I know this is deprecated in 1.6, but my question is how do I properly use the native browser implementation? Do I need to change my code? I''m having a difficult time finding examples on this. Why is this deprecated instead of incorporated into prototype? Or did I answer my own question... Also, I want to utilize the new document.querySelector. Has some one implemented this inside prototype and I don''t have to change anything to take advantage of it? --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Spinoffs" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-spinoffs-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-spinoffs-unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-spinoffs?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
it says why next to the exclamation point on that page! http://www.prototypejs.org/api/element/getElementsByClassName what''s more, its better to use the $$() function since I think it transparently extends the prototype stuff in the elements returned with the selector ...and if querySelector() does what it says i think it does in the spec... http://www.w3.org/TR/selectors-api/#documentselector couldn''t you you just use the prototype class selector $$() and get the first element? like $$(''class'')[0]? On Fri, Mar 21, 2008 at 12:50 PM, Namotco <namotco-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> wrote:> > I know this is deprecated in 1.6, but my question is how do I properly > use the native browser implementation? Do I need to change my code? > I''m having a difficult time finding examples on this. Why is this > deprecated instead of incorporated into prototype? Or did I answer my > own question... > > Also, I want to utilize the new document.querySelector. Has some one > implemented this inside prototype and I don''t have to change anything > to take advantage of it? > > >--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Spinoffs" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-spinoffs-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-spinoffs-unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-spinoffs?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
The reason I''d prefer to be using the native implementations is speed. Yes, I know prototype already does these things, but in my application I would like to have the additional performance provided by the native implementations. So my question is as a prototype user, how do I get the speed benefit of these new native technologies? --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Spinoffs" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-spinoffs-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-spinoffs-unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-spinoffs?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
Namotco, JDD already worked on patching prototype to use querySelector [1]. The problem is that there are some inconsistencies in the way $$ and document.querySelector work. The support for native selectors might make it''s way into 1.6.1 version of prototype. [1] http://dev.rubyonrails.org/ticket/11085 - kangax On Mar 22, 12:45 pm, Namotco <namo...-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> wrote:> The reason I''d prefer to be using the native implementations is > speed. Yes, I know prototype already does these things, but in my > application I would like to have the additional performance provided > by the native implementations. > > So my question is as a prototype user, how do I get the speed benefit > of these new native technologies?--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Spinoffs" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-spinoffs-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-spinoffs-unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-spinoffs?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
Apparently Analagous Threads
- Limiting getElementsByClassName to specific nodes and entities
- Bug? IE, getElementsByClassName and "length"
- RE: document.getElementsByClassName (prototype) andElement.childrenWithClassName (scriptaculous) redundancy?
- getElementsByClassName
- document.getElementsByClassName (prototype) and Element.childrenWithClassName (scriptaculous) redundancy?