jayoung at fhcrc.org
2008-Nov-08 00:00 UTC
[Rd] geeglm crashes if there are no datapoints in predictor's first level (PR#13266)
Hi, I managed to make R core dump (linux and Mac OSX versions), but I think I've figured out why. First, here's the message I get on core dump (on linux - no message on Mac): R: ../inst/include/tnt/fmat.h:529: TNT::Vector<T> TNT::matmult(const TNT::Fortran_Matrix<T>&, const TNT::Vector<T>&) [with T = double]: Assertion `A.num_cols() == x.dim()' failed. Abort (core dumped) Second, here's the command: mygeeglm<- geeglm(outcome ~ input , data=mydata, id=mydata$group) Third, my explanation (the dataset is pasted at the very bottom) - initially, mydata$input was an ordered factor, with levels "Med", "Low", "High" BUT the data did not contain any datapoints with value "Med" (yes, I know I shouldn't have used that as input!). I'm pretty sure the absence of datapoints in that first category is what's causing the crash, because when I change the levels of the factor to reflect the datapoints remaining (levels "Low", "High") the geeglm command ran just fine. So it'd be great if geeglm (or whatever function it's calling) could check for stupid mistakes in the input data like the one I was making, and report an error, rather than causing R to crash. Thanks, Janet Young ------------------------------------------------------------------- Dr. Janet Young Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center 1100 Fairview Avenue N., C3-168, P.O. Box 19024, Seattle, WA 98109-1024, USA. tel: (206) 667 1471 fax: (206) 667 6524 email: jayoung at fhcrc.org http://www.fhcrc.org/labs/trask/ ------------------------------------------------------------------- > mydata group outcome input 1 bA175B9 0.99370982 High 2 bA322N21 0.58099071 High 3 bA322N21 -0.05601471 High 4 bA322N21 -0.01608595 High 5 bA322N21 -0.65053824 High 6 bA322N21 -0.05417095 High 7 bA382M16 0.01030286 High 8 bA396D18 0.25673448 High 9 bA415J8 -1.04672184 High 10 bA421E17 -1.30500465 High 11 bA454L1 -0.65803623 High 12 bA47A4 3.38755577 High 13 bA552M11 -0.06518991 High 14 bA552M11 0.11066039 High 15 bA552M11 0.14413606 High 16 bA552M11 0.07093663 High 17 bA552M11 0.27674192 High 18 bA552M11 0.26482473 High 19 bA90O23 0.18827961 High 20 dJ1071N3 -0.22666352 High 21 dJ1126H10 -0.34280590 High 22 dJ21O18 -0.94399366 Low 23 dJ329E20 -0.22666352 High 24 dJ533D7 0.58099071 High 25 dJ533D7 -0.05601471 High 26 dJ533D7 -0.01608595 High 27 dJ533D7 -0.65053824 High 28 dJ580L15 -0.40615304 High 29 dJ580L15 0.54838865 High 30 dJ580L15 0.20731824 High 31 dJ655N15 -0.63766633 Low 32 dJ65J11 -1.44140328 Low 33 dJ836N10 -0.06518991 High 34 dJ836N10 0.07093663 High 35 dJ836N10 0.27674192 High
Seemingly Similar Threads
- Datapoints underneath datapoints Problem
- [Bug 13266] New: Writing of files to Apple's new "AP" controller model SSD's takes 4x longer.
- graphical representation of a correlation between 3 variables (~30 datapoints)
- Creating One Single Object Linking Multiple Datapoints
- How to translate the 2D-density matrix (the output of bkde2D function) into matrix of datapoints' amounts?