Therneau, Terry M., Ph.D.
2017-Dec-29 13:14 UTC
[Rd] winbuilder warning message wrt function pointers
I've recently updated the coxme package, which calls internal routines from the bdsmatrix package.? (It is in fact mentioned as an example of this in the Extensions manual.) The call connections are a blocks like this, one for each of the 9 called C routines. void bdsmatrix_prod4(int nrow,??? int nblock,?? int *bsize, ??????????????????? double *bmat, double *rmat, ??????????????????? int nfrail,?? double *y) { ??? static void (*fun)() = NULL; ??? if (fun==NULL) ??? fun = (void (*)) R_GetCCallable("bdsmatrix", "bdsmatrix_prod4"); ??? fun(nrow, nblock, bsize, bmat, rmat, nfrail, y); ??? } .. The winbuilder run is flagging all of these with bdsmatrix_stub.h:22:6: warning: ISO C forbids assignment between function pointer and 'void *' [-Wpedantic] ? fun = (void (*)) R_GetCCallable("bdsmatrix", "bdsmatrix_prod4"); Ignore?? Or should these lines have been written in a different way? Terry T.
William Dunlap
2017-Dec-29 16:48 UTC
[Rd] winbuilder warning message wrt function pointers
Try changing static void (*fun)() = NULL; to DL_FUNC fun = NULL; Bill Dunlap TIBCO Software wdunlap tibco.com On Fri, Dec 29, 2017 at 5:14 AM, Therneau, Terry M., Ph.D. < therneau at mayo.edu> wrote:> I've recently updated the coxme package, which calls internal routines > from the bdsmatrix package. (It is in fact mentioned as an example of this > in the Extensions manual.) > The call connections are a blocks like this, one for each of the 9 called > C routines. > > void bdsmatrix_prod4(int nrow, int nblock, int *bsize, > double *bmat, double *rmat, > int nfrail, double *y) { > static void (*fun)() = NULL; > if (fun==NULL) > fun = (void (*)) R_GetCCallable("bdsmatrix", "bdsmatrix_prod4"); > fun(nrow, nblock, bsize, bmat, rmat, nfrail, y); > } > > .. > > The winbuilder run is flagging all of these with > > bdsmatrix_stub.h:22:6: warning: ISO C forbids assignment between function > pointer and 'void *' [-Wpedantic] > fun = (void (*)) R_GetCCallable("bdsmatrix", "bdsmatrix_prod4"); > > Ignore? Or should these lines have been written in a different way? > > Terry T. > > ______________________________________________ > R-devel at r-project.org mailing list > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel[[alternative HTML version deleted]]
William Dunlap
2017-Dec-29 16:52 UTC
[Rd] winbuilder warning message wrt function pointers
And remove the cast on the return value of R_GETCCallable. And check that your function is found before using it. #include <R.h> #include <Rinternals.h> #include <R_ext/Rdynload.h> void bdsmatrix_prod4(int nrow, int nblock, int *bsize, double *bmat, double *rmat, int nfrail, double *y) { DL_FUNC fun = NULL; if (fun==NULL) { fun = R_GetCCallable("bdsmatrix", "bdsmatrix_prod4"); } if (fun==NULL) { Rf_error("Cannot find C function 'bdsmatrix_prod4' in library 'bdsmatrix.{so,dll}'"); } fun(nrow, nblock, bsize, bmat, rmat, nfrail, y); } Bill Dunlap TIBCO Software wdunlap tibco.com On Fri, Dec 29, 2017 at 8:48 AM, William Dunlap <wdunlap at tibco.com> wrote:> Try changing > static void (*fun)() = NULL; > to > DL_FUNC fun = NULL; > > Bill Dunlap > TIBCO Software > wdunlap tibco.com > > On Fri, Dec 29, 2017 at 5:14 AM, Therneau, Terry M., Ph.D. < > therneau at mayo.edu> wrote: > >> I've recently updated the coxme package, which calls internal routines >> from the bdsmatrix package. (It is in fact mentioned as an example of this >> in the Extensions manual.) >> The call connections are a blocks like this, one for each of the 9 called >> C routines. >> >> void bdsmatrix_prod4(int nrow, int nblock, int *bsize, >> double *bmat, double *rmat, >> int nfrail, double *y) { >> static void (*fun)() = NULL; >> if (fun==NULL) >> fun = (void (*)) R_GetCCallable("bdsmatrix", "bdsmatrix_prod4"); >> fun(nrow, nblock, bsize, bmat, rmat, nfrail, y); >> } >> >> .. >> >> The winbuilder run is flagging all of these with >> >> bdsmatrix_stub.h:22:6: warning: ISO C forbids assignment between function >> pointer and 'void *' [-Wpedantic] >> fun = (void (*)) R_GetCCallable("bdsmatrix", "bdsmatrix_prod4"); >> >> Ignore? Or should these lines have been written in a different way? >> >> Terry T. >> >> ______________________________________________ >> R-devel at r-project.org mailing list >> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel > > >[[alternative HTML version deleted]]
William Dunlap
2017-Dec-29 18:19 UTC
[Rd] winbuilder warning message wrt function pointers
You can legally cast a function pointer to another function pointer, where the signatures differ. (It is not legal to cast between data and function pointers.) I would make typedefs for the various signatures, as the casting syntax is more readable then. Bill Dunlap TIBCO Software wdunlap tibco.com On Fri, Dec 29, 2017 at 10:13 AM, Therneau, Terry M., Ph.D. < therneau at mayo.edu> wrote:> Bill, > That's a very nice solution. It is both cleaner looking and preferable > to track R's .h files. > However, some of my routines don't have void * as the return type (two are > int *), and Rdynload has > > typedef void * (*DL_FUNC)(); > > Will this untruth mess anything up? > > Terry T. > > On 12/29/2017 10:52 AM, William Dunlap wrote: > > And remove the cast on the return value of R_GETCCallable. And check > that your function is found before using it. > > #include <R.h> > #include <Rinternals.h> > #include <R_ext/Rdynload.h> > > void bdsmatrix_prod4(int nrow, int nblock, int *bsize, > double *bmat, double *rmat, > int nfrail, double *y) { > DL_FUNC fun = NULL; > if (fun==NULL) { > fun = R_GetCCallable("bdsmatrix", "bdsmatrix_prod4"); > } > if (fun==NULL) { > Rf_error("Cannot find C function 'bdsmatrix_prod4' in library > 'bdsmatrix.{so,dll}'"); > } > fun(nrow, nblock, bsize, bmat, rmat, nfrail, y); > } > > > > > Bill Dunlap > TIBCO Software > wdunlap tibco.com > > On Fri, Dec 29, 2017 at 8:48 AM, William Dunlap <wdunlap at tibco.com> wrote: > >> Try changing >> static void (*fun)() = NULL; >> to >> DL_FUNC fun = NULL; >> >> Bill Dunlap >> TIBCO Software >> wdunlap tibco.com >> >> On Fri, Dec 29, 2017 at 5:14 AM, Therneau, Terry M., Ph.D. < >> therneau at mayo.edu> wrote: >> >>> I've recently updated the coxme package, which calls internal routines >>> from the bdsmatrix package. (It is in fact mentioned as an example of this >>> in the Extensions manual.) >>> The call connections are a blocks like this, one for each of the 9 >>> called C routines. >>> >>> void bdsmatrix_prod4(int nrow, int nblock, int *bsize, >>> double *bmat, double *rmat, >>> int nfrail, double *y) { >>> static void (*fun)() = NULL; >>> if (fun==NULL) >>> fun = (void (*)) R_GetCCallable("bdsmatrix", "bdsmatrix_prod4"); >>> fun(nrow, nblock, bsize, bmat, rmat, nfrail, y); >>> } >>> >>> .. >>> >>> The winbuilder run is flagging all of these with >>> >>> bdsmatrix_stub.h:22:6: warning: ISO C forbids assignment between >>> function pointer and 'void *' [-Wpedantic] >>> fun = (void (*)) R_GetCCallable("bdsmatrix", "bdsmatrix_prod4"); >>> >>> Ignore? Or should these lines have been written in a different way? >>> >>> Terry T. >>> >>> ______________________________________________ >>> R-devel at r-project.org mailing list >>> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel >> >> >> > >[[alternative HTML version deleted]]