search for: pet

I''m new to rails and ruby, and after trying to get this to work correctly for hours, I thought I''d give this forum an try. I''ve setup a trivial project just to mess around with Rails database naming conventions and associations. I''ve got a table called Pets, and a table called Types. Pets contains a list of pets, Parky the cat, Daisy the dog, etc, And Types contains a list of different pet types, dog - cat - fish - bird - etc. Pets table CREATE TABLE `pets` ( `id` int(11) NOT NULL auto_increment, `name` varchar(20) default NULL, `pet_id` int...

Hm. I may misunderstand, but I'm not sure that's an improvement over the problem you're trying to solve. How about something like this? (Please forgive any accent; I don't speak snake fluently.) class Pet(object): @staticmethod def new(): # Create a 'free' pet. It can later become owned, but not to more than one owner. return Pet(_core.LLVMCreatePet(), None) def __init__(self, ptr, owner): self.ptr = ptr self.owner = owner def __del__(self): # Do not...

I am working on writing a search method where a user can type a string of words and I return all the objects that have fields that match all of the words in one or a combination of fields. Person first_name last_name Pet name Person has_many :pets I want to write some SQL so that if I search for "Tony AAAA" I will get all the people who have Tony and AAA either in their first_name or last_name fields or in any of their pet''s name fields. For example, it would be ok to return a person if t...

Hey all, I''m using a simple search function. It''s working great except for foreign keys. I have one table pets (id,name,owner_id) and another table people(id,name) owner_id being a foreign key of pet pointing to people name. here it is on the pet controller: @paginator, @pets= paginate(:pets, :conditions =>["name OR owner_id like ?","%"+params[:filter]+"%"], :include =>...

Is there a way to set the base class to abstract? or otherwise enforce that no one can create a "Pet"? Pet < ActiveRecord Dog < Pet Pig < Pet I''ve tried: class Pet < ActiveRecord::Base validates_presence_of :type end but I get an error about ../vendor/rails/activerecord/lib/active_record/validations.rb:74: warning: Object#type is deprecated; use Object#class --~--...

gledaj online filmove potpuno besplatno... http://pet.prevodim.com/interspire/link.php?M=181705&N=11&L=8&F=T ** ?ta je potrebno za gledanje filmova preko interneta (http://pet.prevodim.com/interspire/link.php?M=181705&N=11&L=8&F=T) ------------------------------------------------------------ Da biste gledali filmi?e pr...

Hi all, Suppose I had the below example where a survey was carried out recording the number of each type of pet in each house count<-c(2,1,2,1,2,3,4) house<-c("house1","house1","house2","house3","house4","house4","house4") pet<-c("dogs","cats","dogs","dogs","budgie","cat&quot...

...refers to the left? hand side variables) in categories which are determined by a single left hand side variable. my problem is that the argument fun seems not to be compatible with method=reverse!? every continuous variable is summarized in three quantiles. here is an example: hist is a factor, PET and CT are "numeric" summary(PET~hist,data=her,fun=sum) PET N=47 +-------+------------------+--+---+ | | |N |PET| +-------+------------------+--+---+ |hist |Morbus Hodgkin |18| 81| | |Niedrigmaligne NHL|11| 39| | |Hochmaligne NHL |18| 49| +-...

On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 1:22 PM, Gordon Henriksen <gordonhenriksen at mac.com> wrote: > On 2008-05-13, at 02:12, Mahadevan R wrote: > > >>> That's not how the object works... > > > > Gordon, I think I can make it work if we have the following additional > > function in LLVM-C: > > > > LLVMModuleRef LLVMGetModule(LLVMModuleProviderRef

On 2008-05-13, at 02:12, Mahadevan R wrote: >>> That's not how the object works... > > Gordon, I think I can make it work if we have the following additional > function in LLVM-C: > > LLVMModuleRef LLVMGetModule(LLVMModuleProviderRef MP) { > return wrap(unwrap(MP)->getModule()); > } Can I ask, how general is your solution? I only intended to use this

I am using the drop shadow technique described at http://www.1976design.com/blog/archive/2003/11/14/shadows/ to give several of my divs drop shadows. That part works fine. What doesn''t work so well is when I try to BlindDown a div in Firefox and it ends up ignoring the content below it and just overlapping it. In IE this problem does not occur. In Firefox the overlapping does

...r.2 <- c("lazy", "destructive", "antisocial", "goofy") color <- c("white", "brown", "black", "black") char.3 <- c("fat", "tiny", "evil", "big") age <- c(16, 2, 5, 10) pet.data <- data.frame(owner, animal, char.1, food, char.2, color, char.3, age) animal <- c("cat", "dog") v1 <- c("fluffy", "big") v2 <- c("fat", "stupid") pet.key <- data.frame(animal, v1, v2...

hi railers, I have a model/view/controller with many associations (20+). I would like to display the relative associations using AJAX, allowing the user to display the association his/her is interesting at a particular time. Is here any kind ajax tabs helper or some kind of tab widgets that I can easily incorporate into my rails application. regards, leon -------------- next part --------------

...@auto_flush=false, @open=true, @mon_owner=nil, @id_field=:id, @reader=nil, @mon_waiting_queue=[], @writer=nil, @default_input_field=:id, @dir=#<Ferret::Store::RAMDirectory:0xb77dc1b8>> *** Now let''s add 3 strings to the index *** irb(main):005:0> ["While you were out pet care", "Eastside dog walker", "Top daw g dog walker"].each {|text| i << text } => ["While you were out pet care", "Eastside dog walker", "Top dawg dog walker"] *** Now let''s do some searches *** irb(main):006:0> puts i....

...ed of just by skipping the ''-w'' flag on the shebang line. The two tables I have are: CREATE TABLE `people` ( `id` int(11) NOT NULL auto_increment, `name` varchar(20) NOT NULL default ''"'', PRIMARY KEY (`id`) ) TYPE=MyISAM; CREATE TABLE `pets` ( `id` int(11) NOT NULL auto_increment, `name` varchar(20) default NULL, `kind` varchar(30) default NULL, `person_id` int(11) default NULL, PRIMARY KEY (`id`) ) TYPE=MyISAM; The error is caused by the following: class Person < ActiveRecord::Base has_many :pets...

Hello, R friends, I'm trying to crack this nut: Example Data. pet    gender dog    male dog    female dog    male cat    female cat    female cat    male Plot Task. Horizontal 100% bars where y axis shows gender factor (male vs. female) and x axis shows percentage of kind of pets (dog vs. cat) so that % dogs + % cats are stacked in 1 bar and sum up to 100% (f...

...d7f4 DSA invocationId: 055634e1-d57e-45de-bed8-4f57e001e992 ==== INBOUND NEIGHBORS ==== DC=ForestDnsZones,DC=mycompany,DC=corp Default-First-Site-Name\DC02 via RPC DSA object GUID: 65ff32e1-30a4-4697-a83f-d32815f31035 Last attempt @ Mon Apr 10 10:02:16 2017 PET failed, result 2 (WERR_BADFILE) 21101 consecutive failure(s). Last success @ Sat Jan 28 07:56:07 2017 PET DC=DomainDnsZones,DC=mycompany,DC=corp Default-First-Site-Name\DC02 via RPC DSA object GUID: 65ff32e1-30a4-4697-a83f-d32815f31035...

...there is such a thing as an updateClass, in order to change a "contains" option, please? that is, if I had setClass("dog", representation(name="character",paws="numeric",tail="character")) Fair enough. Later I want to have a class called "pets". setClass("pets",representation(name="character",total="numeric")) I want dog to be a subclass of pets. Do I put in the setClass command as it stands with the additional contains="pets", or is there an update form to use, please? Hope this makes se...

Um. Unfortunately in this case, Python will not collect an instance of Pet which owned by an Owner, because both objects in the reference cycle have finalizers (__del__). Python will just add both objects to a garbage list (and will not call any of the finalizers). It does this because it cannot guess which finalizer to call first. But I get your point though, and will...

On May 13, 2008, at 07:31, Mahadevan R wrote: > Um. Unfortunately in this case, Python will not collect an instance > of Pet which owned by an Owner, because both objects in the > reference cycle have finalizers (__del__). Python will just add both > objects to a garbage list (and will not call any of the finalizers). Actually, there's no reference cycle, which is what I presume is the problem you're...