Gavin Simpson
2013-Aug-23 15:15 UTC
[Rd] Accessing the formals() of a non-exported method without :::?
Dear List, I'm in the process of making tweaks to my various R packages following changes in r-devel for package checks. I'm wondering about the one use of ::: in one of my packages. I am arranging for a call to a non-exported S3 method via do.call. For this I need the arguments of the function and hence I was doing Args <- head(formals(analogue:::wa.default), -1) Following the recent thread on legitimate uses of ::: I think the above is both acceptable and won't generate a Note now with R CMD check following a recent change to that code. But is there a better way to get the formal arguments of a non-exported S3 method? Thanks. G -- Gavin Simpson
R. Michael Weylandt <michael.weylandt@gmail.com>
2013-Aug-23 15:27 UTC
[Rd] Accessing the formals() of a non-exported method without :::?
On Aug 23, 2013, at 11:15, Gavin Simpson <ucfagls at gmail.com> wrote:> Dear List, > > I'm in the process of making tweaks to my various R packages following > changes in r-devel for package checks. I'm wondering about the one use > of ::: in one of my packages. I am arranging for a call to a > non-exported S3 method via do.call. For this I need the arguments of > the function and hence I was doing > > Args <- head(formals(analogue:::wa.default), -1) > > Following the recent thread on legitimate uses of ::: I think the > above is both acceptable and won't generate a Note now with R CMD > check following a recent change to that code. But is there a better > way to get the formal arguments of a non-exported S3 method? >Something like (untested) formalsS3 <- function(...) formals(getS3method(...)) might work. I haven't checked to see how R CMD check feels about getS3method() though. Michael> Thanks. > > G > > -- > Gavin Simpson > > ______________________________________________ > R-devel at r-project.org mailing list > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel