.2.  I''ll post the code to the tracker
when
> I''m done with that.
>
> Scott
How close are you on this? I''m trying to do some planning.

Thx,
David

Right now I just have the main style sheet to change a bit, as one or  
two of the CSS classes have changed.

I''d also like to write a small shell script to diff the results of  
the output directories (unless I can do this with svn?) just to make  
sure nothing (significant) has changed.  By the looks of it  
everything looks about ready to go.

Otherwise the content parser (for textile + ruby html tags) has  
totally been rewritten.

All of the meta.info files (containing the directory hiarchies) has  
been consolidated into one file at the root of doc.  I''m not sure if  
you consider this a feature or not, although it seems to be required  
by webgen 0.4.2.  I''ve posted to their mailing list to see if I can  
go back to the old system (of having meta.info files in each subdir  
which has a menu).  I haven''t gotten a response yet.

So, pretty close.  I should be done with it by tomorrow, if  
everything goes well, or by the end of the week if one employs a  
conservative measure.

Best,

Scott



On Apr 3, 2007, at 9:03 AM, David Chelimsky wrote:
> On 4/1/07, Scott Taylor <mailing_lists at railsnewbie.com> wrote:
>
>> And finally a third thing: I''m almost done over-hauling the
doc
>> system to use webgen 0.4.2.  I''ll post the code to the tracker
when
>> I''m done with that.
>>
>> Scott
>
> How close are you on this? I''m trying to do some planning.
>
> Thx,
> David
> _______________________________________________
> rspec-users mailing list
> rspec-users at rubyforge.org
> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users

On 4/3/07, Scott Taylor <mailing_lists at railsnewbie.com>
wrote:
>
> Right now I just have the main style sheet to change a bit, as one or
> two of the CSS classes have changed.
>
> I''d also like to write a small shell script to diff the results of
> the output directories (unless I can do this with svn?) just to make
> sure nothing (significant) has changed.  By the looks of it
> everything looks about ready to go.
>
> Otherwise the content parser (for textile + ruby html tags) has
> totally been rewritten.
>
> All of the meta.info files (containing the directory hiarchies) has
> been consolidated into one file at the root of doc.  I''m not sure
if
> you consider this a feature or not, although it seems to be required
> by webgen 0.4.2.  I''ve posted to their mailing list to see if I
can
> go back to the old system (of having meta.info files in each subdir
> which has a menu).  I haven''t gotten a response yet.
>
Actually, having one single meta.info file at the top would be great!
I''m planning to add a Javascript-backed menu to the site to make it
more navigable, and this would be a great starting point.

Aslak
> So, pretty close.  I should be done with it by tomorrow, if
> everything goes well, or by the end of the week if one employs a
> conservative measure.
>
> Best,
>
> Scott
>
>
>
> On Apr 3, 2007, at 9:03 AM, David Chelimsky wrote:
>
> > On 4/1/07, Scott Taylor <mailing_lists at railsnewbie.com>
wrote:
> >
> >> And finally a third thing: I''m almost done over-hauling
the doc
> >> system to use webgen 0.4.2.  I''ll post the code to the
tracker when
> >> I''m done with that.
> >>
> >> Scott
> >
> > How close are you on this? I''m trying to do some planning.
> >
> > Thx,
> > David
> > _______________________________________________
> > rspec-users mailing list
> > rspec-users at rubyforge.org
> > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
>
> _______________________________________________
> rspec-users mailing list
> rspec-users at rubyforge.org
> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
>

>
> Actually, having one single meta.info file at the top would be great!
> I''m planning to add a Javascript-backed menu to the site to make
it
> more navigable, and this would be a great starting point.
>
> Aslak
>
>> So, pretty close.  I should be done with it by tomorrow, if
>> everything goes well, or by the end of the week if one employs a
>> conservative measure.

Actually the file is now called metainfo.yaml, just for your  
information.

Is there any other non-textile content in any of the src files for  
webgen?  All I''ve seen so far is <ruby></ruby>, <ruby
file="" />, and
<code>

....Anything else that isn''t textile?

Scott

On 4/4/07, Scott Taylor <mailing_lists at railsnewbie.com>
wrote:
> >
> > Actually, having one single meta.info file at the top would be great!
> > I''m planning to add a Javascript-backed menu to the site to
make it
> > more navigable, and this would be a great starting point.
> >
> > Aslak
> >
> >> So, pretty close.  I should be done with it by tomorrow, if
> >> everything goes well, or by the end of the week if one employs a
> >> conservative measure.
>
>
> Actually the file is now called metainfo.yaml, just for your
> information.
>
> Is there any other non-textile content in any of the src files for
> webgen?  All I''ve seen so far is <ruby></ruby>,
<ruby file="" />, and
> <code>
>
> ....Anything else that isn''t textile?
>
Not that I know of.
> Scott
>
> _______________________________________________
> rspec-users mailing list
> rspec-users at rubyforge.org
> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
>

Actually there were are a few span tags in there.  I''ve reworked the  
system so that this is no longer a problem.

The only thing left to do is figure out why the links to static pages  
in metainfo.yaml aren''t working.  Here are their definitions:

documentation/report.html:
   title: RSpec Report
   url: ../report.html
   inMenu: true
   orderInfo: 55

documentation/rdoc.html:
   title: RDoc
   url: ../rdoc/index.html
   inMenu: true
   orderInfo: 60

documentation/rcov.html:
   title: RCov
   url: ../coverage/index.html
   inMenu: true
   orderInfo: 70

documentation/rails/rdoc.html:
   title: RDoc
   url: ../../rdoc-rails/index.html
   inMenu: true
   orderInfo: 130


Any ideas?  Are these created by a rake task?

Scott




On Apr 4, 2007, at 3:44 AM, aslak hellesoy wrote:
> On 4/4/07, Scott Taylor <mailing_lists at railsnewbie.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Actually, having one single meta.info file at the top would be  
>>> great!
>>> I''m planning to add a Javascript-backed menu to the site
to make it
>>> more navigable, and this would be a great starting point.
>>>
>>> Aslak
>>>
>>>> So, pretty close.  I should be done with it by tomorrow, if
>>>> everything goes well, or by the end of the week if one employs
a
>>>> conservative measure.
>>
>>
>> Actually the file is now called metainfo.yaml, just for your
>> information.
>>
>> Is there any other non-textile content in any of the src files for
>> webgen?  All I''ve seen so far is <ruby></ruby>,
<ruby file="" />, and
>> <code>
>>
>> ....Anything else that isn''t textile?
>>
>
> Not that I know of.
>
>> Scott
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> rspec-users mailing list
>> rspec-users at rubyforge.org
>> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
>>
> _______________________________________________
> rspec-users mailing list
> rspec-users at rubyforge.org
> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users

On 4/4/07, Scott Taylor <mailing_lists at railsnewbie.com>
wrote:
>
> Actually there were are a few span tags in there.  I''ve reworked
the
> system so that this is no longer a problem.
>
> The only thing left to do is figure out why the links to static pages
> in metainfo.yaml aren''t working.  Here are their definitions:
>
> documentation/report.html:
>    title: RSpec Report
>    url: ../report.html
>    inMenu: true
>    orderInfo: 55
>
> documentation/rdoc.html:
>    title: RDoc
>    url: ../rdoc/index.html
>    inMenu: true
>    orderInfo: 60
>
> documentation/rcov.html:
>    title: RCov
>    url: ../coverage/index.html
>    inMenu: true
>    orderInfo: 70
>
> documentation/rails/rdoc.html:
>    title: RDoc
>    url: ../../rdoc-rails/index.html
>    inMenu: true
>    orderInfo: 130
>
>
> Any ideas?  Are these created by a rake task?
Yes. If that''s all that''s left go ahead and submit the patch
and I''ll
resolve any links that aren''t working.

Thanks.
>
> Scott
>
>
>
>
> On Apr 4, 2007, at 3:44 AM, aslak hellesoy wrote:
>
> > On 4/4/07, Scott Taylor <mailing_lists at railsnewbie.com>
wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Actually, having one single meta.info file at the top would be
> >>> great!
> >>> I''m planning to add a Javascript-backed menu to the
site to make it
> >>> more navigable, and this would be a great starting point.
> >>>
> >>> Aslak
> >>>
> >>>> So, pretty close.  I should be done with it by tomorrow,
if
> >>>> everything goes well, or by the end of the week if one
employs a
> >>>> conservative measure.
> >>
> >>
> >> Actually the file is now called metainfo.yaml, just for your
> >> information.
> >>
> >> Is there any other non-textile content in any of the src files for
> >> webgen?  All I''ve seen so far is
<ruby></ruby>, <ruby file="" />, and
> >> <code>
> >>
> >> ....Anything else that isn''t textile?
> >>
> >
> > Not that I know of.
> >
> >> Scott
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> rspec-users mailing list
> >> rspec-users at rubyforge.org
> >> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
> >>
> > _______________________________________________
> > rspec-users mailing list
> > rspec-users at rubyforge.org
> > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
>
> _______________________________________________
> rspec-users mailing list
> rspec-users at rubyforge.org
> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
>

I''ve patched against the 0.8 trunk and am going to submit it through  
the tracker.

Scott


On Apr 4, 2007, at 10:46 PM, David Chelimsky wrote:
> On 4/4/07, Scott Taylor <mailing_lists at railsnewbie.com> wrote:
>>
>> Actually there were are a few span tags in there.  I''ve
reworked the
>> system so that this is no longer a problem.
>>
>> The only thing left to do is figure out why the links to static pages
>> in metainfo.yaml aren''t working.  Here are their definitions:
>>
>> documentation/report.html:
>>    title: RSpec Report
>>    url: ../report.html
>>    inMenu: true
>>    orderInfo: 55
>>
>> documentation/rdoc.html:
>>    title: RDoc
>>    url: ../rdoc/index.html
>>    inMenu: true
>>    orderInfo: 60
>>
>> documentation/rcov.html:
>>    title: RCov
>>    url: ../coverage/index.html
>>    inMenu: true
>>    orderInfo: 70
>>
>> documentation/rails/rdoc.html:
>>    title: RDoc
>>    url: ../../rdoc-rails/index.html
>>    inMenu: true
>>    orderInfo: 130
>>
>>
>> Any ideas?  Are these created by a rake task?
>
> Yes. If that''s all that''s left go ahead and submit the
patch and I''ll
> resolve any links that aren''t working.
>
> Thanks.
>
>>
>> Scott
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Apr 4, 2007, at 3:44 AM, aslak hellesoy wrote:
>>
>>> On 4/4/07, Scott Taylor <mailing_lists at railsnewbie.com>
wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Actually, having one single meta.info file at the top would
be
>>>>> great!
>>>>> I''m planning to add a Javascript-backed menu to
the site to
>>>>> make it
>>>>> more navigable, and this would be a great starting point.
>>>>>
>>>>> Aslak
>>>>>
>>>>>> So, pretty close.  I should be done with it by
tomorrow, if
>>>>>> everything goes well, or by the end of the week if one
employs a
>>>>>> conservative measure.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Actually the file is now called metainfo.yaml, just for your
>>>> information.
>>>>
>>>> Is there any other non-textile content in any of the src files
for
>>>> webgen?  All I''ve seen so far is
<ruby></ruby>, <ruby file="" /
>>>> >, and
>>>> <code>
>>>>
>>>> ....Anything else that isn''t textile?
>>>>
>>>
>>> Not that I know of.
>>>
>>>> Scott
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> rspec-users mailing list
>>>> rspec-users at rubyforge.org
>>>> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
>>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> rspec-users mailing list
>>> rspec-users at rubyforge.org
>>> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> rspec-users mailing list
>> rspec-users at rubyforge.org
>> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
>>
> _______________________________________________
> rspec-users mailing list
> rspec-users at rubyforge.org
> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users