Georgi Boshnakov
2018-May-25 14:45 UTC
[Rd] Rd parser throws error for user macros invoked with empty argument
While on the topic of Rd macro arguments, it seems that if a multiline argument is supplied, the lines after the first are silently ignored: f <- tempfile() mac6 <- "\\newcommand{\\mac6}{mac6: #1}" cat(mac6, "\\mac6{2*3 2+2 sin(pi) }\n", file = f) rd <- tools::parse_Rd(f)> rdmac6: 2*3 --- Georgi Boshnakov -----Original Message----- From: Tomas Kalibera [mailto:tomas.kalibera at gmail.com] Sent: 25 May 2018 10:05 To: Georgi Boshnakov; r-devel at r-project.org Subject: Re: [Rd] Rd parser throws error for user macros invoked with empty argument Thanks for the report and the examples - and they do not have to be that verbose, it is enough to just define and use a command, e.g. cat("\\newcommand{\\mac1}{MAC1:#1}\\mac1{}", file=f) rd <- tools::parse_Rd(f) Whenever you get an error message like "Value of SET_STRING_ELT() must be a 'CHARSXP' not a 'NULL'", there is a bug (at least the error message should be relevant/informative). I am testing a patch that will allow empty arguments to macros (they will expand to an empty string, like in LaTeX). Best Tomas On 05/14/2018 11:23 PM, Georgi Boshnakov wrote:> Bug or feature? > > I get the following error from parse_Rd() when a user Rd macro (including system ones) is invoked with empty argument {}, > eg \mymacro{}: > > Error in tools::parse_Rd(fn) : > Value of SET_STRING_ELT() must be a 'CHARSXP' not a 'NULL' > > A full example is further below with the system macro \CRANpkg{}. In this example it doesn't make sense to use empty argument but the error is not specific to this particular macro. > > ------ > Georgi Boshnakov > > > Create an Rd file containing system macro \CRANpkg{bibtex}, parse_Rd() is ok: > > ================> fn <- tempfile() > writeLines("\\name{dummyfun} > \\alias{dummyfun} > \\title{Dummy title} > \\description{Dummy description} > \\usage{ > dummyfun(x, ...) > } > \\arguments{ > \\item{x}{a value.} > \\item{\\dots}{further arguments.} > } > \\details{ > \\CRANpkg{bibtex} > } > ", fn) > >> tools::parse_Rd(fn) > ... > \details{ > \href{{https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=bibtex}{\pkg{bibtex}}} > } > > ===============> > With empty argument - \CRANpkg{} - Rd parser throws error. Of course it is silly in this example but I have used it with other user defined macros where it may make sense to have empty argument. > > ===============>> writeLines("\\name{dummyfun} > \\alias{dummyfun} > \\title{Dummy title} > \\description{Dummy description} > \\usage{ > dummyfun(x, ...) > } > \\arguments{ > \\item{x}{a value.} > \\item{\\dots}{further arguments.} > } > \\details{ > \\CRANpkg{} > } > ", fn) >> tools::parse_Rd(fn) > Error in tools::parse_Rd(fn) : > Value of SET_STRING_ELT() must be a 'CHARSXP' not a 'NULL' > > [[alternative HTML version deleted]] > > ______________________________________________ > R-devel at r-project.org mailing list > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
Tomas Kalibera
2018-Jun-01 09:33 UTC
[Rd] user macros with multi-line arguments in Rd (was Re: Rd parser throws error for user macros invoked with empty argument)
Thanks for the report, I am testing a patch that will allow multi-line arguments to user macros. Best Tomas On 05/25/2018 04:45 PM, Georgi Boshnakov wrote:> While on the topic of Rd macro arguments, it seems that if a multiline argument is supplied, the lines after the first are silently ignored: > > f <- tempfile() > mac6 <- "\\newcommand{\\mac6}{mac6: #1}" > > cat(mac6, "\\mac6{2*3 > 2+2 > sin(pi) > }\n", file = f) > rd <- tools::parse_Rd(f) > >> rd > mac6: 2*3 > > --- > > Georgi Boshnakov > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Tomas Kalibera [mailto:tomas.kalibera at gmail.com] > Sent: 25 May 2018 10:05 > To: Georgi Boshnakov; r-devel at r-project.org > Subject: Re: [Rd] Rd parser throws error for user macros invoked with empty argument > > Thanks for the report and the examples - and they do not have to be that > verbose, it is enough to just define and use a command, e.g. > > cat("\\newcommand{\\mac1}{MAC1:#1}\\mac1{}", file=f) > rd <- tools::parse_Rd(f) > > Whenever you get an error message like "Value of SET_STRING_ELT() must > be a 'CHARSXP' not a 'NULL'", there is a bug (at least the error message > should be relevant/informative). > > I am testing a patch that will allow empty arguments to macros (they > will expand to an empty string, like in LaTeX). > > Best > Tomas > > On 05/14/2018 11:23 PM, Georgi Boshnakov wrote: >> Bug or feature? >> >> I get the following error from parse_Rd() when a user Rd macro (including system ones) is invoked with empty argument {}, >> eg \mymacro{}: >> >> Error in tools::parse_Rd(fn) : >> Value of SET_STRING_ELT() must be a 'CHARSXP' not a 'NULL' >> >> A full example is further below with the system macro \CRANpkg{}. In this example it doesn't make sense to use empty argument but the error is not specific to this particular macro. >> >> ------ >> Georgi Boshnakov >> >> >> Create an Rd file containing system macro \CRANpkg{bibtex}, parse_Rd() is ok: >> >> ================>> fn <- tempfile() >> writeLines("\\name{dummyfun} >> \\alias{dummyfun} >> \\title{Dummy title} >> \\description{Dummy description} >> \\usage{ >> dummyfun(x, ...) >> } >> \\arguments{ >> \\item{x}{a value.} >> \\item{\\dots}{further arguments.} >> } >> \\details{ >> \\CRANpkg{bibtex} >> } >> ", fn) >> >>> tools::parse_Rd(fn) >> ... >> \details{ >> \href{{https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=bibtex}{\pkg{bibtex}}} >> } >> >> ===============>> >> With empty argument - \CRANpkg{} - Rd parser throws error. Of course it is silly in this example but I have used it with other user defined macros where it may make sense to have empty argument. >> >> ===============>>> writeLines("\\name{dummyfun} >> \\alias{dummyfun} >> \\title{Dummy title} >> \\description{Dummy description} >> \\usage{ >> dummyfun(x, ...) >> } >> \\arguments{ >> \\item{x}{a value.} >> \\item{\\dots}{further arguments.} >> } >> \\details{ >> \\CRANpkg{} >> } >> ", fn) >>> tools::parse_Rd(fn) >> Error in tools::parse_Rd(fn) : >> Value of SET_STRING_ELT() must be a 'CHARSXP' not a 'NULL' >> >> [[alternative HTML version deleted]] >> >> ______________________________________________ >> R-devel at r-project.org mailing list >> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel >
Tomas Kalibera
2018-Jun-04 20:28 UTC
[Rd] user macros with multi-line arguments in Rd (was Re: Rd parser throws error for user macros invoked with empty argument)
Now in R-devel, Best, Tomas On 06/01/2018 11:33 AM, Tomas Kalibera wrote:> Thanks for the report, I am testing a patch that will allow multi-line > arguments to user macros. > > Best > Tomas > > On 05/25/2018 04:45 PM, Georgi Boshnakov wrote: >> While on the topic of Rd macro arguments, it seems that? if a >> multiline argument is supplied, the lines after the first are >> silently ignored: >> >> f <- tempfile() >> mac6 <- "\\newcommand{\\mac6}{mac6: #1}" >> >> cat(mac6, "\\mac6{2*3 >> 2+2 >> sin(pi) >> }\n", file = f) >> rd <- tools::parse_Rd(f) >> >>> rd >> ? mac6: 2*3 >> >> --- >> >> Georgi Boshnakov >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Tomas Kalibera [mailto:tomas.kalibera at gmail.com] >> Sent: 25 May 2018 10:05 >> To: Georgi Boshnakov; r-devel at r-project.org >> Subject: Re: [Rd] Rd parser throws error for user macros invoked with >> empty argument >> >> Thanks for the report and the examples - and they do not have to be that >> verbose, it is enough to just define and use a command, e.g. >> >> cat("\\newcommand{\\mac1}{MAC1:#1}\\mac1{}", file=f) >> rd <- tools::parse_Rd(f) >> >> Whenever you get an error message like "Value of SET_STRING_ELT() must >> be a 'CHARSXP' not a 'NULL'", there is a bug (at least the error message >> should be relevant/informative). >> >> I am testing a patch that will allow empty arguments to macros (they >> will expand to an empty string, like in LaTeX). >> >> Best >> Tomas >> >> On 05/14/2018 11:23 PM, Georgi Boshnakov wrote: >>> Bug or feature? >>> >>> I get the following error from parse_Rd() when a user Rd macro >>> (including system ones) is invoked with empty argument {}, >>> eg \mymacro{}: >>> >>> Error in tools::parse_Rd(fn) : >>> ??? Value of SET_STRING_ELT() must be a 'CHARSXP' not a 'NULL' >>> >>> A full example is further below with the system macro \CRANpkg{}. In >>> this example it doesn't make sense to use empty argument but the >>> error is not specific to this particular macro. >>> >>> ------ >>> Georgi Boshnakov >>> >>> >>> Create an Rd file containing system macro \CRANpkg{bibtex}, >>> parse_Rd() is ok: >>> >>> ================>>> fn <- tempfile() >>> writeLines("\\name{dummyfun} >>> \\alias{dummyfun} >>> \\title{Dummy title} >>> \\description{Dummy description} >>> \\usage{ >>> dummyfun(x, ...) >>> } >>> \\arguments{ >>> ??? \\item{x}{a value.} >>> ??? \\item{\\dots}{further arguments.} >>> } >>> \\details{ >>> ????? \\CRANpkg{bibtex} >>> } >>> ", fn) >>> >>>> tools::parse_Rd(fn) >>> ... >>> \details{ >>> \href{{https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=bibtex}{\pkg{bibtex}}} >>> } >>> >>> ===============>>> >>> With empty argument - \CRANpkg{} - Rd parser throws error. Of course >>> it is silly in this example but I have used it with other user >>> defined? macros where it may make sense to have empty argument. >>> >>> ===============>>>> writeLines("\\name{dummyfun} >>> \\alias{dummyfun} >>> \\title{Dummy title} >>> \\description{Dummy description} >>> \\usage{ >>> dummyfun(x, ...) >>> } >>> \\arguments{ >>> ??? \\item{x}{a value.} >>> ??? \\item{\\dots}{further arguments.} >>> } >>> \\details{ >>> ????? \\CRANpkg{} >>> } >>> ", fn) >>>> tools::parse_Rd(fn) >>> Error in tools::parse_Rd(fn) : >>> ??? Value of SET_STRING_ELT() must be a 'CHARSXP' not a 'NULL' >>> >>> ????[[alternative HTML version deleted]] >>> >>> ______________________________________________ >>> R-devel at r-project.org mailing list >>> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel >> >
Maybe Matching Threads
- Rd parser throws error for user macros invoked with empty argument
- Rd parser throws error for user macros invoked with empty argument
- Rd parser throws error for user macros invoked with empty argument
- disappearing paragraphs in html rendering of text from Rd macros
- Is k equivalent to k:k ?