Full_Name: Peter Ehlers Version: 1.6.0 OS: Windows 2000 Pro Submission from: (NULL) (136.159.61.178) In: p.adjust package:base R Documentation In the paragraph: Hochberg's and Hommel's methods are valid when the hypothesis tests are independent or when they are non-negatively associated (Sarkar, 1998; Sarker and Chang, 1997). Hommel's method is more powerful than Hochberg's, but the difference is usually small and the Hochberg p-values are faster to compute. Change: Sarker To: Sarkar -.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.- r-devel mailing list -- Read http://www.ci.tuwien.ac.at/~hornik/R/R-FAQ.html Send "info", "help", or "[un]subscribe" (in the "body", not the subject !) To: r-devel-request@stat.math.ethz.ch _._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._
>>>>> "ehlers" == ehlers <ehlers@math.ucalgary.ca> >>>>> on Wed, 30 Oct 2002 19:36:01 +0100 (MET) writes:ehlers> Full_Name: Peter Ehlers ehlers> Version: 1.6.0 ehlers> In: ehlers> p.adjust package:base R Documentation .... ehlers> Change: Sarker ehlers> To: Sarkar Done. Thank you. -.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.- r-devel mailing list -- Read http://www.ci.tuwien.ac.at/~hornik/R/R-FAQ.html Send "info", "help", or "[un]subscribe" (in the "body", not the subject !) To: r-devel-request@stat.math.ethz.ch _._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._
Reasonably Related Threads
- Partek has Dunn-Sidak Multiple Test Correction. Is this the same/similar to any of R's p.adjust.methods?
- p.adjust(<NA>s), was "Re: [BioC] limma and p-values"
- a question about sort and BH
- p.adjust(<NA>s), was "Re: [BioC] limma and p-values"
- p.adjust; n > length(p) (PR#13519)