ripley at stats.ox.ac.uk
2009-Aug-06 17:00 UTC
[Rd] Inconsistent documentation in Writing R Extensions (PR#13878)
On Thu, 6 Aug 2009, Brandon.J.Whitcher at gsk.com wrote:> Greetings, > > I think there is an inconsistency in the Writing R Extensions document. > Please let me know if I am right or wrong on this one. > > Working from the PDF document (R-exts-2.9.1.pdf) > > - page 9 states that the file <pkg>-Ex.Rout.save should be placed in > tests/Examples in order to check against the current set of examples. > - page 17 (item 16) states that the file <pkg>-Ex-Rout.save should be > placed in tests/Examples. > > I have checked in one of my packages, and I believe the first case > <pkg>-Ex.Rout.save is correct. Is this true?Yes.> > cheers... > > Brandon > > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This e-mail was sent by GlaxoSmithKline Services Unlimited > (registered in England and Wales No. 1047315), which is a > member of the GlaxoSmithKline group of companies. The > registered address of GlaxoSmithKline Services Unlimited > is 980 Great West Road, Brentford, Middlesex TW8 9GS. > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > [[alternative HTML version deleted]] > > ______________________________________________ > R-devel at r-project.org mailing list > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel >-- Brian D. Ripley, ripley at stats.ox.ac.uk Professor of Applied Statistics, http://www.stats.ox.ac.uk/~ripley/ University of Oxford, Tel: +44 1865 272861 (self) 1 South Parks Road, +44 1865 272866 (PA) Oxford OX1 3TG, UK Fax: +44 1865 272595