"Within R one can use source() to run a batch file of R commands, while R
CMD BATCH
and Rscript are run from the command line. Is this correct?"
Yes.
I think your query answers your query: You use Rscript when you want to use
R in the command environment, perhaps as part of an analytical pipeline;
and you source an R file when you want to work within R.
Cheers,
Bert
Bert Gunter
"The trouble with having an open mind is that people keep coming along and
sticking things into it."
-- Opus (aka Berkeley Breathed in his "Bloom County" comic strip )
On Wed, Jul 25, 2018 at 7:41 AM, Rich Shepard <rshepard at
appl-ecosys.com>
wrote:
> Within R one can use source() to run a batch file of R commands, while R
> CMD BATCH
> and Rscript are run from the command line. Is this correct?
>
> Given these choices, when would I want to run a script within R using
> source(), and when would it be better for me to run it from the command
> line?
>
> Reading Appendix B.4 Scripting with R in R-info.pdf, ?Rscipt, and ?BATCH
> I
> get the impression that 'R CMD BATCH' reads from a named file and
writes
> output to a named file and Rscript reads/writes to stdin/stdout using
> redirection. What are the pros and cons of each? When (or why) would I
> select one over the other?
>
> TIA,
>
> Rich
>
> ______________________________________________
> R-help at r-project.org mailing list -- To UNSUBSCRIBE and more, see
> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
> PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posti
> ng-guide.html
> and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
>
[[alternative HTML version deleted]]