chuyeow
2007-Dec-07 02:32 UTC
[ActiveSupport] Patches needing review: re-organization of #to_query methods, preservation of XML/JSON content-type
Just a quick pointer to some ActiveSupport patches hoping for reviews: Puts Array#to_query and Object#to_query in the right places in ActiveSupport - http://dev.rubyonrails.org/ticket/10395 Preserve user-specified content type for XML and JSON rendering (currently it''s overridden and set to Mime::XML/Mimi::JSON - http://dev.rubyonrails.org/ticket/10388 Oh and a tiny patch for inconsistency in #to_sentence: http://dev.rubyonrails.org/ticket/10390 and a trivial doc patch for Date.yesterday and Date.today: http://dev.rubyonrails.org/ticket/10375 Reviews appreciated! Thanks! Cheers, Chu Yeow PS Rails 2.0 is almost here it seems: http://dev.rubyonrails.org/changeset/8321 --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Core" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-core@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-core-unsubscribe@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-core?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
Frederick Cheung
2007-Dec-07 08:33 UTC
Re: [ActiveSupport] Patches needing review: re-organization of #to_query methods, preservation of XML/JSON content-type
On the subject of really teenie-tinies, there''s http://dev.rubyonrails.org/ticket/10380 The default double render error message still goes on about filters needing to explicitly return false, which is no longer accurate On 7 Dec 2007, at 02:32, chuyeow wrote:> > Just a quick pointer to some ActiveSupport patches hoping for reviews: > > Puts Array#to_query and Object#to_query in the right places in > ActiveSupport - http://dev.rubyonrails.org/ticket/10395 > > Preserve user-specified content type for XML and JSON rendering > (currently it''s overridden and set to Mime::XML/Mimi::JSON - > http://dev.rubyonrails.org/ticket/10388 > > Oh and a tiny patch for inconsistency in #to_sentence: > http://dev.rubyonrails.org/ticket/10390 and a trivial doc patch for > Date.yesterday and Date.today: http://dev.rubyonrails.org/ticket/10375 > > Reviews appreciated! Thanks! > > Cheers, > Chu Yeow > > PS Rails 2.0 is almost here it seems: http://dev.rubyonrails.org/changeset/8321 > >--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Core" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-core@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-core-unsubscribe@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-core?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
chuyeow
2007-Dec-09 16:05 UTC
Re: [ActiveSupport] Patches needing review: re-organization of #to_query methods, preservation of XML/JSON content-type
Just a bump hoping to get some +1 love - I think my post got lost since I posted it while the Core team was pushing out 2.0.0. On Dec 7, 4:33 pm, Frederick Cheung <frederick.che...@gmail.com> wrote:> On the subject of really teenie-tinies, there''shttp://dev.rubyonrails.org/ticket/10380 > The default double render error message still goes on about filters > needing to explicitly return false, which is no longer accurate > > On 7 Dec 2007, at 02:32, chuyeow wrote: > > > > > Just a quick pointer to some ActiveSupport patches hoping for reviews: > > > Puts Array#to_query and Object#to_query in the right places in > > ActiveSupport -http://dev.rubyonrails.org/ticket/10395 > > > Preserve user-specified content type for XML and JSON rendering > > (currently it''s overridden and set to Mime::XML/Mimi::JSON - > >http://dev.rubyonrails.org/ticket/10388 > > > Oh and a tiny patch for inconsistency in #to_sentence: > >http://dev.rubyonrails.org/ticket/10390and a trivial doc patch for > > Date.yesterday and Date.today:http://dev.rubyonrails.org/ticket/10375 > > > Reviews appreciated! Thanks! > > > Cheers, > > Chu Yeow > > > PS Rails 2.0 is almost here it seems:http://dev.rubyonrails.org/changeset/8321--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Core" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-core@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-core-unsubscribe@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-core?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
Reasonably Related Threads
- 2 more JSON / XML feature parity patches before Rails 2.0
- [PATCH] x 2 - Fix for "null pointer exception" when ask_status is called before worker is run, and docfixes
- Merb-style development exception pages for Mac OS X
- Rails shouldn't output invalid JSON by default
- Trac not for general use?