rspec users - Jan 2007 - should expectation syntax has changed

This is just a note in case anyone else is using the (I believe  
experimental) custom expectations.

The custom expectation I had written used the custom ''met_by?''
function, which now appears to have been replaced by the
''matches?''
function to determine whether the expectation is met.

Steve

To be clear, this ONLY applies to those of you using trunk and
experimenting with an un-released feature supporting custom
expectations.

To those of you who are, it is now pretty much how it will be
released, so if you use #matches?, failure_message and
negative_failure_message you should be OK.

Cheers,
David

On 1/27/07, s.ross <cwdinfo at gmail.com> wrote:
> This is just a note in case anyone else is using the (I believe
> experimental) custom expectations.
>
> The custom expectation I had written used the custom
''met_by?''
> function, which now appears to have been replaced by the
''matches?''
> function to determine whether the expectation is met.
>
> Steve
>
> _______________________________________________
> rspec-users mailing list
> rspec-users at rubyforge.org
> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
>