Jo Rhett
2011-Nov-01 01:50 UTC
[Puppet Users] severe bug in 2.6.12: Caught TERM; calling stop
Mon Oct 31 23:03:31 +0000 2011 Puppet (notice): Caught TERM; calling stop Ever since the 2.6.12 upgrade I''ve been seeing these reports reach us. As in, about a hundred of a half thou machines. Most of the time we find that $vardir/state/puppetdlock is in place and blocking further puppet runs, which requires a manual resolution. I wrote a quick cron script to look for puppetdlock files older than one hour, remove them and mail me a report and I''ve received several dozen in the last few hours. Something is clearly broken in 2.6.12, we are backgrading our systems to 2.6.11. No-- I have no other information than that it crosses all of our machine types, and we have had no significant changes in our modules in this time period. Many of the machines which have failed have had zero module or manifest changes which would apply to them. I cannot get this to replicate on the command line. -- Jo Rhett Net Consonance : consonant endings by net philanthropy, open source and other randomness -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Users" group. To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to puppet-users+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.
Peter Meier
2011-Nov-01 08:10 UTC
Re: [Puppet Users] severe bug in 2.6.12: Caught TERM; calling stop
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 11/01/2011 02:50 AM, Jo Rhett wrote:> Mon Oct 31 23:03:31 +0000 2011 Puppet (notice): Caught TERM; > calling stop > > Ever since the 2.6.12 upgrade I''ve been seeing these reports reach > us. As in, about a hundred of a half thou machines. Most of the > time we find that $vardir/state/puppetdlock is in place and > blocking further puppet runs, which requires a manual resolution. > > [...] > > No-- I have no other information than that it crosses all of our > machine types, and we have had no significant changes in our > modules in this time period. Many of the machines which have > failed have had zero module or manifest changes which would apply > to them. I cannot get this to replicate on the command line. >Can you open a bugreport? Having already that information available is great. Thanks! ~pete -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk6vqVsACgkQbwltcAfKi383WQCgl9Nx/s2XQ6si9n+XUgdVdEfE 3agAn3T2n+4HTJzpT+gqWw6a0m5H2GB5 =+5qz -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Users" group. To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to puppet-users+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.